Shared Decision-Making in Nursing: Process and Outcomes
This paper examines the shared decision-making process within the nursing profession, drawing on recent literature to define the concept and assess its importance for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Originally developed for the physician–patient relationship, shared decision-making has expanded to encompass multiple stakeholders in complex healthcare situations. The paper reviews core competencies required for effective implementation, discusses barriers such as emotional difficulties, power imbalances, and clinical uncertainties, and identifies strategies nurses can use to strengthen their skills. The conclusion underscores how collaborative deliberation supports patient autonomy, trust, and adherence to treatment, while continuous professional development remains essential for nursing practice.
- Introduction: Purpose and scope of the paper
- Origins and Evolution of Shared Decision-Making: From physician-patient model to broader practice
- Core Competencies and Communication Strategies: Virtues and language skills enabling shared decisions
- Challenges Nurses Face in Shared Decision-Making: Emotional and relational barriers in clinical settings
- Overcoming Barriers Through Professional Development: Mentorship, workshops, and continuous learning
- Conclusion: Synthesis of findings and nursing implications
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds each claim in recent, peer-reviewed sources, lending credibility to its argument that shared decision-making requires deliberate professional cultivation.
- It uses precise quotations strategically, allowing authoritative voices to anchor key points without overwhelming the writer's own analysis.
- The paper maintains a clear and consistent focus throughout, moving logically from definition to challenges to solutions without straying into unrelated territory.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective synthesis of multiple sources around a single argument. Rather than summarizing each study in isolation, the writer weaves findings from Inagaki, Pieterse, Martínez-Angulo, and Zhou together to build a layered picture of shared decision-making—what it is, what it demands, and what impedes it. This integrative approach is a hallmark of strong literature-review writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief orienting introduction that states the purpose clearly. A single extended review-and-discussion section covers the conceptual evolution, competency requirements, communication strategies, and practical challenges of shared decision-making. The conclusion synthesizes the main takeaways thematically rather than merely restating them, and a full APA reference list closes the paper. The structure is straightforward and appropriate for a focused short essay or literature review assignment.
Introduction
Today, there is growing recognition concerning the importance of shared decision-making for the nursing profession, but the process is challenging for multiple reasons, including heightened emotions, uncertainties about the appropriate course of action, and more. To determine how to overcome these constraints, this paper reviews the relevant literature to define the shared decision-making process and its importance for professional nurses in achieving optimal clinical outcomes.
Origins and Evolution of Shared Decision-Making
As the term connotes, the shared decision-making process seeks to actively involve all stakeholders in a given healthcare scenario. The value of shared decision-making has long been recognized by healthcare providers, but the process was originally designed to promote a therapeutic rapport that facilitated patient-centered communications between physicians and their patients. In this regard, Inagaki et al. (2023) report that, "Shared decision-making is a model that emphasizes patient participation and was initially developed for the patient-physician relationship. A broader concept of shared decision-making has been proposed given the involvement of multiple individuals in the patient's decision-making process in complex real-world situations" (p. 2). Given the centrality of respecting patient autonomy in promoting patient-centered care, this expansion of the shared decision-making process represented an important step.
References
Browne, F., Bettles, S., Clift, S., & Walker, T. (2019). Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(6), 1030–1040.
Inagaki, N., Seto, N., Lee, K., Takahashi, Y., Nakayama, T., & Hayashi, Y. (2023). The role of critical care nurses in shared decision-making for patients with severe heart failure: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 18(7), 1–18.
Martínez-Angulo, P., Rich-Ruiz, M., Ventura-Puertos, P. E., & López-Quero, S. (2023). Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: A systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis. BMJ Open, 13(6), e071549.
Pieterse, A. H., Gulbrandsen, P., Ofstad, E. H., & Menichetti, J. (2023). What does shared decision making ask from doctors? Uncovering suppressed qualities that could improve person-centered care. Patient Education and Counseling, 114, 107801.
Zhou, Y., Acevedo Callejas, M. L., Li, Y., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2023). What does patient-centered communication look like? Linguistic markers of provider compassionate care and shared decision-making and their impacts on patient outcomes. Health Communication, 38(5), 1003–1013.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.