Improving Patient and Employee Satisfaction at Piney Woods Hospital
This paper examines the interrelated challenges of patient and employee satisfaction at Piney Woods Hospital, with a focus on the Emergency Department. Drawing on literature regarding employee engagement, patient ratings, and healthcare quality, the paper identifies key sources of dissatisfaction among physicians, nurses, and support staff. It then proposes five concrete implementation steps: reconfiguring the hospital entrance, reorganizing registration procedures, training physicians on electronic medical records, establishing an EMR review team, and forming a Hospital Leadership Council. The paper argues that addressing these operational and relational deficiencies will produce measurable improvements in both employee engagement and patient satisfaction outcomes.
- Introduction: Satisfaction as central challenge for Piney Woods Hospital
- Literature Review: Research on patient ratings, engagement, and care quality
- Problem Statement: Low engagement among physicians, nurses, and staff
- Suggested Alternatives: Four operational components to address satisfaction
- Implementation: Five detailed action steps with cost assessments
- Conclusion: Employee engagement drives patient satisfaction outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds each proposed action step in published research, connecting operational recommendations directly to supporting literature rather than asserting improvements without evidence.
- The problem statement is well-organized by stakeholder group — physicians, nurses, and other staff — making the sources of dissatisfaction concrete and traceable.
- Each implementation action includes a brief cost-feasibility analysis, demonstrating practical awareness of real-world hospital budget constraints.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied literature synthesis: rather than summarizing research for its own sake, the author selectively deploys findings from patient satisfaction studies, attribution theory, and employee engagement research to justify specific operational interventions. This technique connects the literature review directly to the problem statement and proposed solutions, creating a coherent argument arc across the paper's sections.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a classic applied case analysis structure: a brief contextual introduction establishes stakes, a literature review provides evidentiary grounding, a problem statement diagnoses specific issues by stakeholder group, a suggestions section outlines alternatives, an implementation section details five numbered action steps with cost notes, and a conclusion synthesizes findings. This format is well-suited to healthcare administration case studies at the undergraduate or graduate level.
Introduction
Satisfaction is the pivotal problem for Piney Woods Hospital to address. Satisfaction across all stakeholders has a substantive impact on the other key challenges the hospital is facing. When customers are satisfied with the service and care they receive at a hospital, they let others in the community know about it. When hospital employees are satisfied, they provide superior services. When physicians are satisfied, they provide excellent medical care. It is an obvious and self-reinforcing cycle. Furthermore, levels of satisfaction serve as indicators of other symptoms or successes regarding the operations of the hospital and its relationship to the community. This paper focuses on the challenges of increasing patient and employee satisfaction within the Emergency Department at Piney Woods Hospital.
The healthcare industry shares with other service industries the pivotal importance of employee engagement in customer-facing — or patient-facing — transactions (Peltier et al., 2009). Populations in developed countries are aging at astounding rates, and the healthcare industry must determine how to adjust accordingly (Peltier et al., 2009). In 2009, the healthcare industry represented 17% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In concert with increasing demand for healthcare services, there is a substantive global shortage of healthcare professionals (Peltier et al., 2009). Hospitals, in particular, are finding it difficult to consistently deliver high-quality care (Peltier et al., 2009). The issues of employee engagement and job satisfaction present complex challenges to hospital administrators on a number of fronts (Peltier et al., 2009). First and foremost is the quality of patient care, which is measured in terms of health problem resolution and outcomes, fiscal expenditures, and patient satisfaction ratings and reports (Peltier et al., 2009). All of these outcomes bear on the tasks of recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals, as well as community perceptions about local hospitals (Peltier et al., 2009). These considerations occur against a background of global shortages of nurses (Newman et al., 2001). With managed healthcare being commoditized, healthcare organizations wishing to differentiate themselves competitively are increasingly focused on measures of quality — financial performance measures are taking a backseat, as savvy hospital administrators recognize that the bottom line follows quality ratings (Love et al., 2008). The increasing concern for delivering high-quality care characterized by patient and employee satisfaction represents a shift from the management theory that dominated the 1990s, when cost-cutting was the norm and bottom-line concerns were the primary measure in a healthcare industry monumentally influenced by stockholders (Brown, 2002).
References
Atkins, P.M., Marshall, B.S., and Javalgi, R.G. (1996). Happy employees lead to loyal patients. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 16(4), 14–23.
Brown, C.L. (2002). A theory of the process of creating power in relationships. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 15–33.
Cunningham, P. (2011, May 11). Nonurgent use of hospital emergency departments. Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) [Testimony before the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging]. Retrieved from http://hschange.org/CONTENT/1204/1204.pdf
Electronic Health Records Overview. (2006, April). National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources.
Fahad Al-Mailam, F. (2005). The effect of nursing care on overall patient satisfaction and its predictive value on return-to-provider behavior: A survey study. Quality Management in Health Care, 14(2), 116–120.
Hargraves, J.L., Wilson, I.B., Zaslavsky, A., James, C., Walker, J.D., Rogers, G., and Cleary, P.D. (2001, June). Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Medical Care, 39(6), 635–641. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11404646
Love, D., Revere, L., and Black, K. (2008). A current look at the key performance measures considered critical by health care leaders. Journal of Health Care Finance, 34(3), 19–33.
Meredith, L.S., Orlando, M., Humphrey, N., Camp, P., and Sherbourne, C.D. (2001, April). Are better ratings of the patient-provider relationship associated with higher quality care for depression? Medical Care, 39(4), 349–360. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11329522
Newman, K., Maylor, U., and Chansarkar, B. (2001). The nurse retention, quality of care and patient satisfaction chain. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 14(2), 57–64.
Peltier, J., Dahl, A., and Mulhern, F. (2009, April). The relationship between employee satisfaction and hospital patient experiences. Forum for People Performance Management and Measurement. Retrieved from
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.