This paper examines the political philosophies of James Madison and Karl Marx, asking which form of government holds a legitimate right to rule. Drawing on Madison's Federalist No. 10 and Marx's Communist Manifesto, the paper traces how both thinkers grounded their political ideals in the concept of human freedom, despite arriving at radically different conclusions. Madison championed representative democracy as the best mechanism for preserving individual liberty, while Marx argued that only a classless, communist society could fully liberate humanity from centuries of class antagonism. The paper concludes that both ideologies possess a foundational legitimacy rooted in freedom, and that their ultimate success depends on a society's political will to uphold that freedom for all.
Two of the most important political philosophies in human history — democracy and communism — emerged almost a century apart, yet have been compared constantly ever since. The seemingly contrasting principles of the two were further reinforced by the emergence of the Modernist Project, in which proponents of democracy such as the United States and Britain pitted their political ideology against communism, effectively waging a Cold War against the Soviet Union and China. The eventual fall of communism in Eastern Europe appeared to confirm that democracy remains unchallenged as a political ideology — or, in the words of political theorist Francis Fukuyama, that democracy is the "end of history" of humankind (Fukuyama, 2006).
Is democracy indeed the "end of history" — the only legitimate form of political ideology that has existed in human history? Does this mean that only institutions subscribing to the democratic ideal have the right to rule? Looking at how democracy and communism have been implemented, and how they have led to the rise and fall of regimes throughout the world, it may seem that a democratic form of government is the only one with the right to rule. However, an analysis of the works of James Madison and Karl Marx demonstrates that both thinkers used democracy as the foundation of their political thought. Because democracy underlies both Madison's and Marx's ideas, the political ideologies they promoted are each legitimate in their own right. The sections that follow explore both thinkers' concepts of democracy — as it relates to democratic governance and to communism.
James Madison's political ideology is best reflected in The Federalist No. 10, entitled "The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection" (1787). Writing from the perspective of someone about to become one of the Framers of the Constitution, Madison expounded on a political ideal founded on the individual and the majority. At its core, democracy is based on the idea of liberty — the liberty of each individual member of civil society — and Madison considered it "essential to political life."
In Federalist No. 10, Madison also acknowledges the paradox that democracy presents. Under democracy, people exhibit "diversity in the faculties of men" while simultaneously sharing a "uniformity of interests." Democracy is found in the tension between these two contrasting realities: it seeks to unite diverse individuals and strengthen their common interest in preserving liberty without causing grave harm to social order. In a democratic form of government, diverse ideas are unified under the shared goal of attaining and preserving human freedom. Yet each individual does not surrender his or her "faculties." Madison resolves this tension through the concept of representativeness:
"[E]xtend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of the citizens… where there is a consciousness of unjust or dishonorable purposes, communication is always checked by distrust in proportion to the number whose concurrence is necessary."
Rosen (1996) reaffirmed Madison's ideas on liberty, representativeness, and democracy. In his analysis of Madison's essays in The Federalist, Rosen concluded that Madison's ideas on democracy function primarily as a "theoretical standard," and that, although theoretical in nature, they "define the political task, describing its contours with genuine precision" (p. 568). Centuries later, Madison's ideas have remained relevant, demonstrated through the United States as an example of democracy working in practice — and possibly as the only form of government capable of thriving in the modern era.
"Marx's critique of class antagonism and communist vision"
"Shared basis of freedom in both ideologies"
Madison, J. E-text of The Federalist No. 10. Retrieved from http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa10.htm
Marx, K., & Engels, F. E-text of The Communist Manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm
Mostov, J. (1989). Karl Marx as democratic theorist. Polity, 22(2).
Rosen, G. (1996). James Madison and the problem of founding. The Review of Politics, 58(3).
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.