This paper presents a concept analysis of caring as a foundational element of nursing theory and practice. Drawing on the work of Patricia Benner, Madeleine Leininger, and Jean Watson, the paper examines how caring is defined, categorized, and operationalized across different dimensions of nursing. It explores how caring is cultivated through professional development and mentoring, institutionalized through organizational models such as the Carolina Care Model and Swanson's Caring Theory, and fostered through appreciative leadership programs. The paper argues that a culture of caring benefits not only nurse-patient relationships but also organizational outcomes, nurse job satisfaction, and overall patient experience.
This paper effectively uses concept analysis to bridge theory and practice. Rather than treating caring as self-evident, it unpacks the concept through multiple theoretical lenses and then traces how each framework is operationalized in real institutional settings, demonstrating how abstract nursing philosophy translates into standardized, replicable behaviors on the clinical floor.
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction defining caring and situating it within nursing history. A section on theoretical foundations covers Watson, Leininger, and Benner. Three parallel body sections then examine caring across three resource arenas—professional development, organizational structure, and leadership—mirroring the framework proposed by Skillings (2008). The conclusion synthesizes findings and uses outcome data from the Carolina Care Model to validate the paper's central argument.
Caring is a concept central to nursing theory. An esteemed constellation of nurses throughout history — including Nightingale, Watson, Henderson, and Benner — have integrated the concept of care into their theory and practice. Caring has been considered a foundational element of nursing such that "compassion and therapeutic relationships" are viewed as essential "underpinnings" of nursing (Skillings, 2008). As with most disciplines, the complexities that accompany professional practice in contemporary settings can pose unanticipated challenges. The ethic of caring that is fundamental to nursing endures an onslaught of competing priorities, barriers to compassionate practice, and adaptations inherent to modern healthcare institutions (Skillings, 2008).
Most behaviors that the nursing discipline considers caring are readily recognized, such as "attentive listening, comforting, honesty, patience, responsibility, providing information so the patient can make an informed decision, touch, sensitivity, respect, and calling the patient by name" (Vance, 2003). Categorically, many nurse practitioners and nurse educators place these behaviors under several headings. For instance, Swanson's caring theory processes are Knowing, Being With, Doing For, and Enabling (Tonges & Ray, 2011). The Swanson Caring Theory framework for patient well-being considers Enabling and Doing For as behaviors indicating professional competence, while Knowing and Being With are considered manifestations of compassion — and are directed toward Maintaining Belief in the patient (Tonges & Ray, 2011).
One purpose of this discussion is to explore how resource use impacts the articulation of caring in nursing practice. Skillings (2008) asserts that the following arenas have the potential to impact a caring footprint in nursing practice: 1) training, mentoring, and professional development; 2) organizational aspects, such as cultural transformation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and organizational infrastructure; and 3) nursing leadership across all levels of a healthcare institution.
Three theories and models of caring that developed in the 1970s continue to influence the curriculum in preparation programs for professional nursing practice: Patricia Benner's novice-to-expert model, Madeleine Leininger's theory of cultural care, and Jean Watson's theory of human caring (Leininger, 1991; Watson, 1988).
Watson viewed caring as a science that enfolds caring processes, experiences, and phenomena into a holistic practice characterized by a humanistic orientation. With a worldview of connectedness and unity, Watson located her theory in relational ontology. That is, she perceived the being-in-relation orientation as "concentric circles of caring" with interactive capacity — think of ripples in a pond — capable of impacting others and the environment through caring behavior (Watson, 1996).
Leininger's transcultural theory is sometimes referred to as culture care theory, since effective and considerate patient care is central to Leininger's conceptualization. Leininger believed that knowledge of patients' cultures equipped nurses to strengthen their commitment to providing care grounded in the nurse-patient relationship (Leininger, 1991). Through a greater understanding of the influence of cultural beliefs and practices, nurses are inclined to view their patients more holistically rather than focusing only on a set of symptoms or the manifestation of a patient's illness (Leininger, 1991). A foundation in transcultural understanding fosters the ability of nurses to see how their patients' culture and faith help them deal with sickness, suffering, and even death (Leininger, 1991). Through a perspective informed by cultural knowledge, non-traditional treatments — meditation, anointing, and other spiritual therapies — can be more easily appreciated and integrated into diverse approaches to caring (Leininger, 1991).
If nurses are to accept the aphorism that "caring is a practice," then resources allocated to the practice of nursing can provide opportunities to strengthen and integrate caring as a substantive element of nursing in contemporary contexts (Skillings, 2008). Leininger's transcultural nursing framework remains one of the most influential contributions to this understanding, connecting cultural competence directly to the quality of caring relationships.
Benner developed a model of caring that incorporates the acquisition of nursing skills from "novice to expert" and that fits well with professional preparation programs, but is especially relevant to in-service staff training (Fry, 1983). Benner's model is broad-sweeping, including advocacy, healing power, integrative caring, participative and affirmative power, problem solving, and transformative power (Fry, 1983). Benner's model helped to establish an ethos within the nursing profession that values patients as whole human beings, inclusive of their physical, psychosocial, and spiritual needs (Fry, 1984).
Implicit in Benner's model is the idea that the skills needed for nursing can be learned through experience and through instruction or mentoring (Fry, 1993). Benner's model communicates a vision of nursing as relational, involving "the nurse's response as a human being, first, and then secondarily, in the nursing role" (Benner, 1984; Fry, 1993). The relational dynamics between a nursing student and a nurse educator — or between a practicing nurse and an in-service trainer — exemplify caring as an evolving and interpersonal process (Fry, 1993). Instructors must demonstrate caring to learners as an example of how nurses should interact with their patients, as a means to enhance communication, as an avenue to more productive mentoring, and as a support to the development of emotional intelligence (Fry, 1993; Skillings, 2008).
The concept of caring in nursing practice has grown beyond the original limits that located caring at the nexus of the nurse-patient relationship. While this dynamic remains a core competency of nursing, the field has also embraced the caring relationship that exists between nurses and their employers, trainers, educators, and mentors. Indeed, caring in nursing is seen as an important aspect of peer relationships among nurses as well. The important phenomena to consider in any discussion of caring are the overall impacts on patient care, patient satisfaction, professional performance and competence, and job satisfaction for nurses.
Caring in nursing practice — and organizational cultures that support caring as an institutional given — results in ancillary benefits beyond what is initially conceived. The findings from implementation of the Carolina Care Model serve as a compelling summary: patients indicated more satisfaction with regard to concern for privacy, meeting emotional needs, and attention to special and personal needs; "the most marked improvements were seen in the areas of pain control and response to call lights" (Tonges & Ray, 2011). These outcomes affirm that cultivating caring across professional development, organizational structures, and leadership is not merely an ethical imperative, but a practical strategy for improving the quality of healthcare.
Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Dewar, B., & Cook, G. (2013). Developing compassion through a relationship centered appreciative leadership programme. Nurse Education Today, 14(9), 1258–1264.
Fry, N. A. (1993). Beyond professional caring: Teaching nursing students the art of Christian caring. Paper delivered at the Faith and Learning Seminar at Union College, Lincoln, Nebraska, June 1993. Retrieved from http://ict.aiias.edu/vol_10/10cc_167-185.htm
Leininger, M. M. (1991). Culture care, diversity and universality: A theory of nursing. New York, NY: National League of Nursing Press.
Skillings, L. N. (2008). Guest editorial: Leadership in caring. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 6–7.
Tonges, M., & Ray, J. (2011). Translating caring theory into practice: The Carolina Care Model. Retrieved from
Vance, T. (2003). Caring and the professional practice of nursing. Journal of Nursing. Retrieved from http://rnjournal.com/journal-of-nursing/caring-and-the-professional-practice-of-nursing
Watson, J. (1988). New dimensions of human caring theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1(4), 175–181.
Watson, J. (1996). Watson's theory of transpersonal caring. In P. H. Walker & B. Nueman (Eds.), Blueprint for use of nursing models: Education, research, practice, and administration (pp. 141–184). New York, NY: NLN Press.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.