This essay compares the contrasting religious worldviews presented in Jonathan Edwards's sermon "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" and Benjamin Franklin's "Autobiography, Part 1." While both men professed strong faith, their conceptions of God differ fundamentally: Edwards portrays a wrathful, punishing deity rooted in strict Puritanical tradition, whereas Franklin envisions a benevolent, providential God who guides and cares for believers. The paper traces how these divergent views reflect broader shifts in early American religious thought, arguing that Franklin's more forgiving and humanistic conception gradually supplanted Edwards's fearful orthodoxy as society and spiritual sensibilities evolved over time.
The paper demonstrates comparative textual analysis: selecting two primary sources, identifying a shared theme (belief in God), and systematically examining how each author's language and imagery reveals a fundamentally different theological stance. This technique requires the writer to move beyond summary and show how specific word choices — Edwards's "destruction," "sin," and "falling" versus Franklin's "kind providence" — serve as evidence for larger interpretive claims.
The essay opens by framing the central question and introducing both texts. It then devotes a focused paragraph to Franklin's view, followed by a longer paragraph on Edwards that draws explicit contrast. A concluding section broadens the argument to the historical evolution of American religious belief, ending with a forward-looking claim about how belief systems must adapt over time. The structure moves logically from text-level detail to cultural-historical significance.
This essay examines two foundational texts of early American literature: Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards and The Autobiography, Part 1 by Benjamin Franklin. Specifically, it discusses the major changes in religious belief between the wrathful God of Jonathan Edwards and the benevolent Deism of Benjamin Franklin. It is quite clear that these two men hold very different ideas about God, his ideals, and their own religious goals. Both men possess a strong and unfailing faith in God, but they express it differently, and they envision God very differently.
Benjamin Franklin sees God as a benevolent and caring overseer of human problems and concerns. He writes, "I desire with all humility to acknowledge that I owe the mentioned happiness of my past life to His kind providence…" (Franklin). Franklin sees God as someone who watches over him and takes care of all his children. God is kindly, and leads people down the right path in their lives. Franklin feels that God will bless him because of his devout belief, and that God will watch over all who believe in him and live their lives accordingly. God guides him throughout his life and gives him the wisdom to act well and to raise his family with the same beliefs. Therefore, God will watch over all of Franklin's family and friends, because he is benevolent, wise, and caring.
More importantly, it is clear that Franklin does not fear God or God's wrath, because he believes he lives a good and spiritual life. He does not regard God as vengeful or angry. This distinction, perhaps more than anything else, separates Franklin from Edwards, who sees God as angry and vengeful — frightening to those who do his bidding as well as to those who do not. Franklin is secure in his faith, whereas Edwards appears far more fearful of God's wrath.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.