RAMBOTICS New Generation Robot Project EV Analysis
This paper presents an earned value management (EVM) analysis of the RAMBOTICS Corporation "New Generation Robot Project" after eight months of execution. Using a budget at completion (BAC) of $680,000, the report calculates key EVM metrics including planned value (PV), earned value (EV), actual cost (AC), cost variance (CV), schedule variance (SV), cost performance index (CPI), schedule performance index (SPI), and estimate at completion (EAC). Monthly EV, PV, and AC data are tabulated from January through August 2016. The analysis concludes that the project is both behind schedule and over budget, with a CPI of 0.81 and SPI of 0.79, and explores options such as crashing activities or accepting a cost overrun.
- Project Overview: Eight-month status snapshot of robot project
- Projected Baseline Costs: Task-level baseline cost and work schedule
- Earned Value Analysis: Task completion percentages and actual work data
- EV Calculations and Key Metrics: CPI, SPI, EAC, and variance calculations
- EV Cost Parameters by Task: Per-task cost variance and EAC breakdown
- Monthly EV, PV, and AC Data: Cumulative monthly performance tracking
- Conclusion: Project status and corrective action options
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Presents raw project data clearly and systematically, moving from baseline planning through actual performance metrics in a logical sequence.
- Uses standard EVM terminology (BAC, PV, EV, AC, CV, SV, CPI, SPI, EAC) consistently throughout, demonstrating command of project management vocabulary.
- Grounds the conclusion in the quantitative findings rather than general opinion, directly connecting CPI/SPI values to actionable management options such as crashing activities.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied quantitative analysis through earned value management. Rather than describing project health qualitatively, it derives every performance indicator mathematically from baseline and actual data, then interprets the results in a managerial context. This approach — calculate, display, interpret — is the standard structure for EVM case reports in project management coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a project overview identifying the scope and eight-month evaluation window. It then presents the projected baseline cost table, followed by the EV analysis task table showing percent-complete and actual work data. Key EVM metrics are consolidated in a dedicated calculations section, then disaggregated by individual task in the cost-parameters table. Monthly cumulative data trace EV, PV, and AC trends from January through August. A brief conclusion interprets the findings and outlines corrective options.
Project Overview
RAMBOTICS Corporation is working on an exciting new initiative referred to as the "New Generation Robot Project." The project charter scheduled the project kickoff for January 1, 2016. This analysis presents an overview of the project's status report after approximately eight months of execution, fast-forwarding to August 2016.
The project encompasses activities that fall within one of nine different categories. Work progresses through the robot's electronics, components, and software before moving into body design and overall design finalization. The activity dependencies are structured as follows:
| ID | Job Description | Predecessor |
|---|---|---|
| A | Electrical Design | Start |
| B | Assemble Boards | A |
| C | Test Boards | B |
| D | Software Design | Start |
| E | Programming | D |
| F | Software Testing | E |
| G | Robot Body Design | A |
| H | Robot Construction | G |
| I | Final Assembly | C, F, H |
Earned value management (EVM) is the analytical framework used throughout this report to assess the project's cost and schedule performance against the approved baseline.
Projected Baseline Costs
The table below presents the projected baseline costs and cumulative work estimates for each task in the New Generation Robot Project. The grand total budget at completion (BAC) is $680,000, corresponding to 68 cumulative months of work.
| Task | Cost ($) | Cumulative Work (Months) |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Design | $240,000 | 24 |
| Assemble Boards | $120,000 | 12 |
| Test Boards | $40,000 | 4 |
| Software Design | $40,000 | 4 |
| Programming | $40,000 | 4 |
| Software Testing | $40,000 | 4 |
| Robot Body Design | $80,000 | 8 |
| Robot Construction | $40,000 | 4 |
| Final Assembly | $40,000 | 4 |
| Total | $680,000 | 68 |
Electrical Design represents the single largest cost item at $240,000, reflecting its 24-month cumulative work allocation. Robot Body Design is the second largest at $80,000. All remaining tasks are budgeted at $40,000 each, with the exception of Assemble Boards at $120,000.
Earned Value Analysis
The following table presents the EV analysis task data at the eight-month mark, showing baseline work, baseline duration, percent work complete, actual duration, and actual work for each activity.
| Task Name | Predecessors | Baseline Work (Months) | Baseline Duration (Months) | % Work Complete | Duration (Months) | Actual Duration (Months) | Actual Work (Months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Generation Robot Project | — | 68 | 12 | 68% | 15 | 8.91 | 57 |
| Electrical Design | — | 24 | 4 | 100% | 5 | 5 | 30 |
| Assemble Boards | 1 | 12 | 4 | 75% | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| Test Boards | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Software Design | — | 4 | 4 | 100% | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Programming | 5 | 4 | 4 | 80% | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Software Testing | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Robot Body Design | 1 | 8 | 4 | 75% | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Robot Construction | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Assembly | 3, 6, 8 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Several key observations emerge from this data. Electrical Design and Software Design are the only tasks reported as 100% complete. Assemble Boards and Robot Body Design are each 75% complete. Programming stands at 80% complete. Test Boards, Software Testing, Robot Construction, and Final Assembly have not yet begun, each showing 0% completion. At the project level, overall work is 68% complete against a planned 12-month baseline duration, while the revised duration forecast has extended to 15 months, with an actual duration elapsed of approximately 8.91 months.
EV Calculations and Key Metrics
The core EVM performance metrics calculated at the end of the eight-month period are summarized below:
| Metric | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PV (BCWS) | $586,000 | Planned value through end of the 8-month period |
| EV (BCWP) | $462,000 | Earned value through end of the period |
| AC (ACWP) | $570,000 | Actual cost of work performed through end of the period |
| SV | ($124,000) | Schedule variance (EV − PV) |
| CV | ($108,000) | Cost variance (EV − AC) |
| BAC | $680,000 | Budgeted cost at completion |
| EAC | $838,961 | Estimated cost at completion based on current progress and cost variance |
| CPI | 0.81 | Cost performance index (EV / AC) |
| SPI | 0.79 | Schedule performance index (EV / PV) |
A CPI of 0.81 indicates that for every dollar spent, only $0.81 of budgeted work has been accomplished. An SPI of 0.79 indicates that the project is progressing at approximately 79% of the planned rate. Both indices falling below 1.0 confirm that the project is simultaneously over budget and behind schedule. The estimate at completion (EAC) of $838,961 represents a projected cost overrun of approximately $158,961 relative to the original BAC of $680,000.
Conclusion
Unfortunately, the project is both behind schedule and over budget. This is common among many technology projects, and RAMBOTICS does have some options given that the project has only achieved 68% progress. For example, many of the project's activities could potentially be crashed — that is, accelerated by adding resources — if the deadline is critical to the organization's strategy. If the deadline is not the key constraining factor, the company could proceed with activity durations as previously planned; however, it is likely that the project will exceed its budget regardless. At this stage, the primary management question is not whether a cost overrun will occur, but rather the extent to which it can be controlled.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.