This paper examines the five fundamental components of executive compensation plans: base salary, short-term bonuses, long-term incentives, executive benefits, and perquisites. It explains how compensation committees determine pay levels, how stock options and long-term incentives have grown in share of total compensation, and how executive benefits and perks are structured by rank. The paper also addresses the evolving tax landscape—including the Tax Revenue Act, Tax Reform Act, and Taxpayer Relief Act—and how these legislative changes affect marginal compensation rates, payroll obligations, and government efforts to reduce poverty and incentivize socially beneficial corporate and individual behavior.
The paper demonstrates taxonomic exposition: organizing a multifaceted subject into clearly labeled, sequentially presented categories. Each category is introduced, defined, and illustrated before moving to the next. This technique is particularly effective in business and HR writing, where readers often consult documents for reference rather than linear reading.
The paper opens with a brief framing statement, then presents five labeled components in a list-style format with explanatory prose for each. It then widens its scope to address the tax and legislative context that shapes how these compensation elements are designed and regulated. It closes by connecting tax policy to broader social goals such as poverty reduction and income support, ending on a policy-level observation rather than a narrow HR conclusion.
There are five basic components of an executive compensation plan: base salary, bonuses or short-term incentives, capital appreciation and long-term incentives, executive benefits, and perquisites. Each component plays a distinct role in attracting, retaining, and motivating top-level talent.
Although formal job evaluation still plays a crucial role in determining executive base salary, other sources tend to be more important. Most significant is the opinion of a compensation committee, usually composed of the organization's board of directors. In most cases, the compensation committee takes over some of the information analysis previously performed by the chief human resource manager (Samsa & Scheidt, 2013). This includes analyzing performance records and salary survey data for executives of comparable firms.
Executive compensation committees typically identify the main competitors and set the executive's compensation at a level between the lowest and highest pay among these comparison organizations.
Annual bonuses are essential in executive compensation and are fundamentally designed to encourage better performance. The popularity of this compensation approach has been rapidly increasing. Currently, bonuses are awarded to almost 90% of executives (Henderson, 2006). These short-term incentives serve as a direct link between individual performance outcomes and financial reward.
Today, long-term incentives contribute approximately forty percent of total executive compensation, up from thirty percent a decade ago. The executive stock option remains the most common form of long-term executive incentive. A stock option refers to the right to purchase a defined amount of stock at a stipulated price over a given period, based on certain eligibility requirements (Samsa & Scheidt, 2013). This structure aligns executive interests with long-term organizational performance and shareholder value.
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.