This paper examines the ongoing nursing staffing shortage in the United States, drawing on research by Fox and Abrahamson, Clarke, and Flynn and McKeown. It explores how inadequate staffing levels correlate with adverse patient outcomes and discusses the "work smarter" approach to optimizing skill mix and staffing ratios. The paper also addresses the structural factors driving nurse attrition — including demanding working conditions, compensation stagnation, and educational pipeline gaps — and evaluates proposed solutions such as labor-saving technology, quality-based reimbursement, male recruitment into nursing, and improved continuing education for inactive nurses.
One of the greatest challenges to the continued development of a high-quality healthcare delivery system is the persistent and frequently worsening shortage of qualified nurses active in the profession. The nursing shortage has waxed and waned for decades but currently appears to be in a state of constant deficit (Fox & Abrahamson, 2009, pp. 235–236). Research associating low staffing levels with increased adverse patient outcomes has also grown, stating rather starkly that staffing shortages increase the likelihood of poor patient outcomes — an effect that is more pronounced in some settings than others and also dependent on skill mix (Clarke, 2008, p. 8). The consensus has been, and will likely remain, that the system must learn to utilize existing practicing nurses more efficiently by adjusting policy and practice to the situation at hand. Given that the nursing shortage appears to be enduring, the entire system must work smarter to maintain high standards of patient care (Clarke, 2008, p. 8).
Flynn and McKeown note that some experts — especially on the administrative staffing side — emphasize research and practice changes that develop smart staffing and skill mix systems. These systems determine who needs to be where and when, based on a large number of patient census and demographic variables, including patient acuity and need levels derived from statistical models, research findings, and collective algorithms (2009, pp. 759–760). The emphasis has been on working more efficiently and in an evidence-based manner: using research to determine the best possible minimal and optimal staff and skill mix for any given situation.
Yet the same researchers are also quick to point out that no system is perfect, and that staffing miscalculations are still possible and can still result in lowered patient outcomes (Flynn & McKeown, 2009, pp. 760–761). This is further supported by Clarke, who contends that even skill mix and staffing ratio research demonstrates that poor patient outcomes can occur even when optimal conditions are achieved, and that more must be done to promote genuinely smart work practices (2008, pp. 8–9).
The problem with the "work smarter" theory is that it often carries with it a "work harder" mentality that falls almost entirely on the nurses themselves. Nurses simultaneously face a shortage of qualified colleagues, higher technology demands, longer working hours due to shift work, increased physical demands, higher levels of liability, and a flattening compensation scale. As Fox and Abrahamson observe, these real and perceived challenges — coupled with the availability of other more lucrative and less demanding career options for young people, especially women — will likely continue to exacerbate the shortage (2009, pp. 235–240).
The research on nurse-to-patient ratios underscores this tension: even well-designed staffing models place the burden of managing high patient loads on individual nurses, without fully resolving the underlying structural deficits that drive burnout and attrition.
Fox and Abrahamson also point out that the system seeks to address the shortage by increasing the number of new qualified nurses through an educational pipeline that is itself lacking sufficient advanced-degree nurses to teach the next generation (2009, p. 237). However, they note that the multivariate pressures facing working nurses add to, rather than detract from, high nurse attrition rates (2009, p. 237). This point is supported by Flynn and McKeown, who stress the importance of improving the working environment for nurses as a response to these compounding variables (2009, pp. 763–764).
"Why nurses leave and educator supply gaps"
"Evidence-based remedies and policy recommendations"
There are clearly many possible answers to the problems facing the medical field due to nursing shortages, but as has been pointed out by many, the number of licensed registered nurses already trained in the U.S. has the potential to meet all of its nursing needs. What is required is a collective effort to address the growing demand through smarter policy, better working conditions, and more strategic use of the existing workforce (Fox & Abrahamson, 2009, pp. 237–238).
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.