Occupational Fraud Prevention in Small Business Accounting
This paper reviews key themes from Nilsen's (2010) article "Keeping Fraud in the Cross Hairs," published in the Journal of Accountancy. Drawing on findings from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, the paper examines the prevalence of occupational fraud, the role of the fraud triangle — particularly opportunity — in enabling fraudulent behavior, and why accounting departments are especially vulnerable. It discusses asset misappropriations and billing schemes as common fraud types, and outlines preventive measures including employee education, anonymous reporting hotlines, enhanced vendor controls, and emerging software technologies such as textual analytics. The paper emphasizes that fraud prevention is most effective when employers and employees collaborate.
- Introduction: The Scope of Occupational Fraud: ACFE data establishes fraud's broad financial impact
- Small Businesses and Fraud Vulnerability: Small firms face greater occupational fraud exposure
- The Fraud Triangle and Accounting Department Risk: Opportunity and insider knowledge enable accounting fraud
- Asset Misappropriations and Billing Schemes: Cash theft and fake vendors dominate fraud types
- Fraud Prevention Strategies: Education, hotlines, and software deter fraud
- Conclusion: Collaboration and technology strengthen fraud prevention
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its claims in a specific, cited source and uses statistics (e.g., 80% of asset misappropriations are cash-related, 85% of firms earn under $5 million) to support its analysis.
- It moves logically from defining the problem, to identifying causes, to proposing solutions — a clear problem-solution structure that aids reader comprehension.
- The paper offers brief critical commentary on the source article (e.g., noting that the fraud triangle's other two elements are not fully explained), demonstrating evaluative rather than purely descriptive engagement.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates source-based critical analysis: the writer does not simply summarize Nilsen (2010) but evaluates its strengths and gaps, such as pointing out that the article fails to define all three elements of the fraud triangle or explain the specific controls in the accounting department. This evaluative stance distinguishes a strong review from a basic summary.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the broad scope of occupational fraud using ACFE data, narrows to the specific vulnerability of small businesses, then examines the fraud triangle and accounting department risk. It proceeds through types of fraud (asset misappropriation, billing schemes) before concluding with practical prevention strategies. Each section builds on the previous, maintaining a focused analytical thread throughout.
Introduction: The Scope of Occupational Fraud
Fraud continues to pervade the accounting industry. A study conducted by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2010) found that fraud — in terms of losses, schemes, detection methods, and perpetrators of occupational fraud — was broadly consistent across six studies. With the inclusion of international data, the study also found that fraud problems plagued non-U.S. companies as well. It is estimated that five percent of annual income is lost to fraud. Nilsen's (2010) article "Keeping Fraud in the Cross Hairs" briefly examines the causes of fraud and the steps that may be implemented to prevent it.
Small Businesses and Fraud Vulnerability
Although large financial frauds have garnered the most attention in the media, these cases comprise only 15% of U.S. financial companies. The remaining 85% of companies generate less than $5 million in revenue and are the most vulnerable to occupational fraud. The majority of CPAs are not auditing multi-million dollar companies and are therefore more likely to detect fraudulent schemes within small businesses.
Reference
Nilsen, K. (2010). Keeping fraud in the cross hairs. Journal of Accountancy, 209(6), 20–25.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.