This paper examines mental retardation in relation to the development of learning programs for children with intellectual disabilities. It reviews the diagnostic criteria established by the American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR), outlines the four severity classifications β mild, moderate, severe, and profound β and describes the corresponding IQ ranges and adaptive skill limitations for each. The paper also identifies the educational and vocational outcomes typically associated with each category and emphasizes the importance of designing appropriate developmental programs that support the greatest possible independent functioning in mainstream society.
Developmental learning programs are based on a child's cognitive abilities and IQ range. According to the American Association on Mental Retardation (AAMR), an individual is considered to have mental retardation when the following three criteria are met: intellectual functioning level (IQ) is below 70β75; significant limitations exist in two or more adaptive skill areas; and the condition is present from childhood, defined as age 18 or younger (AAMR, 1992).
When considering the development of learning programs for the disabled, the relevant terminology links a child's IQ to their ability to learn basic skills. It is therefore incumbent upon those creating developmental programs to be aware of these limitations. The major challenge is to identify and develop appropriate programs and activities that are essential to functional development.
Individuals with intellectual disabilities tend to learn at a slower rate, have difficulty combining skills, and struggle to maintain skills and knowledge over time. The four recognized severity levels, each defined by an IQ range, are as follows:
Mild: IQ range of approximately 52β68. Moderate: IQ range of approximately 35β40 to 50β55. Severe: IQ range of approximately 20β25 to 35β40. Profound: IQ below approximately 20β25.
"Skills, limitations, and outcomes per severity level"
"Independent mainstream functioning as overarching goal"
You’re 33% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.