This paper examines the shared decision-making process within the nursing profession, drawing on recent literature to define the concept and assess its importance for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Originally developed for the physician–patient relationship, shared decision-making has expanded to encompass multiple stakeholders in complex healthcare situations. The paper reviews core competencies required for effective implementation, discusses barriers such as emotional difficulties, power imbalances, and clinical uncertainties, and identifies strategies nurses can use to strengthen their skills. The conclusion underscores how collaborative deliberation supports patient autonomy, trust, and adherence to treatment, while continuous professional development remains essential for nursing practice.
Today, there is growing recognition concerning the importance of shared decision-making for the nursing profession, but the process is challenging for multiple reasons, including heightened emotions, uncertainties about the appropriate course of action, and more. To determine how to overcome these constraints, this paper reviews the relevant literature to define the shared decision-making process and its importance for professional nurses in achieving optimal clinical outcomes.
As the term connotes, the shared decision-making process seeks to actively involve all stakeholders in a given healthcare scenario. The value of shared decision-making has long been recognized by healthcare providers, but the process was originally designed to promote a therapeutic rapport that facilitated patient-centered communications between physicians and their patients. In this regard, Inagaki et al. (2023) report that, "Shared decision-making is a model that emphasizes patient participation and was initially developed for the patient-physician relationship. A broader concept of shared decision-making has been proposed given the involvement of multiple individuals in the patient's decision-making process in complex real-world situations" (p. 2). Given the centrality of respecting patient autonomy in promoting patient-centered care, this expansion of the shared decision-making process represented an important step.
Despite nearly a half century of efforts to implement shared decision-making in healthcare settings, there remains a lack of this process in far too many instances. A study by Pieterse et al. (2023) found that shared decision-making typically involves a number of core competencies, including self-awareness of personal knowledge limitations, mindful messaging with patients, and impartiality with respect to patient preferences. Embodying virtues such as humility, adaptability, transparency, equity, self-control, inquisitiveness, empathy, discernment, ingenuity, and fortitude can empower practitioners to actively participate in and guide the shared decision-making process, thereby facilitating optimal clinical outcomes and improving patient satisfaction levels (Pieterse et al., 2023).
It is important to note that shared decision-making does not mean relentlessly coercing or badgering patients until they agree with nurses, nor does it mean simply providing patients with all relevant information and then walking away, leaving patients and their families to ponder what should be done. There is an inherent power-relationship imbalance between healthcare providers and patients that places the latter at a disadvantage, especially with older adults (MartĂnez-Angulo et al., 2023). Like other nursing competencies, however, it is possible to learn how to encourage patients to actively participate in decisions that will affect their health. In this regard, Zhou et al. (2023) emphasize that, "Patient-centered communication promotes positive patient outcomes. Providers' use of first-person singular pronouns, causation and differentiation words, and clout words were positively related to perceived provider shared decision-making" (p. 1013).
"Emotional and relational barriers in clinical settings"
"Mentorship, workshops, and continuous learning"
The research showed that engaging patients through shared decision-making promotes patient autonomy in treatment selection based on personal needs, preferences, and values, enabling individually tailored care that is aligned with the fundamental tenets of patient-centered practice. The research also showed that collaborative deliberation around medical options strengthens patient trust, rapport, and consequent adherence to treatment regimens while augmenting patient knowledge, further empowering individual autonomy in managing health decisions. Finally, the research was consistent in showing that nurses can strengthen their ability to engage in shared decision-making through various avenues, thereby ultimately improving patient outcomes and satisfaction levels. It is important to note, however, that continuous self-reflection and a commitment to ongoing learning are key elements in enhancing these essential nursing skills.
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.