This paper examines the wide-ranging impact of long-term care on families, caregivers, and society. It explores how shifting family structures — including rising divorce rates, histories of abuse, and women's increased workforce participation — affect informal caregiving. The paper addresses the growing shortage of formal long-term care workers, the financial burden placed on both families and government, and the unique challenges facing minority caregivers. It also analyzes the physical and emotional toll on home caregivers, identifying major sources of stress including social isolation, relationship strain, and constant worry. The paper concludes by evaluating emerging policy responses and the role of social workers in supporting home caregivers.
The paper effectively uses evidence synthesis — drawing on sociology, health policy, and gerontology literature — to support a single unified argument about the underacknowledged burden on informal caregivers. Rather than simply summarizing sources, it integrates findings from multiple studies to reveal patterns across populations, including minority groups and divorced families.
The paper opens with a broad introduction establishing the scope of long-term care challenges, then narrows through thematic sections covering social determinants of caregiving, workforce shortages, financial and societal impacts, the role of social workers, and caregiver health effects. It closes with a policy-oriented solutions section. This funnel structure — broad to specific, problem to solution — is well-suited to a social issues research paper at the undergraduate level.
Long-term care can be needed for a variety of reasons, including accident injuries, debilitating or chronic illness, or simply the effects of aging. There are times when persons cannot care for themselves and must rely on others for their daily needs. Sometimes that care takes place in a facility designed to provide such services. However, in many cases the burden of caring for loved ones falls on family members or even friends. Long-term care places a significant strain on people financially, and this has historically been the primary focus of health care policy. Yet there is an often-overlooked dimension of long-term care.
Long-term care carries many emotional issues as well — not only for the patient, but for the caregiver. These issues can cause a variety of difficulties, including depression, fatigue, and stress, and can even contribute to family breakdown. Such issues place an even greater burden on the broader healthcare system and on society as a whole, and they must be considered when developing new long-term health care policies.
The problems associated with long-term health care for the elderly and the chronically ill have many facets. Long-term health care in facilities such as nursing homes is expensive, and the United States is facing a growing shortage of health care workers to care for the elderly — a trend that is expected to worsen. In many cases, families choose to care for the person at home rather than incur potentially devastating costs. When family care is not an option and the family lacks the resources to pay, the government must cover the cost. Caring for a patient at home is also costly and often places an incredible financial strain on the family. The following research explores these issues from multiple angles and discusses potential solutions.
There was a time when long-term care facilities did not exist and the entire burden of caring for the elderly or sick rested with the family. Many still believe this is how it should be; however, family structures are changing, and this assumption has been shown to be a myth (Montgomery, 1999). This shifting family structure means that an increasing number of elderly persons are relying on long-term care facilities to replace the traditional family role.
Divorce rates have been climbing for many years, and the traditional nuclear family is quickly being redefined. As a result, there are now more elderly people who are divorced. The effects of this trend are visible in the long-term care these elders are likely to receive from their children. Divorce can harm family ties and often creates feelings of resentment or rejection among family members. According to a study conducted by Shone and Pezzin (1999), divorce makes it less likely that families will help each other financially or in terms of physical care. The key findings were that adult children of divorced parents were less likely to receive financial assistance from those parents. In addition, stepparents were less likely to receive care from their stepchildren than biological parents were. The study also found that remarriage further reduced the likelihood that an elderly person would receive care (Shone and Pezzin, 1999).
A history of abuse or neglect in the family may also be a factor in whether elderly persons receive care from their children. Child abuse and neglect sever family ties and can have a lasting impact on whether a person receives care in their elder years (CASA, 2001). This is often an overlooked long-term effect of child abuse. While many focus on the immediate social costs, the willingness to provide eldercare is a downstream consequence of childhood abuse and neglect. Current studies tend to focus on the effects on the abused person alone, failing to account for the impact of broken family ties later in life.
Studies have indicated that men and women near retirement age whose parents are still living are spending less time caring for them or assisting with daily tasks such as household chores (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Women's growing participation in the workforce may contribute to this trend. Parental health was found to be a key predictor of whether an elderly person would receive assistance from their children (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Health was a factor in determining whether children provided basic personal care, such as feeding or dressing, but was not a significant factor in help with daily chores and errands (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000).
Geographic proximity was also identified as a predictor of whether children helped care for their parents. Children who lived closer to their parents were more likely to provide help than those who lived far away (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). When both parents were alive, children were less likely to step in, as the surviving spouse typically provided primary care. Interestingly, mid-life children who had young children at home or faced their own family challenges — such as an ill spouse — were not significantly less likely to provide help to an elderly parent (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000).
As the population ages, the United States is facing a shortage of workers to provide care for the elderly (Weiner et al., 2000). According to Weiner and associates (2000), poor working conditions are partly to blame for the current crisis. Long-term care workers face low wages, poor benefits, heavy workloads, inadequate working conditions, and a lack of professional respect. These factors make the profession susceptible to high turnover and difficulty in recruiting new workers. This problem is expected to worsen before any improvement is seen.
The number of elderly persons receiving formalized long-term care from a licensed facility is expected to double over the next 30 years (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Much of this care will be funded with public money, placing a growing financial burden on government budgets. Nursing home expenditures increased from $17.4 billion in 1970 to $84.7 billion in 1997 (expressed in 1997 dollars) (Health Care Financing Administration, 1998).
When a family decides to care for a loved one at home, many do not fully appreciate the costs involved — some financial, others less easily measurable. The caregiver must often balance paid employment with providing care. A 1996 study revealed that approximately 10.5% of all elderly patients being cared for at home were unable to perform basic tasks such as feeding themselves, getting out of bed, or dressing (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Adult children account for 42% of all caregivers for unmarried elderly persons receiving non-institutional care (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000).
Research on caregiving in foreign countries and among ethnic groups in the United States has produced results that differ from those conducted on mainstream populations. In Japan, for example, one study found that those caring for totally disabled elderly persons showed more signs of stress than those caring for partially disabled individuals (Yumiko and Washio, 1999). Socio-cultural factors have been identified as important considerations when evaluating caregiving among ethnic groups, and family structure was found to be a key variable (Dilworth-Anderson and Gibson, 1999). Ho et al. (2000) found that minority caregivers to persons with dementia used fewer outside social and medical services than white, European-American caregivers, citing cultural and structural factors as explanations. The same study found that minority caregivers often experienced higher levels of stress than their European-American counterparts. A separate study focusing exclusively on African-American caregivers produced similar findings (Cox, 1999).
Caring for an elderly parent leaves less time for other activities, including paid work. The more assistance the person needs, the greater the time demands on the caregiver. Activities such as meal preparation and transportation to medical appointments can make it difficult to maintain regular work hours. The true effects of eldercare on the labor force are difficult to measure, as many of the consequences resist easy quantification (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Persons who reduce their work hours to care for a loved one lose more than reduced income — they also forfeit retirement savings, employment benefits, and health care coverage. This compounds the strain on the caregiver in multiple dimensions.
Few public assistance programs exist to support those who care for elderly patients at home. The Clinton administration enacted a tax credit of $3,000 for persons providing at-home care to those needing assistance (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). Several emerging programs aim to provide respite care and other services for caregivers. The Omnibus Long-Term Care Act of 1999 (H.R. 2691) would have provided Medicare benefits and Social Security credits to workers who leave their jobs to care for frail parents (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000). These measures represent early steps toward alleviating caregiver burden, though they fall short of what many families need.
Many advocates argue this area deserves far greater policy attention. The cost of long-term care in a formal facility far exceeds the costs incurred when a patient is cared for at home on a permanent basis. Some policy makers now favor subsidies for persons who remain at home to care for loved ones, arguing that this approach would save more money than it costs by reducing demand for expensive formal care facilities (Johnson and Lo Sasso, 2000).
At first glance, this appears to be a solution for multiple stakeholders: government spending on long-term care facilities could decrease, and home caregivers could recover lost income and benefits. However, opponents note that the solution may not be as straightforward as it seems. No comprehensive studies have been conducted to determine whether an adequate supply of willing caregivers exists to meet demand, nor whether the proposed subsidies would be sufficient to maintain a decent standard of living. It is unlikely that a high-income earner would voluntarily trade a professional salary for a minimal subsidy. Without further study, this policy direction may create as many problems as it resolves.
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.