This paper analyzes a patient scenario involving Mr. Smith to explore key concepts in clinical assessment and medical diagnosis. It covers the five components of a physical examination, explains systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings, and evaluates Mr. Smith's lab values against normal reference ranges. The paper also compares MRI and CT imaging procedures, interprets their findings in Mr. Smith's case, and defines relevant medical terminology from his diagnosis. Finally, it demonstrates how the scientific method guides physicians through symptom assessment, hypothesis formation, diagnostic testing, and treatment evaluation.
There are several components of a physical examination. The first is observation of the disease's physical signs, as well as assessment of factors such as skin color changes, responsiveness to stimuli, alertness, mobility, facial expression, and posture. Next is the taking of vital signs, which may include the patient's breathing rate, heart rate, and blood pressure.
A third key component is auscultation, in which a physician uses a stethoscope to listen to a patient's bowel movements, heart, and lungs for abnormalities. Fourth is percussion. Under normal conditions, specific sounds are produced when an individual's abdomen and chest are tapped. This procedure allows a physician to identify the disease area, as well as excess air or fluid in the lungs.
The fifth and final component is palpation, in which a physician applies pressure using his or her fingers to feel certain regions of the body and nearby organs. This procedure "provides information about the size of an organ and changes in its consistency, shape, and tenderness, and can help determine the presence of a foreign mass."
Blood pressure is expressed as a range between two numbers — a numerator and a denominator — referred to as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively (Palmer, 2005). Systolic blood pressure represents the pressure in an individual's arteries following heart muscle contraction. Diastolic blood pressure represents the pressure in the arteries after the heart rests, that is, between heartbeats. Together, these two numbers are used to assess an individual's heart health and general wellbeing.
When both numbers are above the normal range, a person is said to have high blood pressure; when both fall below the normal range, a person is said to have low blood pressure. According to the American Heart Association (2020), a normal systolic reading is less than 120 mmHg, and a normal diastolic reading is below 80 mmHg.
With a blood pressure of 160/100 mmHg, Mr. Smith's blood pressure is clearly outside the normal range and would be classified as high. Under American Heart Association definitions, his reading falls under High Blood Pressure (Hypertension) Stage 2, which is characterized by a systolic reading of 140 or higher and a diastolic reading of 90 or higher.
The laboratory tests performed on Mr. Smith, based on the data provided, are: K (potassium test), Hb (hemoglobin test), Hct (hematocrit test), platelet count (platelet blood count), HCO₃ (bicarbonate test), urinary K (potassium urine test), blood glucose, serum aldosterone, and 24-hour urinary aldosterone. Blood samples were collected for the potassium, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, bicarbonate, blood glucose, and serum aldosterone tests. Urine samples were collected for the urinary K and 24-hour urinary aldosterone tests.
The hematocrit test is a particularly informative example. This test measures the proportion of red blood cells in a patient's blood. Because a key function of red blood cells is the delivery of oxygen throughout the body, a proportion that falls outside normal limits may indicate an underlying ailment. In Mr. Smith's case, the physician likely ordered this test to determine whether the patient had anemia or another chronic condition such as lymphoma, leukemia, or lung disease.
The following table compares Mr. Smith's second set of test results to standard reference ranges:
"Mr. Smith's values compared to normal ranges"
"MRI and CT scan similarities, differences, and results"
"Diagnosis terms and scientific method in medicine"
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.