This paper examines nurse-to-patient staffing ratios in Illinois, focusing on the Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Law enacted in 2007. It traces the legislative history from California's pioneering minimum-ratio mandate through Illinois's alternative committee-driven approach. Drawing on peer-reviewed research, the paper presents empirical evidence linking lower patient loads to improved thirty-day mortality rates, reduced infection rates, and decreased nurse burnout. It also outlines the ongoing controversy between hospital associations concerned about costs and the American Nurses Association, which argues that adequate staffing ultimately reduces medical expenditures and improves care quality across the healthcare system.
For many years, the ongoing nursing shortage has required nurses to work longer hours and care for more patients, causing many of them to make fatal and near-fatal mistakes that could otherwise have been avoided. Illinois attempted to remedy this situation by enacting the Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Law on August 24, 2007 ("The Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Law," 2012). Rather than setting fixed numbers for specific nurse-to-patient ratios, the law instead requires hospitals to enact staffing plans recommended by a committee of their nurses, comprised of at least 50% direct-care staff nurses. The plans created by these committees must be reevaluated semi-annually so that their effectiveness can be gauged.
The nurses on staff are responsible for continually monitoring the plans that have been put in place to ensure that patient needs are properly met. This approach differs from standard ratio laws, which mandate a fixed number of nurses per patient regardless of circumstances ("The Nurse Staffing by Patient Acuity Law," 2012).
Due to financial concerns, many hospitals resist adding extra nurses to fully staff their floors, making it imperative that legislators step in to require such action. The first state to successfully implement nurse-to-patient ratio staffing was California, which mandated that minimum nurse-to-patient ratios be maintained at all times ("Nursing Staff Plans and Ratios," 2011). This law was enacted in 2004, and since then many other states have followed suit with laws of their own, though California remains the only state to have enacted minimum nurse staffing requirements (Aiken et al., 2010, p. 904).
While the need for some oversight of nursing coverage was broadly recognized, many states felt that the California legislation was needlessly heavy-handed in excluding nurses and other medical staff from the decision-making process. Illinois believed there was a better way to implement such a plan while still achieving the sought-after effects of California's bill. This belief was reflected in the passage of the Patient Acuity Law, which incorporated input from the medical profession — including the affected nurses — when creating a plan for nursing coverage. This law has been in effect since its passage in 2007.
Studies have repeatedly found that nursing shortages directly impact patient survival and infection rates, while nurse fatigue correlates with a higher incidence of self-reported errors (Stone et al., 2007, p. 571). In particular, when patient loads are lower, there is a significant statistical improvement in thirty-day mortality and infection rates (Stone et al., 2007, p. 575). Since California's nurse-to-patient ratio law was implemented, studies found that hospital nurses in that state cared for, on average, one fewer patient than nurses in other states, while medical and surgical nurses cared for two fewer patients than their counterparts elsewhere (Aiken et al., 2010, p. 904). These findings provide strong empirical evidence that limiting the number of patients per nurse benefits both medical staff and patients.
When other states have voluntarily limited nurses' workloads to California levels, nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction were lower, and nurses reported consistently better quality of care overall (Aiken et al., 2010, p. 904). In general, nurses have overwhelmingly reacted to these ratios positively, embracing them as a way to improve patient care and increase nurse retention in areas that are historically difficult to staff. The American Nurses Association has stated that "the appropriate number and mix of nursing staff is critical to the delivery of quality patient care" ("Nurse Staffing Plans & Ratios," 2011). Because of that position, the association strongly supports state-mandated staffing requirements and nurse-to-patient ratios, especially given continuing cuts to hospital nursing budgets across the country.
"Cost concerns versus ANA's quality-of-care arguments"
Nurse-to-patient ratios may ultimately be the only way to effectively manage the nursing workload. Hospitals, which are constantly seeking ways to increase their bottom lines, will continue to mandate longer working hours and fewer staff because it is cost-efficient. While it cannot be denied that some hospitals have been forced to cut back or even close following the enactment of such legislation, this is most likely a short-term adjustment until the nursing shortage can be stabilized. The only way that goal will be accomplished is through legislation ensuring that every nurse can give adequate attention and care to each patient assigned to them. This will benefit everyone who utilizes the nation's healthcare system — both physically and financially — in the long run.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.