Outsourcing Email and IM Applications in Manufacturing
This paper examines how a manufacturing company should address the failure of its internal email and instant messaging (IM) applications to meet user expectations while operating costs continue to rise. After reviewing three options — retaining in-house management, full outsourcing to a third party, and cloud-based hosting — the paper argues that complete outsourcing is the most appropriate solution. It discusses the benefits of outsourcing, including reduced operating costs, improved business focus, and enhanced application performance through service-level agreements. The paper also outlines key assumptions underlying the recommendation and addresses associated risks, such as project failure rates and corporate security vulnerabilities.
- Introduction: Email and IM as Organizational Priorities: Problem of rising costs and unmet user expectations
- The Role of Email and IM Hosting in Modern Business: Importance of email and IM in manufacturing operations
- The Case for Complete Outsourcing: Argument for third-party outsourcing as best solution
- Benefits of Outsourcing Email and IM Applications: Cost reduction, business focus, and performance gains
- Assumptions Underlying the Recommendation: Key assumptions about security, change frequency, and mailings
- Risks and Implications of Outsourcing: Project failure rates and corporate security concerns
- Conclusion: Full outsourcing recommended for manufacturing firms
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from problem identification to solution evaluation, making the argument easy to follow without losing analytical depth.
- It balances advocacy for the recommended solution with honest acknowledgment of risks and assumptions, lending credibility to the recommendation.
- Specific cost categories (hardware, antivirus software, server maintenance, training) are cited to ground abstract claims about cost reduction in concrete evidence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates solution-framing analysis: rather than simply describing a problem, it explicitly enumerates competing options before arguing for one. It then reinforces that argument with layered support — cost evidence, performance guarantees via service-level agreements, and scalability benefits — while pre-emptively addressing counterarguments through the assumptions and risks sections.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement in the introduction, then contextualizes email and IM hosting in the manufacturing industry. It presents three possible solutions before advocating for full outsourcing. Three benefit categories — cost reduction, business focus, and performance — are each given their own section. The paper then addresses assumptions and risks before closing with a concise conclusion, following a classic problem–solution–evaluation format common in business and technology writing.
Introduction: Email and IM as Organizational Priorities
For a manufacturing company, one of the most important aspects of organizational success is the effective management of information. This process essentially entails delivering email and instant messaging (IM) applications to internal users. The process is considered effective when the performance of these applications meets user expectations at suitable operating costs. However, a manufacturing company is forced to reexamine its approach to delivering these applications when performance does not meet user expectations while operating costs continue to increase. The evaluation of delivery approaches is further driven by the fact that email and its associated operational costs account for a significant portion of the company's financial performance.
The Role of Email and IM Hosting in Modern Business
In the modern world, and particularly in the manufacturing industry, email and IM hosting plays a crucial role in business operations. This necessity is brought about by the increased use of technology in manufacturing processes and the need to avoid the disruption caused when office email goes down (Pruitt, n.d.). When these applications fail to meet user expectations and operating costs continue to escalate, many business owners face a difficult situation.
This scenario is likely to arise because workers become frustrated when awaiting emailed documents from colleagues and clients. Such disruptions can have significant impacts on a manufacturing company's success by damaging the manufacturing process. The situation also burdens the organization's technical staff, who are constantly questioned about when the system will be restored.
Similarly, instant messaging has become one of the most rapidly growing means of communication in modern business. The growth of IM applications is attributed to the increasing importance of collaboration in business operations through the convergence of several communication technologies (Hsu, 2004). For internal users, IM applications are often integrated with other services such as email to enhance communication within the company. Because they function as enterprise applications, integrating IM with other services requires the use of commercially available enterprise IM solutions (Hsu, 2004).
IM applications play a critical role in enterprise communication because IM protocols are integrated with other technology protocols, making IM an important part of organizational communications. Poor performance of IM applications therefore has critical impacts on organizational processes and effectiveness. Much like poor email performance, failing IM systems in a manufacturing company are likely to cause damaging effects on manufacturing processes.
For an organization whose email and IM applications have failed to meet user expectations despite increasing operating costs, several solutions are worth considering. These include retaining the data center and ownership of the applications in-house, completely outsourcing email and IM compute and application systems to a third party, and contracting a third party to host these applications through a cloud computing infrastructure.
References
Alvarez, B. (2009, October). Outsourcing your mail flow: Will it work for you? The Journal of Communication Distribution, 22(5), 25–26.
Asia Cloud Forum Editors. (2012, July 10). Symantec.cloud tackles corporate IM risks. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from
Hsu, V. (2004). The integration of instant messaging services in enterprise communication. Retrieved from Massachusetts Institute of Technology website:
Morrison, D. (2003). E-learning strategies: How to get implementation and delivery right first time. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Ou, G. (2006, February 20). Busting the myths of email outsourcing. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from http://www.zdnet.com/blog/ou/busting-the-myths-of-email-outsourcing/162
Posey, B. M. (n.d.). Should you outsource your email? Retrieved December 31, 2012, from http://bd905956a42f6ed96c17-a6046798c661ed27e3d4fdfd1b3c5e5a.r62.cf1.rackcdn.com/whitepapers/security/OutsourceEmail.pdf
Pruitt, S. (n.d.). E-mail hosting: In-house servers vs. third-party providers. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from
Vaihansky, P. (2012, November 28). Do not outsource your software development. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from
Waxer, C. (2008, May 29). Corporate email outsourcing: The perks and pitfalls. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from
"What is outsourcing?" (n.d.). IM Solutions. Retrieved December 31, 2012, from
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.