Financial Statement Analysis of Propane Industry Companies
This paper conducts a comparative financial statement analysis of four propane distribution companies — Ferrellgas, Amerigas, Suburban, and Inergy — using key performance ratios including current ratio, return on equity, gross margin, and receivables turnover. The analysis ranks each firm across liquidity, investment returns, profitability, and management efficiency. It identifies Suburban as the financially healthiest company, followed by Amerigas and Inergy, with Ferrellgas ranked last due to unsustainable debt levels and cash burn. The paper also evaluates investment attractiveness across the industry, concluding that overall sector trends are unfavorable and that Ferrellgas, in particular, presents significant default risk.
- Ranking Methodology and Overall Results: Ratio-based ranking of four propane companies
- Evaluating Red Flags by Company: Company-by-company red flag and risk analysis
- Investment Outlook for the Industry: Industry attractiveness and investment recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper establishes a clear, transparent ranking methodology upfront, explaining why each metric was chosen and why debt/equity was deliberately excluded — this shows analytical self-awareness.
- It proactively addresses potential objections, such as the unusual liquidity reading for Inergy, rather than ignoring anomalous data points.
- Each company receives individualized analysis with specific evidence (e.g., "balance sheet is 93.9% debt," "paid more in dividends than earned from operations"), grounding conclusions in concrete figures.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative ratio analysis with critical adjustment — a technique where raw scores are recalibrated when contextual red flags reveal a misleading picture. The treatment of Inergy's inflated current ratio is a strong example: the author identifies an influx of cash from capital markets as the cause, adjusts the ranking accordingly, and explains the reasoning. This shows that financial analysis requires interpretation, not just calculation.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized around three analytical questions. Section one establishes the ranking methodology and announces overall results. Section two defends the most controversial finding — Inergy's weak underlying position — and provides a company-by-company breakdown of red flags. Section three shifts to investment perspective, arguing the industry as a whole is unattractive and singling out Ferrellgas as the weakest investment candidate.
Ranking Methodology and Overall Results
In order to determine which companies excel at overall performance, some value must be assigned to the different ratios and performance measures. For example, Inergy has exceptional liquidity but offers a poor return on equity. One way to resolve the issue is to rank the firms across a few key categories and see which firm achieves the best overall ranking. This method emphasizes stability and consistency over exceptional performance in any single measure. For this analysis, current ratio, ROE, gross margin, and receivables turnover are used. These measures cover the key categories of liquidity, investment returns, profitability, and management efficiency. The debt/equity ratio has been excluded specifically because a firm's choice of capital structure is dependent on the industry, and all four firms carry low levels of total debt relative to shareholders' equity.
The firms score as follows: Ferrellgas scores a 12, Amerigas scores an 11, Suburban a 7, and Inergy a 10. Before a final determination is made about which company is the healthiest, the results should be examined for red flags. For instance, there is no difference in rankings between operating margin and gross margin, demonstrating the usefulness of the latter measure. There is a red flag, however, with respect to liquidity. The current ratio at Inergy is very high, but its interest coverage is the lowest of the four firms. This points to the company having a balance sheet loaded with cash while lacking in operating liquidity. Indeed, Inergy had a much lower current ratio in the previous fiscal year, indicating that the company received an influx of cash that is unduly inflating the current ratio for this fiscal year. In general, the company is not as liquid as the current figures suggest.
This finding, however, only serves to strengthen the case that Suburban is in the best financial health of the four companies. Adjusting Inergy's score for liquidity, the company falls into last place. The order of the four companies is as follows: Suburban has the best financial condition, Amerigas the second-best, Inergy the third-best, and Ferrellgas the worst. The reasons for the latter assessment are examined in detail below, based on specific red flags beyond this particular ranking exercise.
Evaluating Red Flags by Company
Perhaps the most controversial part of this analysis is the claim that Inergy has the weakest underlying financial position of the four companies. Inergy has a strong cash position, but this is derived from operating activities. Prior to the debt and stock issuances that contributed substantial cash to Inergy, the company had the weakest balance sheet of the four firms. While it is encouraging that the company was able to raise capital, the effects of this capital raising must be taken into consideration when analyzing overall financial health. The debt issuance also caused Inergy's debt to increase by 55% — a much larger increase than any other company experienced.
Suburban has the best debt-equity ratio of any of these firms. Ferrellgas, by contrast, has a balance sheet that is 93.9% debt. The company has an acceptable current ratio, but holds a very low amount of cash, and its earnings do not cover its interest payments. This means that Ferrellgas is at risk of default. The company paid more in dividends last year than it earned in cash from operations. In short, Ferrellgas has an unsustainable burn rate. While Inergy had a poor underlying financial position, it was able to tap capital markets to alleviate its cash crunch. Ferrellgas has yet to do this and, of all four firms, is the closest to default.
Amerigas is a mediocre performer within this group. While the company holds very little cash and carries a low current ratio, it is earning enough to cover its interest. It is also paying less in dividends than its cash flow from operations, although it is arguably paying too much given its earnings level and apparent need for capital expenditures. There are red flags with this company as well. Given its current cash situation, one would want to see an improving cash conversion cycle, but that is not the case — both inventory turn and receivables turn are worsening. It is also worth noting that Amerigas is less indebted than Ferrellgas.
The company with the strongest financial position is Suburban. That company maintains a healthy balance sheet, good margins, and solid interest coverage. Although it has experienced declining profit and revenue, it has managed to keep its overall financial condition relatively healthy.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.