This paper examines remote patient monitoring (RPM) as a leading technology trend in modern healthcare, situating it within the broader rise of telemedicine accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses how RPM is applied across various healthcare settings using wearable devices, patient portals, and data-reporting tools. The paper reviews the clinical benefits of RPM—including reduced hospitalizations, early illness detection, and improved patient outcomes—alongside its limitations, such as the irreplaceability of in-person visits and issues of patient digital literacy. Special attention is given to health disparities affecting communities of color, the contributions of RPM to patient-centered medicine, and the expanding role of social workers in implementing telemedicine in rural and underserved populations.
The paper effectively uses a benefits-and-limitations framework to analyze RPM in a balanced, evidence-based manner. Rather than simply advocating for a technology, it acknowledges gaps in research evidence—such as the need for more studies on device effectiveness across different populations—demonstrating critical thinking appropriate to health and social work scholarship.
The paper opens with a brief introduction to healthcare technology, then defines telemedicine and RPM with supporting literature. Subsequent sections address clinical benefits and limitations, health equity for underserved populations, the social work perspective on individualized care, nursing field applications, and the expanding professional role of social workers in RPM deployment. The paper closes with an APA reference list covering twelve sources.
Technology has transformed the way humans live their lives in recent times, and healthcare is no exception. With the use of artificial intelligence and robotics, healthcare professionals aim to infuse technology in almost impossible and previously unimaginable ways in order to achieve the best possible patient care and reduce medical errors. This paper details one of the recent progressions in healthcare — remote patient monitoring — and examines the benefits and limitations it is likely to pose.
Telemedicine is one of the leading trends in healthcare, particularly following the advent of the pandemic over the past two years, and it has revolutionized the way healthcare operates. The two-way communication between physicians and patients in a synchronous manner helps collect and track patient health data conveniently using accessible devices such as personal mobile phones and laptops (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). One of the most prominent trends within telemedicine is remote patient monitoring (RPM), which involves contacting, communicating with, and monitoring the patient over a video call using software that records and tracks a patient's data over time.
RPM can be applied across many healthcare settings, wherever the patient is present — for instance, at home, school, or the workplace. Smart devices and active internet connections are required for its application. Patient monitoring tools are needed to collect patient data and closely track physical vital signs. Consumer-friendly wearable devices such as smartwatches can track blood pressure and pulse rate, while a dashboard provides a thorough review of health data. An online patient portal gives patients accessibility from a computer or mobile device at any time, enhancing doctor–patient interactivity. Additional components include on-demand video interaction, data reporting in the form of charts and graphs to keep physicians informed, and support for integration with hospitals and relevant professionals for future medication or intervention recommendations (Software Advice, n.d.; Top Flight Apps, 2020).
RPM has positively affected medical and patient care, demonstrating favorable clinical outcomes — particularly for patients with hypertension, obstructive pulmonary disease, back pain, and obesity (Noah et al., 2018). Patients do need adequate education on using wearable devices, and clinicians must be able to diagnose effectively while integrating computer-based software for the specific device the patient is wearing. Results are showing more positive outcomes for certain population segments than others, which may be because earlier research was conducted on different devices and populations, such as elderly people with hypertension. More studies are still needed to provide solid evidence of promising clinical outcomes and the effectiveness of specific RPM devices for particular populations.
RPM is chiefly beneficial for reducing hospital readmissions and length of patient stays. Its major benefits include early detection of illness, continuous monitoring of patients, improved prevention of condition deterioration, reduced mortality rates, lower hospitalization costs, more precise readings through technological devices, minimized human errors, better clinical outcomes, enhanced patient safety, improved care coordination, greater efficiency in clinical practice, convenient tracking of patients' daily activities through readily available devices, expanded opportunities for emergency medical care, and greater accessibility for patients with limited mobility (Malasinghe, Ramzan & Dahal, 2017).
The biggest limitation of telemedicine, however, is that it cannot fully replace in-person clinical visits. A doctor can physically examine a patient — checking eye color, pulse rate, and other observable indicators — in ways that remote tools cannot replicate (Saljoughian, 2021). Some patients are unfamiliar with using wearable devices, and without proper guidance, collecting accurate patient data and recommending appropriate interventions can be problematic. There is also an absence of emotional connection between patient and doctor in remote settings, which may prevent patients from fully disclosing their health conditions.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.