This paper examines gender roles as portrayed in two plays from different historical periods: Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing and Susan Glaspell's Trifles. Using specific characters and plot moments, the paper analyzes how both works reflect the social expectations placed on men and women in their respective eras. It explores how characters such as Hero, Beatrice, Benedick, Mrs. Wright, Mrs. Hale, and Mrs. Peters either conform to or subvert conventional gender norms, and considers what those choices reveal about the societies that produced these literary works. The analysis ultimately argues that breaking gender roles carries significant dramatic weight in both plays.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Today, gender roles have become far more flexible than they were even fifty years ago. Women can enter management positions, pursue focused careers, and expect salaries comparable to those of men. Indeed, some women have proved themselves equally or more competent than men in leadership positions. At the same time, women are free to choose the lives they want — whether a career, homemaking, or a balance of both. Society today is far more tolerant of women who make any of these choices.
This is why it is so illuminating to examine plays from earlier times, when assigned gender roles were far more rigid. Authors such as William Shakespeare in Much Ado About Nothing and Susan Glaspell in Trifles offer significant commentary on the social values of their times with regard to gender roles. With the perspective of today, critics can also add their own interpretations of these roles when reading such plays. In both works, women and men occupy commonly accepted gender roles, yet some of the women break the norms imposed by those roles to striking dramatic effect.
In Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, Claudio and Hero are the most obvious examples of traditionally assigned gender roles. Claudio is the typical strapping young nobleman, well-respected and prince-like — the sort of figure meant to sweep the princess-like Hero off her feet. Hero, for her part, is sweet, sensitive, and kind. She plays the typical role of a young woman of her time, longing for marriage and delighted when it arrives in the form of Claudio. The two fall in love almost immediately upon meeting, and neither breaks from their traditional gender roles, even in the face of conflict.
When Claudio is deceived into believing that Hero has been unfaithful, he immediately accepts this as truth — a reaction consistent with the male gender role of the era. When he goes further by publicly humiliating Hero on their wedding day, she responds in a correspondingly typical female manner, suffering an emotional breakdown. She does nothing to defend herself, and neither she nor her family takes any active steps to uncover the truth. Instead, she submits to her father's decision to pretend that she has died from grief and shock. The credibility of this deception — accepted by nearly everyone, including Claudio himself — reinforces just how thoroughly Hero inhabits her assigned gender role.
What is somewhat surprising is Benedick's reaction to Claudio's treatment of Hero. Benedick challenges Claudio to a duel — an act that signifies a meaningful break from his expected loyalty to male solidarity, as he sides instead with Beatrice, Hero's cousin. Beatrice and Benedick, who ultimately fall in love with each other, are far less typical of the traditional gender roles of their day.
Beatrice is a strong female figure: highly intellectual and deeply resistant to being constrained by marriage, particularly to a controlling man. She is content to remain unmarried unless she finds a partner who is truly her equal. Despite their many verbal skirmishes, Benedick becomes precisely that for her — a completely equal partner.
What is particularly interesting is that Beatrice steps outside even her own atypical strong-female character on two occasions. First, she opens herself to the vulnerability created by romantic love. Second, and more dramatically, she reacts with profound anguish to Hero's humiliation. In Act IV, scene i, she wishes aloud that she were a man so that she could avenge Hero's undeserved dishonor (lines 312–318). In doing so, she acknowledges that, for all her intellectual strength, she is unable as a woman to defend another woman's honor in the way that society permits. That role falls to Benedick, who willingly takes it on out of love. Thus, even the formidable Beatrice admits she can do nothing but "die" with "grieving" — because she is a woman.
Following Hero's tragedy, Benedick and Beatrice finally acknowledge their love for each other. Although this draws them toward more conventional gender roles, Beatrice maintains her characteristic strength by engaging in one final war of words with Benedick before agreeing to marry him — a gesture that signals she enters the institution on her own terms. You can read more about the play's treatment of social dynamics at the Folger Shakespeare Library.
"Characters revert to traditional roles through marriage"
"Mrs. Wright's tragedy exposes oppressive domestic expectations"
In both plays, it is illuminating to examine the factors that lead characters to break away from, or choose to remain within, their assigned gender roles. These choices provide interpretive clues for each story's central conflicts and also offer a window into the societies that produced these works. Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing and Glaspell's Trifles both demonstrate that the most dramatically compelling moments arise precisely when characters push against — or are crushed by — the gender expectations their worlds impose upon them.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.