Essay Undergraduate 1,240 words

Formalism vs. Realism in Film Theory and Practice

~7 min read
Abstract

This paper examines formalism as a film theory and contrasts it with realism, tracing formalism's development across Soviet, French, and German cinema. Drawing on key texts by Andrew, Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Arnheim, and Balazs, the paper analyzes four films — Kino-Eye, Return to Reason, Ballet Mécanique, and Nosferatu — as representative examples of formalist practice. It explores how each film departs from narrative convention and realistic representation in favor of distortion, surreal imagery, and artist-centered expression. The paper also outlines core distinctions between formalist and realist filmmaking, including differences in editing style, location shooting, and audience engagement.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds its theoretical claims in specific film examples, moving from abstract definition to concrete textual analysis across four distinct works.
  • It maintains a clear comparative structure throughout, consistently returning to the formalism–realism dichotomy to organize its argument.
  • References to recognized theorists (Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Arnheim, Balazs) lend academic credibility and situate the argument within established film theory discourse.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative theoretical analysis: it establishes a theoretical framework (formalism versus realism) and then applies it systematically to multiple primary texts. This approach allows the student to show both comprehension of film theory and the ability to use theory as a lens for interpreting specific cinematic works.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with definitions of formalism and realism, then traces formalism's emergence across national cinemas. It proceeds through individual film analyses (Kino-Eye, Return to Reason, Ballet Mécanique, Nosferatu), contrasts formalist and realist filmmaking conventions, and closes with a synthesis of formalist techniques and their theoretical underpinnings. The structure moves from theory to application to synthesis.

Introduction to Formalism in Film

Formalism as a theory is not concerned with reality (Andrew 6). This is unlike realism, which engages with reality as a product of real-life experience (Braudy & Cohen 24–40). Formalism arose in response to the Modern Crisis. It is a concept in which the character of a film is determined by its forms — that is, by the purely visual aspects of filmmaking and the nature of its medium. Formalism holds that a film's potential lies precisely in its ability to move away from reality. At the same time, formalist film theory maintains that what makes film an art form is its capacity to create and portray its own version of reality (Braudy & Cohen 24–40).

Formalist film directors have no desire to show reality as it is. They intend instead to present their personal vision of the world, involving spiritual and psychological truths, which they convey through the distortion and exaggeration of images.

Formalism in Soviet, French, and German Cinema

In the cinemas of Soviet Russia, France, and Germany, formalism arose significantly within distinct film schools. Despite the fact that these countries had different technical emphases, they each approached filmmaking as a deliberate detachment from reality, with the purpose of capturing and presenting what they believed was a truer cinematic representation of experience (Andrew 6).

Analysis of Key Formalist Films

Considering Vertov's Kino-Eye (Soviet), Man Ray's Return to Reason and Léger's Ballet Mécanique (French), and Murnau's Nosferatu (German), it becomes clear that formalism encompasses a wide variety of approaches. Vertov's Kino-Eye demonstrates the possibilities of cinema to manipulate time and space, always bringing something new to the viewer. The film is perpetually forming and reforming its own system, moving both forward and in reverse. Its capacity to expose hidden labor practices further illustrates that it does not aim to portray reality in any realist sense. Instead, formalism pervades the entire work. Like many other formalist films, Kino-Eye lacks conventional narrative.

The title Return to Reason itself suggests a conservative impulse, yet the images in this film are not produced by a conventional film camera. There is considerable exaggeration in the imagery, which confirms that the film is not realistic. The film is notably short and lacks any narrative, indicating a disregard for traditional representational ideas associated with realism. Rather than reproducing reality, the film experiments by assembling colliding images to evoke emotional reactions. Images are repeated at intervals, and consecutive shots draw attention to the material structure of the film itself.

Much like Return to Reason, Ballet Mécanique presents a disjointed series of interconnected and strange images. This film also lacks narrative, thereby undermining conventional representational ideas of reality (Braudy & Cohen 282–291). Its soundtrack is as unorthodox as its imagery, suggesting that the auditory dimension of the film must be considered alongside its visual presentation when evaluating how it engages with — or departs from — reality.

Nosferatu is a German Expressionist horror film, though expressionism itself evolved considerably in the years that followed. The film's director became a commanding, almost monstrous figure in control of his own productions. The film regards women as vampires and destroyers, and portrays Van Helsing as a foolish scientist preoccupied with bacteria. Within the film's logic, women come to understand that the only way to save civilization is by sacrificing their own sexuality.

Formalism in this film is evident in its powerful treatment of a tragic dilemma: the idea that civilization and social reality depend on repression and on humanity's ability to restrain its own dark forces (Braudy & Cohen 282–291). Formalism is, in many instances, deeply concerned with what is real on a deeper level. Considering this film, its horror does not portray experiences possible in everyday life, yet through this very quality it demonstrates that formalism does not simply escape realism — it redefines and justifies its own relationship to reality.

3 Locked Sections · 490 words remaining
Sign up to read these 3 sections

Realism in Film: Contrasting Principles · 175 words

"How realist films pursue naturalism and audience meaning"

Formalism vs. Realism: Key Distinctions · 130 words

"Editing, location, and audience-centered differences compared"

Formalist Techniques and Theoretical Foundations · 185 words

"Theorists Eisenstein, Pudovkin, Arnheim, and Balazs examined"

You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Film Formalism Cinematic Realism Montage Editing German Expressionism Soviet Cinema Surreal Imagery Narrative Absence Artist-Centered Film Visual Distortion Cinematic Form
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Formalism vs. Realism in Film Theory and Practice. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/formalism-realism-film-theory-86891

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.