This essay analyzes Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray as a self-contradictory work of art that simultaneously espouses and undermines its own aesthetic principles. The paper examines how Dorian's wish to preserve his physical beauty corrupts both the portrait and himself, how Wilde uses moralistic Victorian conventions as a vehicle for satirizing them, and how characters such as Lord Henry and Basil Hallward function as competing moral forces. The essay also considers the novel's place within Victorian literary culture, arguing that Wilde crafted a carefully layered piece of subterfuge that satisfied conservative readers on the surface while quietly mocking the very moral standards it appeared to uphold.
The paper employs ironic reading — treating the novel's apparent moral lessons not at face value but as targets of the author's own wit. By situating Wilde's choices within their historical context, the writer demonstrates how a text can work on two levels simultaneously: as a conventionally moral Victorian novel and as a subversive critique of that very morality.
The essay opens with a philosophical claim about art and beauty, then uses it to frame the novel's internal contradiction. It proceeds through character analysis (Dorian, Lord Henry, Basil, Sibyl), tracking Dorian's moral descent chapter by chapter. The final section steps back to assess Wilde's relationship to his Victorian audience, concluding that the novel functions as sophisticated literary subterfuge. The structure moves from abstract principle to concrete textual evidence to historical contextualization.
The Picture of Dorian Gray breaks its own rule that art should exist for its own sake and not be corrupted by society to another, lesser purpose. Human beings are prone to seeking meaning in everything, and find it difficult to simply enjoy art and beauty without looking for some other reason for them to exist. As for beauty, there is the fleeting physical beauty of things of the world and the deeper, immortal beauty of what they are. Everything of this world, being mortal, will fade, but the essence of things in the world — of life and creation, of the human heart and soul — transcends time. The beauty which the artist saw and loved in Dorian Gray was captured on the canvas, but in corrupting that beauty with vain worries about the fading of its physical aspect, Dorian Gray destroyed it and himself.
The first interesting thing to note about the novel is that it proves that hidden messages within art will corrupt it. In this case, the hidden messages are the hidden traits of Dorian Gray. When Dorian wishes that the portrait should age while he remains young and beautiful in appearance, it begins this cycle. In addition, the novel, as art, is also corrupted by the moral messages it carries. It is not that the novel is not a good story, but some of the long moral lessons detract from it. Just as Dorian corrupted the painting with his sins, the writer corrupted the book with moralizations.
In this way, the novel recalls the frames within frames of To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf, except that Wilde uses themes within themes to poke fun at the Victorian audience. The yellow book — a novel within the novel — presents yet another such frame. His characters do not ring true to the author's beliefs, and they expound upon philosophies with which he heartily disagreed, except for the occasional barb aimed at the readers through one of the characters:
"I should like to write a novel certainly, a novel that would be as lovely as a Persian carpet and as unreal. But there is no literary public in England for anything except newspapers, primers, and encyclopaedias. Of all people in the world the English have the least sense of the beauty of literature."
In chapter one, the characters talk a bit too much about notions of goodness and beauty. Lord Henry implies that moral women should not notice good looks in a man: "Women have no appreciation of good looks; at least, good women have not" (ch. 1). The long speech in chapter two about beauty is another place where the pace slows. Victorians were fond of exposition and philosophy. In chapter nineteen, Dorian tries to lay the blame for his sins on the golden book: "You poisoned me with a book once. I should not forgive that. Harry, promise me that you will never lend that book to anyone. It does harm" (ch. 19).
Since Wilde firmly believed that there is no such thing as a bad book, only bad writing, this is obviously an excuse for Dorian. There are many more places where the characters discuss morality, especially Victorian morality, but the writer is really still too close to it to quite reach his goal of being funny. Much of the moralizing in this book, which Wilde was apparently attacking with humor, comes off a little too serious. So the book, which may have been meant to criticize moralistic Victorian writing tongue-in-cheek, actually becomes a bit moralistic on the author's own terms — a preoccupation with the purity of art. It is not exactly the pot calling the kettle black, but more like whipping the horse with its own tail.
Victorian morality was very rigid and the population was thoroughly repressed, especially at a sexual level, so much of the literature and other forms of art were expressions of this repression. The literate social class — rich, powerful, and educated — lambasted artists who did not conform to the social standards of the time. Oscar Wilde was himself a victim of this judgmental society. Personally, one may disagree with the idea that art is merely for enjoyment and admiration. Every artist, in whatever medium, has a need and a duty to communicate with his or her audience, and there is no such thing as putting too much of oneself into art, as Basil fears. Art without a "soul" is as artificial as Dorian Gray's beauty.
However, the artificial boundaries placed upon the artist by society are equally stifling. An artist should be able to express what is inside in whatever form he or she thinks will best communicate the full meaning. Art should be both an expression of the artist and a mirror of the times. Wilde seems to have come closer to achieving this balance, as his characters are probably an excellent reflection of the idle gentry of his era. Wilde may have felt like an outsider and was writing for other outsiders.
Art should do no harm, and Oscar Wilde probably believed that true art was incapable of harming anyone, but that people harm themselves — which is why the yellow book cannot take the blame for what Dorian does, unless it is not art at all but artifice, created solely to corrupt. Dorian tries to use art to grant him immunity from aging, injury, and the consequences of his own mistreatment of his body, while allowing his character and "soul" to show through. Lord Henry similarly uses art — the yellow book — to prove his own power of persuasion over beauty and innocence.
Of course, the heart of the story is how Dorian Gray uses art to elevate his own status by virtue of his perennial youth and beauty, when he wishes in chapter two for the portrait to absorb the damage of age and lifestyle:
"If it were only the other way! If it were I who was to be always young, and the picture that was to grow old! For that — for that — I would give everything! Yes, there is nothing in the whole world I would not give! I would give my soul for that!" (ch. 2)
The obsession with the yellow book, given to him by Lord Henry, and with the portrait are huge fatal flaws in the main character, beginning at the end of chapter two when Dorian becomes transfixed by his own image. That Dorian is so easily misled by Lord Henry is another significant character flaw, making this character almost grotesque and entirely removed from reality. He becomes the symbol for all sinners. He even becomes obsessed with the acting talent of Sibyl Vane, so that when she finds herself unable to continue performing — because her love for him has become so real that acting has lost its beauty — he quickly grows tired of her. She commits suicide after losing him, and Lord Henry helps Dorian rationalize her death as the ultimate expression of art: Dorian's art. Sibyl becomes the eternal tragic heroine, and Dorian puts away his guilt once again.
He had been close to repentance twice and ready to marry Sibyl, until Lord Henry turned his conscience away once more. Even Basil, who painted the portrait, cannot persuade him to at least pay his respects to Sibyl's mother. Dorian continues to be driven by the yellow book to explore every sensual pleasure, living a life of idle debauchery. With each shameful action the portrait grows uglier, but Dorian's beauty remains, and it keeps him in fashionable society — even though he has no real friends.
In chapter thirteen, Dorian kills his conscience in the person of his friend Basil, whom he blames for his own vanity, because the painter created such a striking portrait of him. From this point, Dorian Gray is truly lost. He has no chance at redemption, because he has destroyed his conscience. Now only the devil on his left shoulder — Lord Henry — will have his ear.
You’re 70% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.