This paper surveys the development of modern economic thought, beginning with Adam Smith's foundational ideas in The Wealth of Nations and tracing the emergence of four major schools: Marxist, Keynesian, Monetarist, and Neoclassical. It examines the core concerns shared across schools—resource allocation, price stability, full employment, and living standards—and explains how the decline of Marxism and decades of intellectual debate eventually gave rise to New Keynesian economics, a synthesis that now dominates macroeconomic policymaking. The paper highlights the persistent difficulty of adhering to any single school given the complexity of real-world economic problems.
The academic field of economics is a relatively new development. Beginning in the 17th and 18th centuries, the study of economics emerged as civilization began its transformation from an agrarian society to an industrial one. The issues addressed by economists have changed very little over the course of history, as society continues to grapple with the same fundamental problems. These issues include how we decide what to produce given our limited resources, how we ensure stable prices and full employment, and how we maintain a consistent standard of living.
Although the core questions have remained essentially the same, new schools of thought have continuously emerged in an effort to address them. To date, no particular school of thought has been able to consistently provide answers to these basic questions, and therefore strict adherence to any single school remains difficult.
There were a number of early schools of thought that developed over the years, such as mercantilism and the opposing ideas suggested by the physiocrats, but modern economic thought truly began with the publication of Adam Smith's landmark book, The Wealth of Nations. Smith introduced the idea that an ideal economy is a self-regulating market system that automatically adjusts to satisfy the economic needs of its citizens. He argued that members of an economic community, in an effort to satisfy their own self-interest, would produce goods and services in accordance with what provided the greatest benefit to society.
Smith's theory was developed during a period when capitalism was emerging from feudalism and the Industrial Revolution was causing significant changes in society. From Smith's theories, all modern economic schools of thought have developed in one form or another.
At present, there are four major schools of economic thought. While variations exist within each, these four schools dominate the field. They are: Marxist, Keynesian, Monetarist, and Neoclassical economics.
The Marxist school is built upon the theories and writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. These thinkers believed that all economic societies pass through a period of development in which different economic systems are used, beginning with a form of primitive communism, progressing through feudalism and capitalism, and eventually ending in pure communism. The economy of the Soviet Union was based on the theories of Marx and Engels, and as a result of that government's failure, Marxist economics has fallen out of favor among most modern economists.
"Blending Keynesian, monetarist, and neoclassical ideas"
In its simplest form, New Keynesian economics stresses the stickiness of prices and the need for an active stabilization policy that manipulates aggregate demand in order to keep the general economy operating close to its potential output. It also incorporates the monetary policy of the Monetarist school and stresses the importance of aggregate supply as emphasized by the Neoclassical school. This blending of economic thought emerged after fifty years of bitter dispute that began with the introduction of Keynesian economics in the 1930s.
Although proponents of all the major schools of thought remain, New Keynesian economics currently dominates the field of macroeconomics. The convergence of competing frameworks into a unified synthesis reflects both the complexity of economic phenomena and the discipline's ongoing effort to address the timeless questions of production, employment, and prosperity.
You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.