This paper offers a comparative literary analysis of three novels — John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, Bharati Mukherjee's Jasmine, and Maxine Hong Kingston's China Men — examining how each uses migration as a narrative framework to explore the reshaping of individual and collective identity. The essay traces how economic upheaval, gender roles, ethnicity, and cultural displacement force characters to renegotiate selfhood at the crossroads of history. Drawing on close textual readings and attention to literary technique — including Steinbeck's rhythmic prose, Mukherjee's mythic imagery, and Kingston's blending of autobiography with fiction — the paper argues that all three novels challenge official historical narratives by centering the stories of people whose identities were profoundly altered by exile.
The paper demonstrates sustained comparative analysis: each novel is read on its own terms before being set in dialogue with the others. The writer identifies a shared structural pattern — the mythologizing of migration — and shows how Steinbeck, Mukherjee, and Kingston each employ it differently depending on their cultural and historical context. This technique allows the essay to make claims that are larger than any single text while still being anchored in specific evidence.
The essay opens with a theoretical framing paragraph establishing the relationship between migration, history, and identity. It then devotes a substantial section to The Grapes of Wrath, covering both its social realism and mythic dimensions. Jasmine follows, with particular attention to gender and naming as identity markers. China Men is treated last, foregrounding questions of historiography and cultural stereotype. A brief conclusion ties the three novels back to the overarching thesis. This sequence moves from collective to individual to hybrid identity, creating a coherent argumentative arc.
Over the course of history, migration and colonization have brought different cultures and ethnicities into close contact with each other. This contact has influenced the shaping and definition of both individual and collective identity. Many modern and postmodern narratives therefore discuss the relationship between individual identity and collective identity, and between personal or autobiographical facts and historical facts. These narratives often challenge the claims made by official histories, pointing to the great number of stories that can actually be derived from what is usually called "the objective reality."
John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath, Bharati Mukherjee's Jasmine, and Maxine Hong Kingston's China Men are three major, representative novels that focus on the molding of individual identity in the flux of history. Each centers on individual stories incorporated into larger ethnic and racial sagas. The literary techniques employed by the authors are crucial, since their primary focus is on the various representations of identity. All three books use a narrative of migration and exploration of new territories to represent the way in which individual identity is shaped by history. Although they use different contexts and settings, all three novels observe the same theme: the way in which migration and exile modify the initial coordinates of identity. The individual is set against a complex background of historical changes that reshape the backbone of his or her identity. What these stories ultimately achieve is a retelling of history that focuses on the individuals and communities whose identity was affected by major upheaval.
John Steinbeck's monumental novel The Grapes of Wrath documents the migration of land workers from Oklahoma to California during the Great Depression, focusing on the impact of economic crisis on the lives of ordinary individuals. The novel does not tackle problems related to ethnicity so much as it attempts to capture the moment in which capitalism, with its monster-corporations, took over individual labor. While the central characters are the Joad family, who are forced to leave their home and travel to California in search of work, Steinbeck's powerful descriptions give a panoramic view of the major changes taking place in America at that time. The Grapes of Wrath is the collective story of a people swept over by tremendous and unstoppable historical forces.
The author uses a poetic prose, selecting harsh and rugged words, employing numerous repetitions, and sometimes incorporating long dialogues into the rhythm of the prose so that the flow of words continues unbroken. This rhythmic prose is a vital element of the novel, conveying the story of migration in the form of a chant and intensifying the impression of flow or drift. The roll of the narrative mirrors the sweeping forces of history and change that ensnare the helpless individual. At the same time, these technical devices create the effect of a story delivered orally, in chant-like speech. Everything is reported rather than brought close to the present moment. This technique is not accidental: Steinbeck focuses on the story of a community, its migration, and its subsequent transformation. The first half of the narrative witnesses the gradual collapse and disappearance of an entire community.
The changes portrayed in the novel go even deeper than that. It is not only the isolated community in Oklahoma that is permanently transformed, but the very face of time and humanity's way of life on earth. The emergence of capitalism resembles a multi-headed monster that takes control of the land, of possessions, and of the individuals themselves. The "Bank" in the novel symbolizes the grand corporations that become the owners of the land, permanently cutting off the individual and the community from it. In his poetic prose, Steinbeck details this rupture dramatically. The community can no longer relate directly to the ancient land it felt so connected to; everything is now mediated by the "Bank," the careless monster that targets only profit. It is the very change from the natural to the abstract, from the living and breathing land as possession to the abstract numbers and statistics held by the bank.
Steinbeck's story thus acquires an almost mythological value as it details the fall of man and his way of life from wholeness and harmony into division and abstraction. The novel opens with images of the dustlands of Oklahoma — a dry area where the land is poor and drought often ruins the crop. Nevertheless, this picture is not nearly as desolate as the images of emptiness that follow. Despite the poor quality of the land, the men who live on it can still find ways to carry on, as long as their possessions and families hold together in one community. All this is shattered, however, once the real owners of the land, the "Bank," come and tell people they must leave the land in which their very identity is rooted.
Steinbeck alludes to another time of great change, when land passed from the hands of native peoples into those of new colonizers. At that time, civilization had a violent encounter with more primitive ways of life and took control by force. Now, however, the situation is still more difficult because the change is even more radical. The people are no longer fighting other people but capitalism itself, which acts as an abstract and impersonal force. The fight is unequal, and the people cannot win against the "Bank": "It's not us, it's the bank. A bank isn't like a man. Or an owner with fifty thousand acres, he isn't like a man either. That's the monster. Sure, cried the tenant men, but it's our land. We measured it and broke it up. We were born on it, and we got killed on it, died on it. Even if it's no good, it's still ours. That's what makes it ours — being born on it, working it, dying on it. That makes ownership, not a paper with numbers on it." (Steinbeck 36)
People are truly powerless in this struggle, fighting against something inhuman even though it was created and is conducted by human beings. The tenants try to resist, but they are inevitably defeated: "The tenants cried, Grampa killed Indians, Pa killed snakes for the land. Maybe we can kill banks — they're worse than Indians and snakes. Maybe we got to fight to keep our land, like Pa and Grampa did." (Steinbeck 37) One example of this resistance is Muley Graves, one of the villagers, who lingers in the empty and desolated land, wandering alone and living primitively in his inability to leave everything behind and face the change.
The mythical quality of Steinbeck's work becomes apparent precisely in the way he portrays this major rupture between man and nature, and between man and humanity itself. Civilization brings new ways of life that upend the original order. The use of the word "monster" to describe the machinery of capitalism is revealing: "[...] the monster that sent the tractor out had somehow got into the driver's hands, into his brain and muscle, had goggled him and muzzled him — goggled his mind, muzzled his speech, goggled his perception, muzzled his protest. He could not see the land as it was, he could not smell the land as it smelled; his feet did not stamp the clods or feel the warmth and power of the earth. He sat in an iron seat and stepped on iron pedals." (Steinbeck 39) It is not only the identity of a community that is at stake in this migration narrative, but the very backbone of humanity, altered significantly by civilization.
Steinbeck thus drafts at once a story of migration and an attempt to capture the archetypes of the modern world. The story focuses on the fall of human life from wholeness into fragmentation: "Carbon is not a man, nor salt nor water nor calcium. He is all these, but he is much more, much more; and the land is so much more than its analysis. The man who is more than his chemistry, walking on the earth, turning his plow point for a stone, dropping his handles to slide over an outcropping, kneeling in the earth to eat his lunch." (Steinbeck 128) The Grapes of Wrath portrays the dissolving of an entire community and of a long stage in the history of humanity, and its replacement by new coordinates for life brought about by capitalism.
Another story that tackles identity in exile is that of Jyoti/Jasmine/Jane, the main character of Bharati Mukherjee's novel Jasmine. While Steinbeck's story focused largely on the panorama of a huge transformation and the migration of an entire community, Mukherjee's story is restricted to the lives of a few characters, with Jasmine naturally the most important of them. However, the novel's purpose is similar to Steinbeck's: by setting two very different ways of life against each other, it captures history at its crossroads, with identity wavering between the old and the new.
The name of the novel is highly significant. "Jasmine" is the name that best symbolizes the moment in which the character stands at the very crossroads of her identity. Jyoti, her actual name, is the symbol of her old, conventional, and tradition-bound personality ingrained with Indian customs, while Jane is the name she acquires once she is already in exile in the United States. Jasmine, on the other hand, is the name her first husband gave her as an endearment and as a way of breaking down her old conceptions: "He wanted to break down the Jyoti I'd been in Hasnapur and make me a new kind of city woman. To break off the past he gave me a new name: Jasmine. He said, 'You're small and sweet and heady, my Jasmine. You'll quicken the whole world with your perfume.' Jyoti, Jasmine: I shuttled between identities." (Mukherjee 77)
It is during her short first marriage to Prakash that Jasmine first glimpses the contrast between the old Indian way of life and the modern Western one. It is also at this point that her sense of identity first wavers, since she is caught between her ingrained sense of duty and a new and freer way of thinking. An eloquent example of Jasmine's shaken sense of identity is her confession that, although not yet fifteen years old, she felt envious of friends who had become pregnant at even earlier ages: "I didn't dare confess that I felt eclipsed by the Mazbi maid's daughter, who had been married off at eleven, just after me, and already had had a miscarriage." (Mukherjee 80) Gender identity is obviously questioned here as Jasmine wavers between the way she was trained to think of herself — as a passive object obligated to obey the male figure — and the new ideas she receives from her husband.
Her impulse after his death to travel to America and sacrifice herself on a college campus in Tampa, where he had once dreamed of going, is a symbol of the voice of ethnicity and cultural background within her. In the Indian tradition, a widowed woman has no right to enjoy life any further. This denotes the way in which identity is obliterated by gender definitions. As in The Grapes of Wrath, however, people are forced to begin a process of adaptation once change has taken place, so Jasmine is eventually drawn into a process of "Americanization." This cannot occur without a painful and dramatic identity rupture: "There are no harmless, compassionate ways to remake ourselves. We murder who we were so we can rebirth ourselves in the image of dreams." (Mukherjee 25)
Jasmine does not succeed in killing herself as her mission had purposed. This act would have symbolized her conformity and compliance with tradition and prescribed gender roles. Instead, she manages to "kill" her old self and adapt to a new way of life. The story carries a certain mythical quality, most apparent at the moment when Jasmine spots the new land from the ship carrying her forward. The description recalls the impression the first explorers might have had of the virgin continent: "Then suddenly in the pinkening black of pre-dawn, America caromed off the horizon. The first thing I saw were the two cones of a nuclear plant, and smoke spreading from them in complicated but seemingly purposeful patterns, edges lit by the rising sun, like a gray, intricate map of an unexplored island continent, against the pale unscratched blue of the sky. I waded through Eden's waste: plastic bottles, floating oranges, boards, sodden boxes, white and green plastic sacks tied shut but picked open by birds and pulled apart by crabs." (Mukherjee 95–96)
What is interesting here is that the process is inverted: while Jasmine is the one perceived as more "primitive," America is revealed as a false Eden — the cradle of civilization with its filth and waste, the tokens of consumerist society. Mukherjee's novel is thus also the story of a migration, seemingly focusing only on one individual who crosses the ocean from East to West, but actually symbolizing the gradual contamination of everything with the marks of civilization and change.
The three novels under discussion are portrayals of identity in exile, being primarily concerned with retelling the history of people who have migrated and whose identity has been altered substantially by the changes that followed. Whether examining the economic displacement of Dust Bowl migrants in The Grapes of Wrath, the gendered and cross-cultural fragmentation of self in Jasmine, or the contested historiography of Chinese-American experience in China Men, all three authors demonstrate that migration does not simply relocate individuals — it fundamentally transforms who they are. Together, these narratives constitute a powerful argument for reading history not only through official records but through the personal, the communal, and the hybrid stories that official history so often leaves out.
You’re 75% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.