Feminist Themes in "The Birthmark" and "A Rose for Emily"
This paper offers a comparative feminist analysis of Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Birthmark" and William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily," examining how male obsession and control shape the fates of their female protagonists. Drawing on Judith Fetterley's feminist criticism, the paper explores how Aylmer's perfectionist obsession destroys Georgiana and how Emily Grierson's repressive upbringing under her father's authority leads to her tragic isolation and act of revenge. The analysis highlights the common thread of female victimization at the hands of male authority figures while noting a key distinction: where Georgiana dies in silent compliance, Emily refuses to be entirely subdued.
- Introduction: A Feminist Framework: Fetterley's feminist lens applied to both texts
- Aylmer's Obsession and Georgiana's Victimization: Aylmer's perfectionism destroys Georgiana through control
- Emily Grierson and the Tyranny of Her Father: Emily's repression stems from her father's authority
- Comparing the Two Women: Compliance Versus Resistance: Georgiana complies silently; Emily resists violently
- Conclusion: The Common Thread of Male Control: Male authority victimizes both women across both stories
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its feminist reading in a named critical framework — Judith Fetterley's The Resisting Reader — giving the comparative analysis scholarly authority.
- It draws a sharp and meaningful contrast between Georgiana's fatal compliance and Emily's act of violent resistance, preventing the argument from becoming repetitive.
- Quotations from both primary texts and secondary criticism are woven into the argument rather than dropped in without context, demonstrating integrative use of evidence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models comparative literary analysis anchored in a single critical lens. Rather than treating each story in isolation, the author identifies a shared thematic structure — male authority figures destroying female autonomy — and then uses that structure to highlight meaningful differences between the two protagonists. This approach shows how a theoretical framework can both unify and differentiate texts simultaneously.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing its feminist critical lens through Fetterley, then examines Aylmer's symbolic and literal destruction of Georgiana in detail. It moves to Emily's parallel but distinct situation under her father's control, followed by a direct comparative section that contrasts passive victimhood with active resistance. The conclusion synthesizes the thematic connection and restates the central argument. The structure is linear and thesis-driven, appropriate for a comparative literary essay at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: A Feminist Framework
Judith Fetterley's feminist criticism provides a powerful lens through which to read both Nathaniel Hawthorne's "The Birthmark" and William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily." Fetterley observes that a reader approaching "A Rose for Emily" must struggle "to use it on Homer, so strong is the presumption that ladies when jilted commit suicide, not murder" (Fetterley 41). This observation points to one of the central tensions in both stories: the way in which women are expected to be passive victims rather than agents of their own fate. Both texts reward a feminist critical reading that exposes the mechanisms by which male authority figures diminish, control, and ultimately destroy the women in their lives.
References
The Centenary Edition of the Works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. 20 vols. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1962–85. "The Birth-mark." 36–56. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1968.
Frederick J. Hoffman (editor) and Olga W. Vickery (editor). William Faulkner: Two Decades of Criticism. Michigan State College Press. East Lansing, MI. 1951.
William Faulkner. "A Rose for Emily." Collected Stories. New York: Vintage, 1977. p. 128.
Judith Fetterley. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Indiana University Press. Bloomington, IN. 1978.
Feminist Criticism and Social Change. Ed. Judith Newton and Deborah Rosenfelt. New York: Methuen, 1985.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.