Sony Financial Ratio Analysis: FY 2007–2009 Review
This paper analyzes Sony Corporation's financial performance across fiscal years 2007 through 2009 using a comprehensive set of financial ratios derived from SEC Form 20-F filings. It examines profitability metrics including profit margin, operating margin, and EBITDA margin, as well as management effectiveness indicators such as return on assets and return on equity. The paper also evaluates Sony's financial health through liquidity and leverage ratios, and assesses operating efficiency via inventory, asset, and receivables turnover. Overall, the ratio analysis reveals a sharp deterioration in Sony's financial position in FY 2009, with nearly every metric declining significantly from prior years, with inventory turnover being the sole notable exception.
- Introduction to Financial Ratio Analysis: Scope, methodology, and overall ratio findings
- Profitability Ratios: Profit margin, operating margin, EBITDA margin trends
- Management Effectiveness: Return on assets and return on equity decline
- Financial Health and Leverage: Liquidity ratios and rising debt levels
- Growth and Operating Efficiency: Sales growth, EPS, inventory, and asset turnover
- Summary Financial Ratio Table (Appendix B): Consolidated ratio data across three fiscal years
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically defines each ratio before presenting Sony's data, ensuring the reader understands what is being measured before drawing conclusions.
- Uses three consecutive fiscal years (FY 2007–2009) to establish trend lines, making the FY 2009 decline more meaningful than a single-year snapshot would allow.
- Includes a consolidated ratio table (Appendix B) that lets readers cross-reference all metrics at a glance, reinforcing the narrative analysis with organized data.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates systematic comparative financial analysis: each ratio is defined conceptually, then quantified across three periods, and finally interpreted in terms of directional change. This pattern — definition, data, interpretation — is a foundational technique in corporate finance writing and allows even complex metrics like EBITDA margin or receivables turnover to be presented accessibly without sacrificing rigor.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a methodological note on ratio comparability and source reliability, then proceeds ratio by ratio through five analytical categories: profitability, management effectiveness, financial health, growth, and operating efficiency. Each category receives its own paragraph-level treatment. The paper closes with a full tabular summary (Appendix B) that consolidates all calculated values for FY 2007, 2008, and 2009, functioning as a reference anchor for the narrative sections.
Introduction to Financial Ratio Analysis
As Beers and Lund observe, "a carefully selected, diversified set of financial ratios provides a vehicle to focus attention across the entire universe of financial information in a relatively disciplined fashion. Ratios are an excellent tool for evaluating large amounts of financial information and analyzing the performance of a company over time and compared to its industry peers." This principle guides the analysis that follows.
For the fiscal years 2007 through 2009, Sony's changes in underlying accounting principles do not appear to affect the comparability of key financial ratios. The meaningfulness of the ratios calculated in this report nonetheless depends on the accuracy of Sony's financial statements. Detailed financial ratios have been calculated from documents submitted to the SEC (EDGAR) Form 20-F and related filings. Earnings tell only part of the story; these financial ratios are useful in understanding various indicators of the company's present and future prospects, including profitability, management effectiveness, financial health, growth, and operating efficiency.
Overall, financial ratio analysis paints a gloomy picture for Sony. Across most metrics — with the exception of inventory turnover — Sony showed a marked decline in FY 2009 compared to FY 2008 and FY 2007.
Profitability Ratios
Profit margin — a measurement of how much out of every dollar of sales a company actually retains as earnings — performed poorly in FY 2009. This figure was -1.28% in FY 2009, compared to 4.16% in FY 2008 and 1.52% in FY 2007. Year-over-year growth for FY 2009 was -130.74%.
Operating margin measures how successfully a company's management has generated income from business operations. At -2.13% for FY 2009, this figure declined from 3.79% in FY 2008 and 0.94% in FY 2007. Year-over-year growth for FY 2009 was an alarming -156.03%.
EBITDA margin measures the extent to which operating expenses consume revenue. It is often more informative than operating margin because it excludes non-cash items such as depreciation. Sony's EBITDA margin was 6.43% in FY 2009, down from 12.06% in FY 2008 and 10.20% in FY 2007.
Gross profit margin also declined, falling to 19.68% in FY 2009 from 23.12% in FY 2008 and 22.49% in FY 2007, reinforcing the broader trend of eroding profitability across all measures.
Management Effectiveness
Return on assets (ROA) provides an indication of how efficiently management uses its assets to generate earnings. Sony's ROA was -0.82% for FY 2009, comparing unfavorably to 2.94% in FY 2008 and 1.06% in FY 2007.
Return on equity (ROE) measures a corporation's profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested. This measure stood at -3.34% for FY 2009, a sharp reversal from 10.66% in FY 2008 and 3.75% in FY 2007. Together, these two metrics signal a significant deterioration in management effectiveness during the fiscal year.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.