This paper proposes six information technology initiatives designed to improve operations and patient care at a typical tertiary healthcare facility. The initiatives address: digitizing the existing paper-based patient incident reporting system for JCAHO compliance; establishing a hospital-wide electronic patient records database; trending adverse incident data for quality assurance reporting; applying IT-driven inventory control with barcode technology; implementing an interactive inpatient menu-processing system; and enhancing hospital security through web camera applications. Drawing on published research and real-world case examples, the paper argues that most required infrastructure is already in place and that integrating existing systems would yield measurable reductions in medical errors, costs, and operational inefficiencies.
The paper demonstrates proposal-style academic writing: each section identifies a gap, cites authoritative evidence for why the gap matters, then argues for a specific, implementable solution using existing infrastructure. This technique—problem/evidence/solution—is effective for policy and management papers because it links every recommendation directly to a documented need.
The paper opens with a brief framing section, then devotes a numbered section to each of six IT initiatives. Within each section, a "Description" subsection defines the current state and proposed change, while "Potential Benefits" justifies the change with evidence. A Works Cited list in MLA-adjacent format closes the paper. The overall structure mirrors a formal improvement proposal or business case document.
The following six initiatives propose practical improvements to operations and patient care at a typical tertiary healthcare facility. Each initiative leverages information technology infrastructure that is largely already in place, making implementation both feasible and cost-effective. Together, they address patient safety, records management, quality assurance, inventory control, food service, and physical security.
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has mandated that all accredited healthcare facilities maintain a system for tracking patient incidents such as falls, patient abuse, and medication errors, and that they implement corrective action when deficiencies are identified (Bryan & O'Connell 23). Although our hospital does have such a patient incident reporting system in place, it is a highly labor-intensive, paper form-based approach that requires copying and hand-delivery to the Office of Quality Assurance. This paper-based system is readily transferable to the existing hospital-wide information system intranet. The proposed online replacement should replicate the existing patient incident reporting system as closely as possible to ensure staff acceptance (Auerbach, Beckerman, Cohen, Goldstein, Quitkin & Rock 134).
Transferring the paper-based patient incident reporting system to the hospital-wide information system would allow all staff members to file a report at their earliest opportunity, while events are still fresh in their minds. This approach would also eliminate the need for reproducing forms for internal distribution, since information would be readily available through the intranet. In addition, if Initiative 3 (described below) is adopted, this information could be incorporated into the bi-weekly quality assurance report disseminated to all medical center services.
According to Warner, Beth Israel uses this type of approach with their online database, called CareWeb, which contains records for more than 9 million patients. A computerized system automates orders for all prescriptions, lab tests, and IV drips; clinician requests are checked against patient data to ensure there are no drug interactions or allergies involved. All clinician requests are then automatically routed to the pharmacy or lab. The results have been impressive: "Illegible prescriptions, the bane of pharmacists everywhere, are a thing of the past. So are many medication-related errors, which have dropped 50% since the system was installed in 2001" (Warner 87). A number of healthcare organizations across the country have also begun using their IT systems to reduce error rates in lab work (Manyika & Nevens 19) and to improve monitoring of adverse drug reactions (Andrus, Herndon, Kelley & Murphy 30).
The importance of this initiative cannot be overstated, both from an accreditation perspective and, more importantly, from a patient care perspective. According to a 1999 report from the Institute of Medicine, between 44,000 and 98,000 Americans die each year due to preventable medical errors. This means more Americans die annually from medical errors than from motor vehicle accidents (43,458), breast cancer (42,297), or AIDS (16,516). Total national costs of medical errors resulting in injury are estimated at between $17 billion and $29 billion, of which healthcare costs represent more than 50%. The increased hospital costs of preventable medication-related errors to patients alone are estimated at approximately $2 billion for the nation as a whole (Bryan & O'Connell 24).
The medical center's existing hospital information system should be used to make patient medical records available to all clinicians who need them.
According to Dujat, Haux, Schmucker, and Winter, the large numbers of inpatients and outpatients treated in a typical tertiary care hospital generate enormous amounts of medical documentation. "Due to legal regulations, these medical records have to be stored for 30 years," they note, and "this implies spatial, organizational, and economical problems. At present, conventional archiving in hospitals often does not satisfy the need to make medical records available for health-care professionals in a systematic and timely manner" (Dujat et al. 97). Like many tertiary healthcare organizations, information required for a wide range of healthcare applications is already being managed by several autonomous medical information systems, including our hospital information system (HIS) (Breant, Taira & Huang 88). Many healthcare organizations have the technology and infrastructure in place to realize greater benefits from their IT investments; however, some have failed to integrate their existing technology purposefully (Manyika & Nevens 18).
The healthcare industry in the United States in general, and this medical center in particular, have invested heavily in IT based on the belief that it represents a key strategic factor in improving patient care and reducing costs. Hospitals in the United States were estimated to have invested more than $75 billion a year by the end of 2004 (Chadra, Knickrehm & Miller 91). Unfortunately, our medical center has failed to take full advantage of the extensive patient medical records database maintained by the Medical Records Service — though it is not alone in this regard.
As Warner (2004) points out, "Most hospitals don't have computer systems that let doctors instantly view a patient's past records, saving life-or-death seconds.... Some 80% of hospitals and 95% of doctor's offices use the same methods for storing and accessing patient data that they did 50 years ago — which is to say, sheets of paper and film buried in huge metal cabinets" (85). Information systems can vastly improve the collection, storage, retrieval, use, analysis, and dissemination of patient records, test results, and a wide range of clinical encounters (Alpert 302).
One medical center that adopted this approach in a major way was Kansas Spine Hospital in Wichita, a facility specializing in neurosurgery, spinal surgery, pain management, and radiology. This hospital was among the first in the country to fully digitalize its inpatients' medical records — including prescriptions, clinical records, x-rays, and other radiology images — and to make them accessible to authorized personnel through its hospital information system ("Just the Right Prescription" 24).
The six initiatives presented here share a common thread: the infrastructure required to implement them largely already exists within the typical tertiary healthcare facility. By integrating and extending existing hospital information systems, administrators can reduce preventable medical errors, improve quality assurance, streamline operations, and enhance security — all while maximizing the return on IT investments already made.
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.