Professional Development Evaluation Models Explained
This paper examines five prominent models used to evaluate professional development programs in educational settings. Beginning with an overview of professional development and its importance to student learning outcomes, the paper analyzes the Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model, Guskey's Five Critical Levels, Joellen Killion's Eight-Step Evaluation Process, Joyce and Showers' Peer Coaching Model, and the Mosaic Approach developed by Shinohara and colleagues. For each model, the paper describes the evaluation stages, their sequence, and their practical application in assessing the effectiveness of staff development programs for teachers, school leaders, and ultimately students.
- Introduction to Professional Development Evaluation: Defines professional development and evaluation purposes
- Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model: Four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, results
- Guskey's Five Critical Levels Model: Five ordered levels from reactions to student outcomes
- Joellen Killion's Eight-Step Evaluation Model: Eight-step process for program evaluation
- Joyce and Showers Peer Coaching Model: Peer coaching teams and transfer of classroom learning
- Mosaic Approach and Shinohara Evaluation Model: Mosaic framework linking staff development to outcomes
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically surveys five distinct evaluation frameworks, giving readers a comparative overview of the field rather than focusing on a single model.
- Each model section follows a consistent pattern—introducing the model's origin, outlining its stages in sequence, and explaining the practical purpose of each stage—making the content easy to follow and compare.
- Grounds each model in its educational context (school improvement, teacher behavior, student outcomes), keeping the discussion applied rather than purely theoretical.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of framework synthesis: rather than arguing for one model over another, it describes each model's internal logic and hierarchical structure, allowing the reader to understand how the levels within each framework build upon one another. This technique is particularly useful in literature-survey style papers where the goal is comprehension and comparison rather than argumentation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definitional introduction that establishes the scope and importance of professional development evaluation. It then dedicates a section to each of the five models—Kirkpatrick, Guskey, Killion, Joyce and Showers, and the Mosaic/Shinohara approach—treating them as parallel case studies. The paper concludes within the final model section rather than adding a separate conclusion, which is typical of descriptive survey papers at the undergraduate level.
Introduction to Professional Development Evaluation
"Professional development" is an extensive term that can apply to a range of education, training, and developmental opportunities. For the purposes of this paper, the term is applied to a broad range of activities whose general aim is to enhance the knowledge and skills of staff and volunteers (Promoting Quality through Professional Development: A Framework for Evaluation).
Professional development refers to the process of acquiring the competencies needed to advance one's career (Professional Development). The ultimate value of professional development lies in the central role it plays in improving student learning. This means that educators must pay attention to the outcomes of professional development with respect to job performance, organizational effectiveness, and overall student achievement. Each professional development activity should be accompanied by a carefully designed assessment plan for measuring its effectiveness.
Professional development programs must be analyzed to understand their value to the school, to teachers, and ultimately to students. Assessing a professional development program serves two important objectives: to improve the quality of the program, and to determine its overall effectiveness. Assessment results should be presented in a format that can be understood and supported by all stakeholders in the professional development process. Assessment designed to determine the overall effectiveness of a professional development program is known as summative evaluation. Clear communication of findings helps ensure that results are used to guide school improvement efforts and inform professional development activities at successive levels. This paper describes several models useful for conducting such evaluations (Critical Issue: Evaluating Professional Growth and Development).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.