This essay compares the philosophical views of Leucippus and Paul-Henri Thiry (Baron) d'Holbach on the causes of human behavior. Both thinkers are fundamentally materialists: Leucippus grounds all causation in atomic motion, while Holbach frames nature as matter and motion expressed through chains of cause and effect. The essay examines where their views converge — particularly in rejecting moral or supernatural explanations of behavior — and where they diverge, especially regarding Holbach's allowance for peculiar properties of different types of matter and his reluctance to demand purely reductive explanations of mental events.
The paper demonstrates comparative philosophical analysis: it identifies a shared premise (materialism), then systematically isolates the point of divergence (Holbach's acceptance of "peculiar properties" for different types of matter versus Leucippus's uniform atomist reductionism). This technique — establish common ground, then isolate difference — is a core move in philosophical comparison essays.
The essay opens by introducing both thinkers as materialists, then elaborates Leucippus's atomism, then presents Holbach's position, and finally draws explicit comparisons and contrasts. The conclusion is embedded in the final paragraph rather than set apart, which works for a short-form philosophical comparison. Citations follow MLA format with Works Cited at the end.
Both Leucippus and Paul-Henri Thiry (Baron) d'Holbach may be fundamentally characterized as materialists in their philosophical orientations. Each thinker, in his own way, sought to explain human behavior and the workings of the universe without appeal to supernatural forces or moral categories — grounding all causation instead in the physical world.
Leucippus is regarded as the founding father of atomism — the idea that human beings and everything else in the universe are composed of tiny, indivisible particles called atoms that are constantly in motion. In this framework, all causes of events and behaviors can ultimately be attributed to atomic phenomena. Atoms are indestructible and unchanging in their essence. As Berryman explains, "in the atomist system, change only occurs at the level of appearances: the real constituents of being persist unchanged, merely rearranging themselves into new combinations that form the world of appearance" (Berryman 2002).
Holbach similarly holds that nature consists only of matter and motion. As LeBuffe summarizes, nature "is known to us, when it can be known, as a sequence of causes and effects" on a material level (LeBuffe 2002). To understand human beings and human society in Holbach's terms is therefore "simply to understand them in terms of causes and effects," not morality (LeBuffe 2002).
However, unlike Leucippus, Holbach is not solely interested in the science of materialism and is more willing to entertain different explanations for specific types of matter. For Holbach, there is more to be understood than the mere rearrangement of material essences at the level of appearance: "Determinism is universal, in Holbach's view, but different sorts of bodies may have peculiar properties that require peculiar explanations. Despite his avowed materialism, Holbach does not demand the sorts of reductive explanations of mental events that materialism might ordinarily seem to require" (LeBuffe 2002). Holbach thus finds meaningful unpredictability in the behavior of different types of matter — attending to what Leucippus might dismiss as mere surface differences.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.