This paper offers a critical analysis of Erving Goffman's 1962 work Asylums, focusing on his concept of the "Total Institution" and its damaging effects on inmates' sense of self. The paper examines key features Goffman identifies in mental asylums — including batch living, binary management, and ritualized admissions procedures — and draws comparisons to prisons and military structures. It argues that the very procedural design of asylums produces pathological outcomes, particularly for individuals with fragile personal identities, ultimately undermining the rehabilitative purpose these institutions claim to serve.
The paper demonstrates effective use of conceptual analysis: it introduces each of Goffman's key terms, explains their meaning, and then applies them critically to the asylum setting. This technique — define, explain, apply — is a strong model for undergraduate book reviews and analytical essays in sociology and related fields.
The paper opens with a historical framing of the word "asylum" and Goffman's challenge to it, then moves through increasingly specific critiques: first the general concept of Total Institutions, then the specific mechanisms of batch living and binary management, and finally the psychological damage done to inmates' sense of self. This funnel structure — broad concept to specific mechanism to human consequence — gives the argument clear direction and cumulative force.
The word "asylum" was once commonly a synonym for a sanctuary or safe haven from oppression. However, in his text Asylums, Erving Goffman made it clear that such institutions were more often warehouses for the mentally ill — or the so-called mentally ill — rather than places of refuge, much less mental rehabilitation. Goffman's persuasive and wide-ranging critique of the mental health institutionalization system led to the rapid deinstitutionalization of mental patients in the era following the publication of Asylums in 1962.
Like the military, the process of inculcation into the rhythms of life within a mental institution is what Erving Goffman calls the process of becoming socialized into the role of an inmate in a "Total Institution" — one where the institution becomes a part of the inmate's fragile sense of self, rather than simply the place where he or she resides. (12–17) The characteristics of Total Institutions are particularly insidious in the context of mental institutions because, although they are supposedly designed to cure or at least temper inmate pathology, mental institutions have deeply pathological features in their own procedural construction.
As "Total Institutions" akin to prisons, they often produce pathological methods of living, of dealing with life, and of building a sense of self. For individuals with the most fragile sense of personal identity, the institutionalization process within the asylum can therefore be harrowing and self-defeating.
Total institutions are characterized by what Goffman terms "batch living," in which the three spheres of home, work, and play are collapsed into one — unlike the separated, non-routine rhythms of normal domestic life. Life in an asylum can be described as the antithesis of domestic living and, equally, the antithesis of preparing inmates to reenter that world. This collapse of ordinary life's boundaries contributes to a prison-like atmosphere. The total institution of the asylum is further characterized by what Goffman calls a structure of "binary management," meaning that staff and inmates inhabit essentially different areas, operate under different rules, and thus live in fundamentally different worlds.
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.