This essay argues that educators have a professional duty to build curricula from established academic knowledge rather than simply catering to students' popular culture preferences. While acknowledging that elements of pop culture can enrich learning when purposefully integrated, the paper maintains that classical texts, peer-reviewed scholarship, and disciplinary fundamentals must anchor any sound curriculum. Drawing on examples from literature, psychology, economics, engineering, and history, the essay contends that a teacher-directed foundation in core concepts is what enables students to think critically, engage in meaningful academic discourse, and eventually apply their knowledge creatively and independently. Pandering to trends at the expense of foundational learning ultimately deprives students of a genuine education.
The paper demonstrates effective use of analogy to make abstract arguments tangible. The comparison of ignoring established knowledge to "learning a language without conjugating a verb" is a particularly strong example: it translates a complex pedagogical claim into an immediately intuitive illustration, a technique that helps general readers grasp disciplinary stakes without requiring specialized background knowledge.
The essay follows a classical argumentative structure. It opens with a vivid problem scenario (educators chasing trends), states its thesis, then devotes successive body paragraphs to the positive case for foundational curricula, the dangers of abandoning them, and the productive middle ground where pop culture can supplement — not replace — core knowledge. The final paragraphs zoom out to student outcomes and societal stakes before a concise conclusion restates the duty of educators. This funnel-and-return structure gives the argument both momentum and closure.
In an attempt to appear hip, educators in high school and college are not only dressing down — they are teaching unconventional subjects informed by popular culture. For example, a music class might include a dissection of a Madonna tune, or a media class might break apart the gender implications of South Park (Parker and Stone, 1997). Students often love their teachers and professors when they introduce elements of pop culture into the curriculum, because doing so allows them to sidestep weightier academic issues. Due to rampant cynicism and boredom among today's youth, educators are trying their best to get students interested in their subjects. However, educators are not there to please, to become buddies with their class, or to look hip.
Elements of popular culture should only be inserted into school curricula when they directly enhance learning or when students can better understand core philosophies within a familiar context. For example, to teach about the physiological effects of watching violent imagery on television, an educator could have the class watch a horror film while connected to equipment that measures their physiological responses — in addition to assigning peer-reviewed academic articles on the subject. Still, students need to return to the basics: the fundamentals of solid education that allow them to engage in meaningful academic discourse throughout the rest of their lives. Such meaningful discourse arises from an educator who fearlessly introduces classical curricula into the classroom without worrying whether or not students approve. Educators should be teaching what they know to the best of their ability, thereby exposing students to ideas they might not have reached on their own.
Educators should carefully build their curricula from the foundation of academic knowledge that already exists and is currently accepted within the academic community. If literature students could read only what they wanted on demand, they would choose Harry Potter over Homer's Odyssey. Harry Potter has its place in a course on the evolution of children's literature, but the classics must always be included in the curriculum because students will rarely pick them up on their own. Students of literature should, at least in their first few years at a university, be steeped in the classics — from epic Greek poetry to Shakespeare to Faulkner. There is a reason why certain works of art and literature have been studied for years, even centuries.
Similarly, there is good reason for stressing the importance of peer-reviewed academic journal articles over Internet blogs. Peer-reviewed articles can be off-putting to students at first, but without them, academia would flounder in unproven assertions and opinions rather than well-researched facts. Moreover, it is the express duty of the educator to expose students to the core concepts of their discipline. In psychology, for instance, core concepts include the fundamentals of psychoanalysis and cognitive science. A course in comparative economics would likewise not simply stress concepts already familiar to students; it should encompass the entire range of the subject. It is also the duty of educators to draw students' attention to concepts largely absent from popular culture, such as issues related to class, gender, and racial discrimination.
Educators need to draw their curricula from the established annals of academic wisdom. Without this grounding, students will not end up with a solid or useful education. By definition, an educator is paid to teach, not to be taught. Students who try to direct the school curriculum often do so because they want the easy way out. Like spoiled children, they resist the hard work that earns the richest rewards. As a result, instant gratification and taking the path of least resistance have become cultural habits. Allowing students to ignore established knowledge would be like learning to speak a language without ever conjugating a verb: it is easier, but it will not really work.
Education is time-consuming and expensive, so a student is getting ripped off if he or she graduates from college without receiving a structured education. If, after four or more years of college, all a student can show is an ability to critique a prime time television cartoon, the purpose of education has been lost. The duty of the educator is to craft the curriculum. Young people absorb enough popular culture from films and television on their own; even when the student body demands a more hip curriculum, professional educators should be sure to incorporate the classics. An ideal education is one firmly rooted in traditional texts and theories, yet one that also stimulates students to creatively apply what they have learned to the modern world.
You’re 60% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.