This paper examines the core elements of entrepreneurial action, focusing on how prospective entrepreneurs navigate uncertain environments, assess risk, and capitalize on competitors' weaknesses. Drawing on examples from Microsoft, Google, and Walmart, the paper illustrates how successful entrepreneurs balance boldness with caution. It also explores the psychological dimensions of entrepreneurship — including risk propensity, attitude toward uncertainty, and the subjective perception of opportunity — alongside macro-level economic arguments about how uncertainty shapes entrepreneurial behavior. Together, these perspectives reveal entrepreneurship as both a personal disposition and a critical driver of economic dynamism.
The paper demonstrates synthesis across multiple sources — blending management theory (McMullan & Shepherd), marketing strategy (Read et al.), and business case analysis (Cohan & Rangan) into a coherent argument. Rather than summarizing each source in isolation, the author weaves them together to build a nuanced claim: that entrepreneurial success depends on both external opportunity recognition and internal psychological orientation toward risk.
The paper opens by outlining the attractions and obstacles of entrepreneurship, then moves through models for operating under uncertainty. It builds through case studies — Microsoft exploiting IBM's blind spots, Google maintaining an innovative culture, Walmart learning from competitors — before stepping back to address the theoretical debate between objective and subjective conceptions of uncertainty. The conclusion situates entrepreneurship within a broader economic and social context.
When contemplating going out on their own, prospective entrepreneurs know they face a number of potential risks as well as rewards. The attractions of entrepreneurship for the businessperson include the independence it offers, greater freedom and control over the final product, and the unlimited earning potential that can come from owning one's own business. An entrepreneur is not limited to earning a fixed salary. But unlike someone working for a salary, the entrepreneur must also bear the risks of the venture.
Some of the most common obstacles faced by budding entrepreneurs include the difficulties of marketing, researching the customer base, and assessing potential financial rewards for a new business; dealing with government regulations; writing a business plan; obtaining capital and a good location; and creating partnerships with others (Schulaka 2009: 8). As one framework puts it, "individuals are forced to expose themselves to the possibility of either committing an error of commission (taking action only to find their belief was unfounded) or committing an error of omission (not taking action only to regret it when time proves that their passed-over hunch was correct)" (McMullan & Shepherd 2006: 139). Entrepreneurship is a risk — but so is not acting and missing out on an opportunity.
Entrepreneurship offers no guarantees. Many businesses fail, but a handful of ventures meet with great success. "Uncertainty is an attribute not only of entrepreneurial settings but also of virtually every environment in which marketing occurs today" (Read et al. 2009: 1). There is no single model for operating under conditions of uncertainty; rather, there is a series of models the entrepreneur can consider when embarking upon a venture. Some may use past outcomes as a guideline, but the entrepreneur must ask: "Is your environment stable enough that you can reliably base future actions on data from the past?" (Read et al. 2009: 3). Others may focus solely on the goals of the enterprise to guide decision-making, rather than on the external environment. However, in most instances of uncertainty, some risk-benefit analysis of competitors and the marketplace is required so that the most appropriate actions will be taken, since businesses do not operate in a vacuum.
On a psychological level, most people are uncomfortable with uncertainty, and many observe the principle that "failure is likely in uncertainty. Make small bets, so when you fail, it is not catastrophic, and you can incorporate the learning into the next iteration of the opportunity instead of having to terminate the project" (Read et al. 2009: 3). Yet an "expect the worst" mindset may lead to pessimism. Ultimately, it is better to cultivate a proactive and positive attitude and look for possible new relationships.
Successful entrepreneurs act with confidence, even in the face of uncertainty. An excellent example is Bill Gates. As a budding entrepreneur, Gates took advantage of his major competitor IBM's arrogance when negotiating with the technology giant. Gates "asked for one thing: unfettered rights to license the OS to potential clones of the IBM PC. IBM, assuming that no PC-clone market would emerge quickly, was happy to grant Gates' wish" — but the rapid pace of technology ensured that clones in the form of Dell and HP supplanted IBM's formerly unquestioned dominance (Cohan & Rangan 2006: 58). "The entrepreneurial mind seeks to understand an incumbent's confirmatory biases because they represent strategic blind spots that may present a rich source of profitable new business. Microsoft's performance shows just how rich those new markets can be" (Cohan & Rangan 2006: 58).
The example of Microsoft also highlights one of the paradoxes of entrepreneurship. On one hand, small start-ups can be uniquely vulnerable to the ups and downs of the market, since they have a fragile customer base and so much to lose. On the other hand, large enterprises like IBM can become too comfortable with themselves and lose the ability to perceive the need for change. "Successful start-up CEOs, such as the ones running Google, for example, believe that, while the future is so difficult to predict, experimentation will allow them to make sense of it" (Cohan & Rangan 2006: 58). A successful entrepreneur has the confidence to perceive such an opportunity and the emotional wherewithal to act upon it.
Provided that entrepreneurs make use of uncertainty in an intelligent fashion, they have the potential to exploit volatile conditions and gain inroads against a more established, seemingly intractable competitor like IBM. The then-tiny Microsoft knew that it had no choice but to act boldly against IBM — and to use IBM's arrogance against it.
Most argue that entrepreneurship, whatever its form, is a universally good value, and that "the health of the economy depends on the pursuit of opportunities by prospective entrepreneurs" (McMullan & Shepherd 2006: 133). It produces new products, new ideas, and infuses new competition into the marketplace. While the qualities that drive great entrepreneurship — as manifested in the companies of Microsoft and Google — cannot necessarily be produced or predicted by a formula, it is essential for entrepreneurship to flourish so that the economy remains responsive to consumer needs.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.