This paper examines the need for standardized care protocols for diabetic foot ulcers in long-term care settings. Diabetes mellitus, often called "the silent killer," affects millions of Americans, with foot ulcers representing a significant complication that can lead to amputation or death. The paper reviews peer-reviewed literature to establish that implementing standard care guidelines would improve patient quality of life, reduce infection risk, prevent amputations, decrease healthcare costs, and enhance patient functionality. The research demonstrates that without consistent standards across long-term care facilities, the growing population of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetic patients faces preventable severe complications. Effective standards of care represent a critical intervention for both patient outcomes and healthcare system efficiency.
Known as "the silent killer" because its symptoms can go undiagnosed until the condition becomes deadly, diabetes mellitus remains a major public health threat in the United States today. One of the more common afflictions suffered by people with diabetes mellitus is foot ulcers, a problem that can result in the need for amputation or even more severe clinical outcomes, including death. To determine why there should be a standard of care in place for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in long-term care patients, this paper provides a review of relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature, followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning diabetic foot ulcers.
There has been growing concern among practitioners in the healthcare community about the persistent prevalence of diabetes mellitus and the need for identifying preventive protocols for foot ulcers in long-term care settings (Fidler, 2009). Addressing this problem can contribute to American society by improving the quality of life of foot ulcer sufferers and by reducing the economic toll the condition exacts on the healthcare system. For instance, during the 2-year period from 1995 to 1997, the number of individuals diagnosed with diabetes increased dramatically from 8 million to 10.3 million people (Fidler, 2009).
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) reports that these figures have continued to increase each year since that time (Fidler, 2009). In 1998, there were approximately 15.7 million people (59%) in the United States with diabetes, but the CDC also projects that at least another 5.3 million people have diabetes but remain undiagnosed (Fidler, 2009). In this regard, Fidler concludes that diabetes is a "silent killer" that is "of great concern due to the number of complications, including a variety of diabetic foot problems, that can afflict this group of patients" (2009, p. 35).
There should be a standard of care in place for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in long-term care patients because improving this problem would enhance the quality of life for diabetic foot ulcer sufferers and reduce the comorbidities associated with the condition (Prentice & Ritchie, 2011). In this regard, Fidler (2009) advises that effective standards of care for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers can improve the following: (a) patients' quality of life, (b) infection control, (c) prevention of amputation, (d) reduction in healthcare costs, and (e) maintenance of patient health status.
Furthermore, treatment for foot ulcer-related complications can improve patient functionality and increase self-sufficiency in daily living activities, thereby reducing the workload on long-term care facility staff (Fidler, 2009). Standardized protocols that address foot care education alongside medication management and glucose monitoring create consistent outcomes across facilities and patient populations.
The prevention of foot ulcer-related amputations is an effective way to reduce the costs of healthcare staff needed to care for these patients (Fidler, 2009). In fact, reducing the direct costs of healthcare as well as the indirect costs associated with diabetic foot ulcers represents one of the overarching objectives for health care providers and patients alike (Fidler, 2009). Amputation creates cascading expenses—increased nursing hours, prosthetic care, rehabilitation services, and extended facility stays—that far exceed the cost of preventive foot care protocols.
At present, the medical management of diabetes mellitus cases remains suboptimal in many long-term care settings (Ebersole & Hess, 1999). Moreover, Ebersole and Hess (1999) emphasize that standards of care for patients with diabetes mellitus demand rigorous patient oversight. For instance, Ebersole and Hess note that, "Meticulous management of the diabetic is required to reduce the risk of long-term complications and avert acute problems" (1999, p. 278).
Current interventions for patients in long-term care facilities at risk of developing diabetes-related foot ulcers include: (a) patient education regarding medications, (b) nutrition, (c) exercise, (d) foot care, (e) stress management, and (f) serum glucose monitoring (Ebersole & Hess, 1999). However, without standardized protocols ensuring consistent application of these interventions across all facilities, compliance and effectiveness remain variable. Standardized foot care includes regular inspection, appropriate footwear, prompt treatment of wounds, and professional podiatric evaluation, all elements that require institutional policy to ensure universal implementation.
"Patient education and provider oversight prevent complications"
The research showed that there should be a standard of care in place for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in long-term care patients because the problem persists and, absent effective standards, the millions of diagnosed and undiagnosed patients are at increased risk of having one or more of their feet amputated. Beyond the enormous toll that such an eventuality has on the affected patients, these adverse clinical outcomes also add to the already enormous monetary costs involved in the management of diabetes mellitus in the United States today. In the final analysis, it is reasonable to conclude that the problem will continue to persist unless and until appropriate standards of care are implemented in all American long-term care facilities.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.