Technology's Impact on Shared Decision-Making in Healthcare

Introduction

Today, innovations in healthcare technology have revolutionized the manner in which clinicians of all types practice, and current trends indicate that the pace of these innovations will continue to accelerate well into the foreseeable future. To determine the effects of these trends, this paper describes the various ways that technology plays a vital role in healthcare. Specifically, it examines how shared decision-making and critical thinking are impacted by technology, followed by a summary of the research in the conclusion.

The Role of Electronic Health Records and Advanced Analytics

Technology plays an invaluable role across nearly every facet of modern healthcare, dramatically reshaping how care is delivered, decisions are made, and health outcomes are influenced (Bond, 2023). For example, the introduction of electronic health records over the past decade has created vastly improved data storage, integration, and analysis capabilities. With patient histories, test results, imaging studies, medication lists, and clinicians' notes all consolidated into interconnected platforms, care teams can collaborate much more seamlessly around the clock (Chishtie et al., 2023). These technologies contribute to better-informed treatment plans that account for more variables and facilitate the decision-making process. In addition, advanced analytics applied to large datasets empowers predictive, preventative, and personalized care aligned to patients' individual risk factors (Do et al., 2022).

Wearables, Remote Monitoring, and Patient Autonomy

Wearable sensors, at-home testing kits — which became commonplace following the COVID-19 pandemic — and remote patient monitoring similarly enable care outside conventional hospital and clinical settings. In the process, patients gain more autonomy in tracking vitals, managing chronic illnesses, and connecting virtually with their healthcare providers. The sheer volume of real-time data these devices provide gives patients and doctors far greater insight to make shared decisions grounded in objective evidence rather than subjective recollections from checkups. Patients can observe trends and participate as partners in their care journey rather than as mere passive recipients.

In this regard, Jones et al. (2019) emphasize that "key elements of shared decision making (e.g., defining the problem, presenting options, eliciting treatment preferences) can be efficiently integrated into the clinical workflow using web-based tools that improve patient satisfaction, quality of care, and productivity" (p. 123). More information on shared decision-making in medicine illustrates how this collaborative model has evolved alongside digital health tools.

Conclusion

Technology is transforming healthcare delivery and improving outcomes through better-informed decision-making, predictive and preventative care, remote monitoring, and increased patient engagement. While there are still no authentic "Star Trek tricorders" available for noninvasive diagnosis and treatment, the scientific community is getting close. The research consistently shows that innovations in technology have fundamentally changed the healthcare landscape in ways that facilitate shared decision-making and patient-centered care.

Electronic health records consolidate patient data into interconnected platforms that facilitate collaboration; advanced analytics enable personalized care plans; wearables and at-home testing kits track vitals and empower patient self-management; and telehealth provides convenient access and virtual assistance. These technologies automate routine tasks so that providers can focus on thoughtful shared decision-making with patients as informed partners. They also expand access to underserved groups. Finally, the research is consistent in emphasizing the need for patients to receive quality education and risk communication in order to actively participate in the decision-making process.

References

Bond, K. (2023). Challenges and opportunities for deliberative processes for healthcare decision-making: Comment on "Evidence-informed deliberative processes for health benefit package design — Part II: A practical guide." International Journal of Health Policy & Management, 12(1), 1–4.

Brognara, L., Sempere-Bigorra, M., Mazzotti, A., Artioli, E., Julián-Rochina, I., & Cauli, O. (2023). Wearable sensors-based postural analysis and fall risk assessment among patients with diabetic foot neuropathy. Journal of Tissue Viability, 32(4), 516–526.

Chishtie, J., Sapiro, N., Wiebe, N., Rabatach, L., Lorenzetti, D., Leung, A. A., Rabi, D., Quan, H., & Eastwood, C. A. (2023). Use of Epic electronic health record system for health care research: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e51003.

Crico, C. (2018). mHealth and telemedicine apps: In search of a common regulation. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6057658/

Do, Q., Lipatov, K., Ramar, K., Rasmusson, J., Pickering, B. W., & Herasevich, V. (2022). Pressure injury prediction model using advanced analytics for at-risk hospitalized patients. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(7), e1083–e1089.

Gunderson, E. G., Newell, B. J., Rohling, B. J., Melton, B. L., & Robertson, A. D. (2022). Impact of automated notifications on prescription abandonment. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 35(5), 711–715.

Jones, J. B., Bruce, C. A., Shah, N. R., Taylor, W. F., & Stewart, W. F. (2011). Shared decision making: Using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 1(1), 123–133.

Weintraub, R. L., Miller, K., Rader, B., Rosenberg, J., Srinath, S., Woodbury, S. R., Schultheiss, M. D., Kansal, M., Vispute, S., Serghiou, S., Flores, G., Kumok, A., Shekel, T., Gabrilovich, E., Ahmad, I., Chiang, M. E., & Brownstein, J. S. (2023). Identifying COVID-19 vaccine deserts and ways to reduce them: A digital tool to support public health decision-making. American Journal of Public Health, 113(4), 363–367.