Shared Decision-Making in Nursing: Process and Outcomes
This paper examines the shared decision-making process within the nursing profession, drawing on recent literature to define the concept and assess its importance for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Originally developed for the physician–patient relationship, shared decision-making has expanded to encompass multiple stakeholders in complex healthcare situations. The paper reviews core competencies required for effective implementation, discusses barriers such as emotional difficulties, power imbalances, and clinical uncertainties, and identifies strategies nurses can use to strengthen their skills. The conclusion underscores how collaborative deliberation supports patient autonomy, trust, and adherence to treatment, while continuous professional development remains essential for nursing practice.
- Introduction: Purpose and scope of the paper
- Origins and Evolution of Shared Decision-Making: From physician-patient model to broader practice
- Core Competencies and Communication Strategies: Virtues and language skills enabling shared decisions
- Challenges Nurses Face in Shared Decision-Making: Emotional and relational barriers in clinical settings
- Overcoming Barriers Through Professional Development: Mentorship, workshops, and continuous learning
- Conclusion: Synthesis of findings and nursing implications
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds each claim in recent, peer-reviewed sources, lending credibility to its argument that shared decision-making requires deliberate professional cultivation.
- It uses precise quotations strategically, allowing authoritative voices to anchor key points without overwhelming the writer's own analysis.
- The paper maintains a clear and consistent focus throughout, moving logically from definition to challenges to solutions without straying into unrelated territory.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of multiple sources around a single argument. Rather than summarizing each study in isolation, the writer weaves findings from Inagaki, Pieterse, Martínez-Angulo, and Zhou together to build a layered picture of shared decision-making—what it is, what it demands, and what impedes it. This integrative approach is a hallmark of strong literature-review writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief orienting introduction that states the purpose clearly. A single extended review-and-discussion section covers the conceptual evolution, competency requirements, communication strategies, and practical challenges of shared decision-making. The conclusion synthesizes the main takeaways thematically rather than merely restating them, and a full APA reference list closes the paper. The structure is straightforward and appropriate for a focused short essay or literature review assignment.
Introduction
Today, there is growing recognition concerning the importance of shared decision-making for the nursing profession, but the process is challenging for multiple reasons, including heightened emotions, uncertainties about the appropriate course of action, and more. To determine how to overcome these constraints, this paper reviews the relevant literature to define the shared decision-making process and its importance for professional nurses in achieving optimal clinical outcomes.
Origins and Evolution of Shared Decision-Making
As the term connotes, the shared decision-making process seeks to actively involve all stakeholders in a given healthcare scenario. The value of shared decision-making has long been recognized by healthcare providers, but the process was originally designed to promote a therapeutic rapport that facilitated patient-centered communications between physicians and their patients. In this regard, Inagaki et al. (2023) report that, "Shared decision-making is a model that emphasizes patient participation and was initially developed for the patient-physician relationship. A broader concept of shared decision-making has been proposed given the involvement of multiple individuals in the patient's decision-making process in complex real-world situations" (p. 2). Given the centrality of respecting patient autonomy in promoting patient-centered care, this expansion of the shared decision-making process represented an important step.
Core Competencies and Communication Strategies
Despite nearly a half century of efforts to implement shared decision-making in healthcare settings, there remains a lack of this process in far too many instances. A study by Pieterse et al. (2023) found that shared decision-making typically involves a number of core competencies, including self-awareness of personal knowledge limitations, mindful messaging with patients, and impartiality with respect to patient preferences. Embodying virtues such as humility, adaptability, transparency, equity, self-control, inquisitiveness, empathy, discernment, ingenuity, and fortitude can empower practitioners to actively participate in and guide the shared decision-making process, thereby facilitating optimal clinical outcomes and improving patient satisfaction levels (Pieterse et al., 2023).
It is important to note that shared decision-making does not mean relentlessly coercing or badgering patients until they agree with nurses, nor does it mean simply providing patients with all relevant information and then walking away, leaving patients and their families to ponder what should be done. There is an inherent power-relationship imbalance between healthcare providers and patients that places the latter at a disadvantage, especially with older adults (Martínez-Angulo et al., 2023). Like other nursing competencies, however, it is possible to learn how to encourage patients to actively participate in decisions that will affect their health. In this regard, Zhou et al. (2023) emphasize that, "Patient-centered communication promotes positive patient outcomes. Providers' use of first-person singular pronouns, causation and differentiation words, and clout words were positively related to perceived provider shared decision-making" (p. 1013).
Conclusion
The research showed that engaging patients through shared decision-making promotes patient autonomy in treatment selection based on personal needs, preferences, and values, enabling individually tailored care that is aligned with the fundamental tenets of patient-centered practice. The research also showed that collaborative deliberation around medical options strengthens patient trust, rapport, and consequent adherence to treatment regimens while augmenting patient knowledge, further empowering individual autonomy in managing health decisions. Finally, the research was consistent in showing that nurses can strengthen their ability to engage in shared decision-making through various avenues, thereby ultimately improving patient outcomes and satisfaction levels. It is important to note, however, that continuous self-reflection and a commitment to ongoing learning are key elements in enhancing these essential nursing skills.
References
Browne, F., Bettles, S., Clift, S., & Walker, T. (2019). Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6), 1030–1040.
Inagaki, N., Seto, N., Lee, K., Takahashi, Y., Nakayama, T., & Hayashi, Y. (2023). The role of critical care nurses in shared decision-making for patients with severe heart failure: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 18(7), 1–18.
Martínez-Angulo, P., Rich-Ruiz, M., Ventura-Puertos, P. E., & López-Quero, S. (2023). Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: A systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMJ Open, 13(6), e071549.
Pieterse, A. H., Gulbrandsen, P., Ofstad, E. H., & Menichetti, J. (2023). What does shared decision making ask from doctors? Uncovering suppressed qualities that could improve person-centered care. Patient Education and Counseling, 114, 107801.
Zhou, Y., Acevedo Callejas, M. L., Li, Y., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2023). What does patient-centered communication look like? Linguistic markers of provider compassionate care and shared decision-making and their impacts on patient outcomes. Health Communication, 38(5), 1003–1013.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.