This paper examines two critical areas of organizational risk management. The first section addresses the necessity of conducting background checks on job candidates, outlining the key risks employers face when hiring — including dishonesty, insufficient qualifications, negative employment history, and criminal records. The second section focuses on the risk of information leakage for online retailers, detailing a four-step process for identifying and resolving vulnerabilities in data storage systems. Together, these sections provide a practical framework for mitigating common security and personnel risks that businesses encounter in hiring and digital operations.
Risk management is a critical function for any organization, encompassing the identification, assessment, and mitigation of threats that can undermine stability and performance. Two areas of particular concern for modern businesses are the screening of job candidates and the protection of sensitive data from unauthorized disclosure.
Whenever an organization undertakes recruitment, selection, and hiring, it should conduct a background check on its candidates. This necessity is tied to the existence of numerous risks that a company faces when bringing on new employees. Conducting a thorough background check is highly necessary and useful, as it can help the company avoid significant challenges associated with hiring an unworthy employee or an individual who might jeopardize company stability. The process of checking a candidate's background is now significantly easier and requires fewer resources than it once did. In this context, it is strongly recommended that companies conduct background checks on all candidates they consider for employment.
Background screening addresses a range of potential threats that employers may face during the hiring process. Some of the more common risks include the following:
The possibility that the candidate is not truthful about their personal information. This means the candidate cannot be trusted and may have a hidden agenda that conflicts with the organization's interests.
The possibility that the candidate is not sufficiently skilled or trained to complete the professional tasks that would be assigned to them in the role.
The possibility that the candidate's past is negative or incompatible with the values of the company, creating cultural or ethical misalignment.
The possibility that the individual has been involved in disputes at previous places of employment, or has been suspected of jeopardizing security, committing fraud, or engaging in other conduct that poses a threat to the company (Landoll, 2006).
The possibility that the candidate has a criminal record. This issue is particularly sensitive, as employers generally cannot discriminate against candidates solely on the basis of their past, especially if the candidate has already served their sentence. Nevertheless, certain past crimes may be of specific relevance to the employer. For an IT firm, for instance, a candidate with a history of data trading, espionage, or software piracy would raise legitimate concerns.
"Data leakage threats facing online retailers"
"Four-step process to remediate data vulnerabilities"
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.