This essay examines Henrik Ibsen's portrayal of Nora Helmer's struggle for authentic identity in A Doll's House, set against the backdrop of nineteenth-century naturalism and rigid gender conventions. Through close analysis of Nora's character development and her relationship with her husband Torvald, the paper demonstrates how Ibsen uses the "doll" metaphor to represent the inauthentic identity imposed on women by male-dominated society. The essay traces Nora's gradual awakening to her oppression, catalyzed by Torvald's response to her unlawful loan, and concludes with her ultimate rejection of both her doll-like role and her family obligations in favor of personal self-education and independence. The work explores themes of duty, manipulation, and the conflict between societal responsibility and individual autonomy.
Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House takes place during the literary movement of Naturalism, which customarily reflected the society of that time. The society of this era was exclusively male-dominated, with women's actions and rights assessed from a male standpoint. In the play, Ibsen fully acknowledges the reality of the nineteenth-century woman's role as a stay-at-home mother whose life focused on raising children and attending to her husband's every need. He is able to convey the struggle that women of this time faced in order to find their authentic identity in the face of dictatorial social conventions. Through his characters Nora Helmer and Torvald Helmer, Ibsen brings to life the reality of a woman's divide between a sense of duty to themselves and their responsibility to others, while attacking women's rights as a matter of importance. Nora's dynamic character, initially oppressed by her husband, presents an inauthentic identity to the audience that eventually reveals the truth of her existence and decides to go against the norm of her society to discover her authentic identity.
In Ibsen's play, Nora is the dynamic character. Throughout the entirety of the play, the audience witnesses the evolution of Nora's identity. They witness her identity transform from one that is inauthentic to one that is authentic. At the beginning of the play, the audience sees her as a woman being oppressed by her husband, one with an inauthentic identity. Nora is seen in this inauthentic way due to the relationship she had with her husband. The relationship with her husband skewed Nora's identity through both spoon-feeding and pampering.
As one scholar notes, "She has been made to believe that she was happy, that she was an ideal wife, and that her husband loves her, and she was living with the belief that an ideal husband like hers would, if the necessity arose, sacrifice his life to save her reputation" (Goonetilleke). She is the perfect image of a doll wife who revels in the thoughts of the luxuries that she can afford because she is married. When Nora speaks to Torvald about their financial situation, she says, "Oh yes, Torvald, we can squander a little now. Can't we? Just a tiny, wee bit. Now that you've got a big salary and are going to make piles and piles of money" (Ibsen, Act I). Nora is seen as very flirtatious. She constantly engages in childlike acts of disobedience, such as telling white lies about whether she bought macaroons. Nora goes through life with the illusion that everything is perfect.
Nora's role as a subordinate to her husband, Torvald, is extremely important to her character. Throughout the play, the audience is presented with how Nora is oppressed by the social conventions of the middle class, which is characterized by being "preoccupied with work and money, leading to a reduction of values from a moral to a material plane" (Goonetilleke). Ibsen depicts the character of Nora as a subordinate in order to emphasize the role of women in society at that time. Though Torvald accuses Nora of being irresponsible with money, stating "You're never at a loss for scaring up money; but the moment you have it, it runs right out through your fingers; you never know what you've done with it" (Ibsen, Act I), he gives her more money in order to watch her happy reaction. In this example and many others, the audience can see how Torvald's means of manipulation oppresses Nora, figuratively making her his doll. She upholds the role of the nineteenth-century woman by maintaining the image of a homemaker, decorating and caregiving, ensuring that she pleases her husband by being a dependent figure with whose emotions he can toy.
Ibsen uses Torvald as an image of how nineteenth-century men oppressed women and what their typical relationship with society looked like. The audience is made aware from the very beginning that he has recently acquired a promotion to bank manager, and with this promotion arrives many responsibilities. Throughout the play, Nora is seen as one of these responsibilities. Torvald is very authoritative and puts his appearance, both social and physical, ahead of his wife, whom he supposedly loves. He is seen as a man worried about his reputation and careless of his wife's feelings.
As a scholar explains, "Torvald Helmer upholds these values because it is in his interest to do so. He knows that his dominant quality, self-interest, will be protected by his adherence to conventional morality. He imposes it on his wife, Nora, because it satisfies his vanity and makes her subservient to him. To him the man is the superior being, holding the economic reins and thereby concentrating in his hands all power and responsibility in the household, making the woman his slave" (Goonetilleke). To the peers of the outside world of their society, Nora and Torvald's relationship appears to be one of happiness. However, Nora appears to the audience as childish and doll-like. Torvald addresses her throughout as though she is a small creature: "my little lark," "my little squirrel," "my little spendthrift," "little featherhead," "my sweet little skylark," "Miss Sweet Tooth," "my little songbird," "my precious little singing bird," "my capricious little Capri maiden," and "little featherbrain" (Forward).
Torvald calls Nora by these pet-names and speaks down to her because he believes that she lacks intelligence and cannot think on her own. He also believes that her only role is that of a subservient and loving wife. To him, she is only a possession. Whenever she begins to voice an opinion, he quickly drops the pet-names and insults her through comments like "Nora, Nora, just like a woman" (Ibsen, Act I) and "worries that you couldn't possibly help me with" (Ibsen, Act III). Ibsen creates Torvald as a character who portrays a typical nineteenth-century husband. He denies Nora the right to think and act as she wishes and requires her to act like an imbecile, insistent upon the rightness of his views in all matters. But as the play progresses, Nora begins to realize how fake her marriage truly is and begins to question the happiness that the outside world of her society views.
The world of the nineteenth-century woman revolved around her family, which caused her to sacrifice herself for them. Her main purpose in life was to be happy for her husband and children. In the beginning, Nora believed that she loved Torvald and was happy. She had a passionate and devoted heart that was willing to do almost anything for her husband. The audience sees this passion in action when they discover the unlawful loan that she had taken out to save her husband's life.
Before Torvald learns of the unlawful loan, Nora does not understand that her feelings are not reciprocated. Just as almost any man of this time, Torvald does not want a wife who will challenge him with her own thoughts and actions. The final confrontation between the couple involves more oppression by Torvald, but by this time Nora has realized the situation he wishes to maintain. Torvald calls her a "featherbrained woman" (Ibsen, Act III) and "blind, incompetent child" (Ibsen, Act III), even though the unlawful act that she undertook was one that saved his life. Nora expects Torvald to be grateful to her for her act of love but finds that this is not the case. When Torvald says, "Now you have wrecked all my happiness—ruined my future" (Ibsen, Act III) and "I'm saved!" (Ibsen, Act III), Torvald exhibits his self-absorbed nature. The fury Nora sees after Torvald opens the letter shows her a strange man, someone she has not been a true wife to, someone she does not love but someone with whom she built a marriage based on falseness that was only mutually beneficial because of their social status.
As one scholar notes, "She realizes that he is not the man she thought he was, and that their life together has been inauthentic. She is supposed to be his little skylark, not an independent human being. She has not been happy, she says, just merry" (Markussen). Nora says, "Yes. I am beginning to understand everything now" (Ibsen, Act III). It is at this point that she begins to comprehend that her forgery was wrong, not because it was illegal, but because it was for an unworthy cause. This is when the readers see Nora fully embark on her transformation toward an authentic identity and decide that the only way to fix the situation is to leave Torvald and her children and find her independence.
The audience begins to see the process of Nora's authentic identity being built when she speaks of how she is the one that saved her husband's life through an unlawful act. She takes pride in herself for the unlawful act but still continues to live her life pretending to be the old Nora, unknowingly hiding the changed woman she has become. Slowly, Nora's character is forced to discontinue her inauthentic role as a doll in order to seek out her individuality. She finds within herself that she can make her own decisions and does not have to follow the rules set by the men of her society. This sudden realization of independence is brought on full force when Torvald's negative reaction to her unlawful act surfaces. Nora is in full realization of her new authentic identity and comes to understand that her whole life has been molded by the men in her life and that she has ultimately been living a lie.
A scholar observes that "After Torvald has read Krogstad's letter he accuses Nora of being like her father, having 'No religion, no morality, no sense of duty,' but she ultimately comes to see herself as an object molded by her father and then by her husband" (Forward). She realizes that her responsibilities to herself are more important than those to her husband and children. Nora slams the door on not just Torvald but on everything that happened in her past. It takes her some time to evolve into this new person, but after she does, she becomes a person who will not stand to be oppressed by Torvald any longer.
Once Nora finds her authentic identity and realizes how much like a doll she has been, she states, "I've been your wife-doll here, just as at home I was Papa's doll-child" (Ibsen, Act III). Ibsen uses the idea of a "doll" in comparison to Nora because a doll always maintains the same appearance, no matter what the situation. A doll must do whatever the controller has them do. Dolls are silent, never expressing opinions or accomplishing anything without the aid of others. This doll is Nora's inauthentic identity. Nora tells Torvald at the end of the play that, "I have to try to educate myself. You can't help me with that. I've got to do it alone. And that's why I'm leaving you now" (Ibsen, Act III). This is when she realizes that it is now time to be her authentic self and states to Torvald, "I'm a human being, no less than you—or anyway, I ought to try to become one" (Ibsen, Act III). One source notes that "Torvald is shocked that she will neglect her 'most sacred duties'—to her husband and children—but Nora points out that she has other duties that are just as sacred: 'Duties to myself'" (Forward). She does not tolerate Torvald's condescending tone and does not allow him to manipulate her any longer. Nora follows her convictions now and decides for herself what her life will be in the future. Her rebirth has led to her independence. No other man will ever again control her, and she is now free of her controlling husband.
In A Doll's House, Ibsen conveys the struggles of women in the nineteenth century through Nora Helmer's character. Nora is forced to confront the limitations that were present in the nineteenth-century so that she is able to find her authentic identity in the face of dictatorial social convention. Ibsen's ability to address this conflict brings to the surface the divide between a sense of duty to oneself and one's responsibility to others. The inauthentic identity that Nora possesses is one that is established by her husband, Torvald. Throughout the play, Torvald is condescending toward Nora, forcing her to act and look in a way that pleased him. No matter what the situation, Nora consistently adheres to Torvald's wants; she must be his quiet, happy, little doll. Through her husband's adherence to conventional morality, Nora comes to find her authentic self, resulting in the end of her life as a doll. In the end, she leaves her doll house so that she can educate herself and explore the world that is unknown to her. She is no longer a doll under the control of her master. She now has the right to pursue her destiny, to be first and foremost a human being.
You’re 94% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.