This paper examines the emergence of social equity as a central concern in public administration. It traces how the field has evolved from traditional, efficiency-focused management toward an approach that actively promotes fairness, justice, and equality across diverse populations. The paper addresses the relationship between social equity and constitutional due process, the impact of multiculturalism on administrative practice, and recent developments associated with the New Public Administration movement. Drawing on scholars such as Frederickson, Rice, and Shafritz, the paper argues that modern public administrators must adopt interdisciplinary, business-informed, and equity-centered practices to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse society.
Social equity has always been an important aspect of public administration, though only recently has it been receiving significant attention. Whereas historically social equity concerned itself primarily with issues of fairness and equality in the public workplace, today social equity is emerging as a field encompassing many different dimensions of administration. Among these are public education, policy development, hiring and promotional practices, public welfare, and even transportation. In modern public administration, all of these issues are addressed in order to establish fairness, justice, and equality for all. Social equity in the field of public administration has emerged as a response to public demand for equitable policymaking and fairness in governance.
Public administration as a whole may be defined as the management of "matters which have principally to do with the society, polity and its subparts which are not essentially private, familial, commercial or individualistic" (Shafritz, 2000, p. 3). The public administration of today concerns itself not only with managing these matters but also with supporting equitable and fair governance for all citizens, in all areas from policymaking to service delivery.
There will always be social conditions that are difficult to overcome, including homelessness, teen pregnancy, chronic addiction, and poverty (Rice, 2003). These are among the many issues that public sector managers and administrators are beginning to recognize they have the power to address. Social equity can be applied to each of these areas to ensure that citizens have the best possible opportunities for success regardless of their circumstances.
Social equity within public administration relates to the management of public affairs through personnel decisions and the implementation of socioeconomic systems, but also involves planning, modifying, and developing goals related to public affairs (Shafritz, 2000).
Social equity is a phrase that embodies many meanings within the field of public administration. Whereas traditionally public administration has been concerned with offering more and better services given available resources, the New Public Administration is concerned with whether the level of service being offered actually enhances social equity (Frederickson, 1986). Thus, modern public administration is more focused on the coordination of efficient and economical services that actively promote social equity.
Powerlessness and feelings of powerlessness "are fostered by assertions that public servants should be detached, scientific, value-neutral" (Christopher & Rutledge, 2001). Public administration, however, is by nature embedded in policies, practices, procedures, and actions that should be geared toward efficiency and effectiveness, as well as fairness in "the allocation of services and resources to achieve social equity" (Christopher & Rutledge, 2001). Public administrators therefore cannot adopt attitudes of detachment or value-neutral behavior; they must instead work toward creating an environment that strongly supports the desires, needs, and wishes of all individuals within society.
Rice (2003) suggests that social equity in public administration can best be achieved when administrators, managers, and service delivery personnel have a precise and clear understanding and appreciation of diversity issues, and comprehend how diversity is built into an organization's culture. According to Rice (2003), social equity should be connected to diversity within any public organization, as it may directly impact the organization's ability to deliver public services effectively.
Within American society, public administration is faced with increasing multiculturalism that requires social equity issues to be addressed. Simply defined, social equity in public administration involves equal treatment of diverse employees and equality in organizational policies and procedures.
Public administrators are expected to work in a manner that upholds the values enshrined in the United States Constitution. This is necessary for equal treatment and administrative due process to occur. Public administration must be carried out in a manner that promotes the liberty and justice of all citizens. There was even a time when administrators were asked to take an oath upon the Constitution of the United States to ensure they upheld its ideals, further emphasizing the focus on due process within the system (Frederickson, 1986).
Today, administrators are encouraged to view their positions from an equal opportunity perspective, to embrace diversity, and to provide services that not only meet the needs of citizens but do so in a manner that is well-rounded, fair, and equitable. These basic premises are the very foundation upon which the Constitution was built.
"Examines New Public Administration reforms and business-like practices"
"Synthesizes equity's growing influence on modern administration"
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.