Ethical Decision-Making at Faith Community Hospital
This case study examines the decision-making process at Faith Community Hospital from a collective management perspective. The paper identifies three core institutional problems: the absence of uniform organizational processes, inadequate standardized ethical procedures, and a poorly functioning communication system. Using a structured decision-making framework, it analyzes the causes of these failures, evaluates their financial and legal consequences, and proposes concrete alternatives — including a formal code of ethics and standardized policies for situations such as DNR orders and uninsured patients. Drawing on scholarship in ethical decision-making and organizational behavior, the paper concludes with implementation and measurement strategies to restore service quality and financial stability.
- Introduction and Problem Overview: Three core institutional failures identified at Faith Community Hospital
- Organizational Goals and Stakeholder Criteria: Goals, stakeholder groups, and success criteria defined
- Financial and Ethical Consequences of Inaction: Financial decline and legal risks from unresolved problems
- Root Causes and Alternative Solutions: Management failures and ethical framework alternatives explored
- Evaluating the Impacts of Proposed Alternatives: Costs, trade-offs, and benefits of proposed policy changes
- Decision Implementation and Measurement: Timeline, training, and annual evaluation plan outlined
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Follows a clearly numbered, structured decision-making framework that moves logically from problem identification through implementation, making the argument easy to trace.
- Integrates relevant academic sources (Mattison, Reamer, Humphreys et al.) to ground practical recommendations in published scholarship on ethical decision-making.
- Balances institutional concerns (financial sustainability, legal liability) with humanistic considerations (patient trust, individual belief systems), demonstrating awareness of competing values in healthcare management.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: it takes a real organizational scenario and systematically works through a multi-step decision framework, connecting each stage to both empirical evidence (financial data) and theoretical literature. This mirrors professional consulting logic and shows how academic models translate into actionable recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into two major phases — "Framing the Problem" and "Making the Decision" — each containing numbered subsections. An evaluative closing section covers implementation and measurement. This structure mirrors a formal management decision memo, progressing from diagnosis to prescription to evaluation. The references section is formatted in APA style.
Introduction and Problem Overview
This case study examines the decision-making process from a collective viewpoint. It attempts to resolve issues within a community hospital that have arisen due to failed organizational management, inadequate ethical frameworks, and a poorly established communication system.
The primary problems that exist within Faith Community Hospital center on the following, as outlined by the CEO: (1) a lack of organizational processes that ensure uniformity, (2) a lack of standardized procedures with regard to ethical considerations in a medical environment, and (3) a lack of appropriate communication systems to ensure that everyone is aligned with the same objectives.
At this point in time, Faith Community Hospital has developed a mission statement that clearly identifies the organization's mission, which is, among other things, to provide a quality continuum of service to community members. However, variant interpretations of that mission have led to a chaotic management style and an organizational foundation that does not allow these objectives to be carried out. In addition, rising insurance costs have affected the ability of staff members to provide quality services given a fixed or declining patient population.
Organizational Goals and Stakeholder Criteria
The goals and objectives of the management team include providing "a constant continuum of services to the community in collaboration with partners sharing the same vision and values." Specifically, the common goals among board members, staff, patients, and families should be to ensure the best quality of service with appropriate consideration for personal ethical, moral, and belief criteria. The criteria for determining whether these goals are met include measuring the efficiency of service, the quality of service delivered, and the ability of the organization to break even without compromising those factors.
The forces influencing the organization's ability to meet these goals include the variant thinking styles and collective perceptions that exist among the diverse populations affected by care. As the CEO points out, Faith Community Hospital serves a wide variety of stakeholders, including the board of directors, staff, patients, and their families. The CEO reports that Faith "draws value lines at diverse junctures when it comes to applying rules, differences between ethics, laws and beliefs."
Financial and Ethical Consequences of Inaction
The problem is worth studying because it impacts not only the hospital but also the patients it serves, their families, and the community at large. The costs associated with solving the problem are far less than the costs of allowing it to persist.
As the financial analysis indicates, a drop in population of as much as 7% is currently occurring. Within the organization, 28% of costs are fixed and not associated with population size; in order for the hospital to break even, costs must be reduced by as much as 15%. Furthermore, if the internal problems related to organizational processes, ethical considerations, and communication are not resolved, staff and patients will continue to disagree about treatment outcomes. The hospital could potentially face grave financial burdens resulting from lawsuits stemming from public perceptions of inadequate care.
If nothing were done, the hospital might face bankruptcy or go out of business entirely, unable to meet the financial demands of running a community hospital or to satisfy the legal requirements of assuring the best possible outcome for all patients.
References
Dolecheck, M. M., & Dolecheck, C. C. (1989). Ethics: Take it from the top. Business (January–March), 12–18.
Humphreys, N., Moak, D. L., Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (1993). The ethical decision making process of small business owner/managers and their customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(3), 9.
Mattison, M. (2000). Ethical decision making: The person in the process. Social Work, 45(3), 201.
Reamer, F. (1995). Social work values and ethics. Columbia University Press.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.