This paper addresses two foundational questions in nonprofit governance. The first examines why nonprofit boards and their stakeholders often experience confusion about board authority, identifying ambiguity in defined roles, liability clarity, and overlap with executive leadership as central causes. The second explores the key roles board members assume in the strategic planning process, with particular attention to funding portfolio management, revenue generation, and volunteer mobilization. Drawing on Worth (2018), Kearns et al. (2014), and Elsey (2019), the paper proposes concrete steps — including formal oversight policies, regular stakeholder communication, and periodic audits — to strengthen board effectiveness and organizational sustainability.
Effective nonprofit governance depends on a clear understanding of board authority and the active involvement of board members in strategic planning. Two questions frame this discussion: why do nonprofit boards and those who interact with them often become confused about board authority, and what key roles do board members play in the strategic planning process?
According to Worth (2018), in most cases the roles, duties, and responsibilities of nonprofit boards are not clearly or explicitly defined. The author notes that there is little consensus about the precise scope of board authority. Compounding this problem, there is often insufficient clarity about the legal liability of board members and the protections afforded to them. In other scenarios, the formally defined roles of the board may overlap with those of the CEO and other managerial officers of the organization, creating further ambiguity about who holds ultimate decision-making authority on key matters.
There are several strategies that nonprofit boards should embrace to strengthen their oversight function. First, the roles and responsibilities of the board should be clearly defined — especially with regard to its oversight duties — so that both board members and executive staff understand the boundaries of each party's authority. Second, Worth (2018) recommends that boards ensure communication with relevant stakeholders is effective and regular, since meaningful oversight requires ongoing engagement between the board and other officers of the organization.
Third, there is value in developing a formal oversight policy that sets a clear oversight agenda benchmarked against sector best practices. Fourth, periodic audits — conducted on a quarterly or annual basis — provide a structured mechanism for accountability and help the board identify gaps before they become significant organizational risks.
One of the key roles assumed by board members is the design and management of the nonprofit's funding portfolio (Kearns, Bell, Deem, & McShane, 2014). The authors describe this as a particularly instrumental strategic role given the need to adapt to "changing circumstances and anticipated economic conditions" (p. 122). Board members also bear responsibility for actively participating in fundraising revenue generation and volunteer mobilization.
As funding shortfalls resulting from economic downturns have made resource mobilization a shared organizational concern rather than the exclusive domain of specific staff, board members are expected to contribute beyond their formal governance duties. Elsey (2019) argues that board members should go further by reaching out to their personal networks and, where possible, contributing personal resources to support the organization's mission. This expanded role positions the board not merely as a governance body but as an active partner in ensuring the nonprofit remains relevant and capable of fulfilling its mandate over time. Understanding how boards contribute to strategic resource development is essential to appreciating the full scope of board leadership.
Effective nonprofit governance depends on clearly defined authority structures and board members who actively participate in strategic priorities. Addressing confusion about board roles — through explicit role definitions, regular stakeholder communication, formal oversight policies, and periodic audits — creates the conditions for sound board performance. Equally, recognizing the board's contribution to funding strategy and resource mobilization reinforces its value as both a governance and a strategic asset. Together, these dimensions are essential foundations for long-term nonprofit sustainability.
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.