This paper examines the central themes of Mark Twain's short story "The Story of the Good Little Boy," focusing on the character of Jacob Blivens, a boy whose relentless pursuit of goodness consistently leads to misfortune. The paper argues that Twain's primary thematic statement is that people who do good things are not always rewarded, and that being good for the wrong reasons yields no moral benefit. Drawing on secondary sources by Harrell, Kolb, and Lyttle, the paper traces Jacob's failed acts of benevolence and connects Twain's satirical style and recurring themes of death to his personal experiences with loss.
Mark Twain — the pseudonym of Samuel Clemens — is a widely acclaimed American writer. In his short story The Story of the Good Little Boy, the primary character, a boy named Jacob Blivens, is portrayed as a genuinely virtuous child. Yet Jacob quickly comes to the realization that good boys do not always receive acknowledgment for their goodness (Twain, "Good Little Boy," paraphrased). The central premise of Twain's story is that "people who do good things are not always appreciated and rewarded" (Harrell, p. 1). This observation rings true in the modern world and appears to have been equally relevant in Twain's own time. The objective of this paper is to examine Twain's thematic statement, explain why it is so important to the story, and trace the theme's development across the narrative.
According to Harrell (2011), many of Jacob's actions were carried out in a self-righteous manner and "contributed to his ambition of having his life in what he called a 'Sunday school book'" (Twain, "A Good Little Boy," 604). In short, Jacob was doing the right things, but for entirely the wrong reasons (Harrell, 2011, p. 2). He is described as a "submissive child who always obeyed his parents, never lied, and never played hooky, even if it was for the wrong reasons that he did those things" (Kolb, 660, cited in Harrell, 2011, p. 2). Jacob was, in fact, consumed with doing good at every opportunity.
One telling example from the story involves Jacob adopting a lame dog — only to be bitten by it. On another occasion, while scolding a thief for stealing apples, Jacob fell from the tree and broke his arm. His so-called good deeds invariably went wrong in the end. His attempts to be a good boy ultimately paved the way for his final undoing, when his "career of misfired benevolence abruptly ends when he interferes with a group of boys" (Kolb, 660, cited in Harrell, 2011, p. 3). As Mark Twain himself suggests, Jacob was so intent on being honest that he became simply ridiculous (p. 1).
The curious nature of Jacob's behavior extended to even the smallest amusements: "He wouldn't play marbles on Sunday, he wouldn't rob birds' nests, he wouldn't give hot pennies to organ-grinders' monkeys; he didn't seem to take any interest in any kind of rational amusement" (Twain, p. 1). When Jacob read stories about good little boys in Sunday school books, he longed to travel thousands of miles just to gaze upon them (Twain, p. 1). However, he always turned to the final chapter first — and found, invariably, that the good little boy died at the end.
Jacob strove to be good in many other ways as well. He once tried to assist a blind man, only to receive a blow from the man's cane in return. He attempted to warn a group of boys who were sailing on Sunday that they were in error — only to slip on a log, nearly drown, and spend many weeks bedridden. Each effort at virtue ended in misfortune, reinforcing the story's central irony.
"Satire, death themes, and Twain's biographical influences"
"Restates moral theme and final assessment"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.