Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,465 words

George Orwell and John Wyndham: Class, Hypocrisy, Society

~8 min read
Abstract

This paper examines how George Orwell's A Clergyman's Daughter (1935) and John Wyndham's The Day of the Triffids (1951) critique bourgeois society through themes of religious hypocrisy, rigid education, moral complacency, and enforced conformity. Through close reading of both novels, the paper traces Dorothy's journey from sincere piety to unwitting hypocrisy in Orwell's work, and analyzes how Wyndham's post-apocalyptic narrative exposes the fragility of middle-class comfort zones, political blind spots, and shifting moral codes. Together, the two novels present a sobering portrait of societies that resist change and inadvertently reproduce their own failures.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Orwell, Wyndham, and the Bourgeois Critique: Both authors critique bourgeois hypocrisy and social conformity
  • Religious Hypocrisy in A Clergyman's Daughter: Dorothy's sincerity contrasts with her father's hypocrisy
  • Education and Social Conformity: Parents resist Dorothy's progressive teaching methods
  • Dorothy's Loss of Faith and Inevitable Hypocrisy: Dorothy conforms to hypocrisy despite her earlier sincerity
  • The Comfort Zone in The Day of the Triffids: Wyndham exposes middle-class dependence on routine and order
  • Morality, Law, and Survival After Disaster: Disaster dismantles middle-class moral and legal certainties
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • It uses direct quotations from both novels as primary evidence, grounding its claims in the texts rather than relying solely on assertion.
  • It draws a coherent thematic thread — bourgeois hypocrisy and social conformity — across two distinct novels and authors, demonstrating comparative analytical thinking.
  • Dorothy's character arc is traced with precision, showing how her transformation from sincere believer to unwitting hypocrite mirrors Orwell's broader social critique.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates comparative thematic analysis: it identifies a shared ideological concern (the critique of bourgeois complacency and hypocrisy) in two works from different genres and decades, then systematically examines how each author expresses that concern through character, plot, and social commentary. This technique shows that literary criticism can reveal patterns across texts rather than treating each work in isolation.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then divides into two main bodies. The first covers Orwell's novel across three thematic sections: religious hypocrisy, education, and Dorothy's loss of faith. The second covers Wyndham's novel across two sections: the bourgeois comfort zone and the collapse of morality after disaster. Each section connects its literary analysis to a wider social critique, and the paper concludes within the Wyndham discussion rather than with a separate conclusion section.

Introduction: Orwell, Wyndham, and the Bourgeois Critique

George Orwell wrote much of his work with the ills of society in mind. Among these is his disdain for the general bourgeois mentality he observed in the England of his time. Two major issues he addresses in A Clergyman's Daughter (1935) are religious hypocrisy and the education system. Both result in society churning out more of the same dull, prejudiced, bourgeois people that they themselves have become. Similarly, John Wyndham's The Day of the Triffids (1951) has been called a "middle-class catastrophe," addressing unquestioned bourgeois values, political hypocrisy, and the search for self-sufficiency above all else.

Religious Hypocrisy in A Clergyman's Daughter

Dorothy is the main character of Orwell's novel. When the novel begins, she is completely sincere in her piety. She honestly tries to be as good a Christian as she can be and chides herself constantly for "sins" that she feels are unbecoming of a clergyman's daughter, or indeed of any Christian. She also attempts to correct her father's hypocrisy in failing to pay his bills to the tradesmen in town, upon which he responds:

"Nonsense, my dear child! These people expect to be kept waiting for their money. They like it. It brings them more in the end." (p. 31)

The most obvious theme here is hypocrisy. The Rector attempts to justify his failures and his debt by asserting that it is actually good to owe money. This kind of hypocrisy, according to Orwell, is typical of the bourgeoisie when plagued by poverty. Unable to accept any financial shortage, the bourgeoisie continues to pretend that things are fine, and thus the clergyman attempts to frame his failure to pay bills as a characteristic of a "good" person.

Dorothy, however, refuses to accept this and finds it "terrible" that her father could behave in such a way. She is therefore in opposition to societal and bourgeois hypocrisy at the novel's opening. Her faith and her life are genuine. She genuinely strives to be a good person and demonstrates this through her daily activities. On her "to do" list she writes everything that must be done each day — for example, she wants to visit a woman who has just had a baby in order to encourage her to attend church. These actions are the consequence of her sincere Christian sentiments.

Dorothy's loss of memory in Chapter II marks the turning point in her life. Knowing only that "I am I!" (p. 97), she wanders away to adventures hitherto unknown to her in her bourgeois existence. First she becomes a beggar, after which she arrives at a job in the Kentish hopfields. When she hears that her new friends are going to Kent, it gives her some sort of comfort. On a subconscious level, Kent represents the life she had known so far — civilization and refinement. Although the hopfields are not exactly civilized or refined, Dorothy does recover her memory to some degree there.

Education and Social Conformity

This recovery leads to a further "refined" job in a snobbish private school, where Orwell criticizes the education system for its rigidity and its failure to serve the needs of its students. Dorothy is again the representative of sincerity. She attempts to be honest and forthright in her lessons and to teach the students in an interesting manner. The parents, however, would not have it:

"The fact was that the parents were growing perturbed by the tales their children brought home about Dorothy's methods. They saw no sense whatever in these new-fangled ideas of making plasticine maps and reading poetry, and the old mechanical routine which had so horrified Dorothy struck them as eminently sensible." (p. 247)

The parents are thus sketched in the same way that Orwell saw the society of his time: dull and hardly alive, attempting to make of their children the same dull, deadened people as themselves.

1 locked section · 185 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Dorothy's Loss of Faith and Inevitable Hypocrisy185 words
When Dorothy finally reaches home, she has lost her faith. Her sincerity makes this a problem for her and she agonizes…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

The Comfort Zone in The Day of the Triffids

Throughout The Day of the Triffids, Wyndham comments upon the bourgeois tendency to become overly comfortable with the established order of the world. The narrator reflects:

"there was so much routine, things were so interlinked. Each one of us so steadily did his little part in the right place that it was easy to mistake habit and custom for the natural law — and all the more disturbing, therefore, when the routine was in any way upset." (1951: 17)

The order of things as the middle classes knew it was a daily routine, and it was therefore very difficult to adjust when almost everyone lost the sense of sight they had taken for granted throughout their lives. When Bill Masen finds that his breakfast has not arrived at the expected time in hospital, he is extremely nervous — and things only grow worse as the novel progresses.

Other elements of the "comfort zone" that Wyndham touches upon include the politics surrounding the triffids. Politicians initially deny their existence, and people are happy to believe them. This reflects the tendency in society to turn a blind eye toward things that make people uncomfortable, allowing politicians to commit atrocious acts because society prefers not to see. The wide-scale blindness of the people in the novel may also be read as a metaphor for this collective willful ignorance. The politics of the novel, like the politics of Wyndham's time, are unstable; war and hunger are imminent and constant dangers, and the world leaders are doing what they can to prevent these — which is, ironically, what leads to the disaster that leaves most people on earth blind.

1 locked section · 175 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Morality, Law, and Survival After Disaster175 words
Another matter that the middle classes, represented by Masen, find it difficult to adjust to after the disaster is the new law of survival. Masen steals food because he has no choice, and leaves money…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools
Key Concepts in This Paper
Bourgeois Hypocrisy Loss of Faith Social Conformity Religious Sincerity Education Critique Comfort Zone Moral Collapse Middle-Class Values Political Blind Spots Survival Ethics
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). George Orwell and John Wyndham: Class, Hypocrisy, Society. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/orwell-wyndham-class-hypocrisy-society-139949

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.