This paper examines attitudes toward homosexuality in ancient Greek society through the lens of three major literary works: Homer's Iliad, Aristophanes' Lysistrata, and the surviving fragments of Sappho's poetry. It argues that homosexual relationships — particularly between older and younger males — were widely accepted and even encouraged in classical Greece, largely because marriage was a social and political institution rather than an emotional bond. The paper traces the "erastes/eromenos" model through the relationship of Achilles and Patroclus, analyzes Lysistrata's comic treatment of male homosexuality as a domestic obstacle, and considers Sappho's affirmation of female same-sex love as equally legitimate and emotionally fulfilling.
The paper demonstrates effective use of close reading combined with historical contextualization. Rather than imposing modern categories of sexual identity onto ancient texts, the writer explicitly notes that the Greeks did not classify people as homosexual or heterosexual, then reads passages from the Iliad against that framework. This careful historicizing prevents anachronism and strengthens the paper's analytical credibility.
The paper opens with a broad social overview of Greek attitudes toward homosexuality, then narrows to the pederastic model (erastes/eromenos) before applying that model to three specific literary cases: Achilles and Patroclus in Homer, male homosexuality in Lysistrata, and female same-sex love in Sappho. A synthesizing conclusion ties all three examples back to the central argument about love, marriage, and emotional fulfillment in ancient Greek society.
Ancient Greek art and literature clearly demonstrate that homosexual relationships were acceptable under certain conditions. In fact, some homosexual relationships were considered not only acceptable but encouraged. In the period between around 600 B.C. and the beginning of the Christian era, male homosexuality was seen as in line with Greek social values such as military prowess, athletic ability, and the ideal of youth and beauty. Because Greek society viewed women as morally and intellectually inferior, these homosexual relationships often gave men a closeness and bond not usually found in their marriages.
On the other hand, female homosexuality, while an acceptable practice in some areas, was not as universally socially acceptable as male homosexuality. It has been suggested by some ancient authors that in certain places — Sparta, for example — it was a common practice for older women to have homosexual relationships with younger, unmarried girls. But in places like Athens, it is believed that female homosexual relationships were not only discouraged but may have been forbidden.
Unlike the modern world, the ancient Greeks did not classify a person as either homosexual or heterosexual. Sexual desire could be inspired by persons of either sex; what mattered was their attractiveness. While most men married women and produced children, the husband-wife relationship was not based on personal feelings of love but on other social factors. Therefore, most marriages were not between two people who loved each other, and this led to individuals seeking emotional fulfillment from other sources. Possible partners could always be prostitutes and slaves, but if a citizen wanted to engage in an emotionally fulfilling relationship with another person, their choices were limited. In the classical world, males congregated with males and females with females, and they usually did not mix socially unless they were married. This meant that individuals who wanted emotional fulfillment were often compelled to look within their own gender for love and tenderness.
The most common form of homosexual relationship was between an older male and an adolescent. The term pederastia, translating as "boy love," described a relationship between what was known as the erastes — the older man — and the eromenos — the younger boy. Although there is some scholarly disagreement, one example of this type of relationship has traditionally been represented by the characters of Achilles and Patroclus in Homer's Iliad. Homer does not specifically describe any sexual acts between the two, but he does make many references to their love for each other. In the ancient world, it was commonly assumed that the two were in fact homosexual lovers as well as emotional partners. As the more famous and more aggressive of the two, Achilles was thought to have assumed the role of the older man, the erastes, while Patroclus assumed the role of the youthful eromenos.
Many historians and literary scholars point to the relationship between Achilles and Patroclus as romantic — that is, homosexual in nature. For instance, in Book Nine, when Achilles is angry with Agamemnon and refuses to fight, many of his comrades join him in his tent. Achilles asks Patroclus to set up a mixing-bowl for what they call "stronger drink," and Patroclus is described as obeying "his beloved companion" (Iliad 9.205). Descriptions of Patroclus are filled with words like beloved, indicating that the two may indeed have shared a deep emotional attachment. While ancient Greek culture did not expect there to be love between a husband and wife, it did expect love to exist between male companions. What is most significant is not whether the two physically engaged in sexual intercourse, but that they shared a profound emotional bond. In that sense, they were lovers.
Many modern scholars prefer to read the relationship between these two characters as non-physical. There are descriptions of both men sleeping with women, suggesting they used female companions strictly for physical pleasure. In one passage, Achilles is described as resting "in the inward corner of the strong-built shelter, and a woman lay beside him…" (Iliad 9.664). Patroclus, too, appears to have engaged in sexual relations with women: "in the other corner Patroclus went to bed, with him also was a girl…" (Iliad 9.666). This would seem to indicate that both men engaged in sexual intercourse with women as a common practice. Yet it also demonstrates a closeness between the two, as they share quarters and spend their nights in the same space.
Ultimately, Achilles' reaction to the death of Patroclus reveals the depth of his commitment and love. In a conversation with his goddess mother, Achilles admits that he loved Patroclus "beyond all other companions, as well as my own life…" (Iliad 18.81–82). While ancient Greece did not look unkindly on homosexual relationships between men, there is no direct evidence that such a relationship was explicitly physical between Achilles and Patroclus. Homer implies that the two were lovers but never describes any sexual contact. Perhaps the two did experience the love and companionship typically associated with marriage, along with full physical intimacy, and Homer simply omitted mention of it because such a relationship was assumed. Just as in the modern world one does not need to state explicitly that a husband and wife have sexual relations — it is commonly assumed — the same may have been true of Achilles and Patroclus.
In ancient Greek culture, homosexuality was generally accepted between males and, depending on location, only partially accepted between females. These relationships existed in large part because the modern concept of marriage between loving partners was not the norm, and men and women generally remained segregated from each other in society. Marriages were social and political alliances made primarily for the creation of legitimate offspring. Love and emotional fulfillment were most often found in homosexual relationships rather than in marriage.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.