This paper draws connections between Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophical framework in On the Genealogy of Morals and characterizations in The Book of J, edited by Harold Bloom and translated by David Rosenberg. The analysis examines how Jacob embodies Nietzsche's concept of master morality—the notion that power and capability determine moral defensibility—while Moses exemplifies slave morality, wherein the powerless create moral systems (such as Christian values) to counter the dominance of the powerful. Through textual comparison, the paper demonstrates how these biblical figures illustrate Nietzsche's distinction between morality based on power (good/bad) versus morality based on powerlessness (good/evil).
Virtually anyone even remotely acquainted with Friedrich Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morals is able to draw parallels between the German philosopher's musings and certain characters found within The Book of J, which reflects the authorship and translation of Harold Bloom and David Rosenberg, respectively. Specifically, one can see the correlation between what Nietzsche refers to as master morality and the character Jacob, and what the philosopher refers to as slave morality and the characterization of Moses in the latter work.
To understand how Jacob relates to Nietzsche's master morality concepts, one must first grasp them and one of the fundamental conceptions in Nietzsche's book. In tracing the genealogy of morals, Nietzsche determines that there is a marked difference between the tenets of good and bad versus those of good and evil. The former dichotomy is based on power and a mentality in which might is responsible for rendering what is morally defensible. Nietzsche poses the notion that in ancient times, whatever those with power—both socially, financially, and physically—did was deemed right and morally defensible.
Jacob epitomizes this perception in Rosenberg's work because he does whatever he is capable of to win the blessing of Yahweh. Much of his behavior to do so—which includes clawing at his older brother Esau's heels when they are born in an attempt to deny Esau his firstborn right of the blessing, outwitting Esau, and even wrestling with angels to secure the blessing—seems outright devious if not incorrigible. Yet because he had the wiles and the physical capacity to engage in such actions and actually secure the blessing, it is morally correct. The lineage of God's people are traced through him, and not his brother. These expressions of intellectual and physical power determining what is moral are referenced by Nietzsche as his master morality conception.
The slave morality tenet of Nietzsche is well aligned with the character of Moses in The Book of J. A brief explanation of this idea helps demonstrate how Moses typifies it. Slave morality is based on the conception of good and evil, which Nietzsche believes is distinct from good and bad. Whatever the rich nobles did was good; those who did not have the means to do what those nobles did were deemed bad. This latter group of people, lacking in power as defined by social, economic, and physical spheres of life, originated the notion of good and evil, where good was aligned with the church and Christian values—since that was the only power that powerless people could have. Evil was deemed by these people as those actions and values that were not aligned with the church's values.
Moses was quite unlike Jacob in that he did not take action into his own hands and instead depended on Yahweh (the best emblem of the church and its morals) for everything. The fact that Moses was relatively powerless is evinced in a number of different ways, including the fact that he was frequently led astray and lost in the wilderness, nearly killed by Yahweh, and prevented from seeing the promised land. Yet through all these travails, Moses remained humble, powerless, and utterly dependent on God the way that virtually any poor, social pariah might as well.
"Jacob and Moses represent inverse moral frameworks"
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.