This paper examines the theme of social status and inescapable circumstance in two works by John Steinbeck: Cannery Row and "The Chrysanthemums." Through close readings of key scenes — including Doc's final solitude among caged animals and Elisa's devastating encounter with the tinker — the essay argues that Steinbeck presents his characters as victims of their social positions. The analysis draws parallels between the hopeless residents of Cannery Row and Elisa's constrained life as a wife in a male-dominated world, concluding that Steinbeck uses setting and symbolism to suggest that social circumstance often prevents individuals from realizing their full potential.
While social limitation is not always an obvious burden, it can become a deeply negative force once one confronts the full reality of it. John Steinbeck's Cannery Row hints at this realization in its closing pages, when Doc is left alone with his thoughts, his animals, and his music. The final paragraph describes the rats as they "scampered and scrambled in their cages," alongside rattlesnakes that "lay still and stared into space with their dusty frowning eyes" (306). This is a deeply unsettling final image, hinting at a certain malevolence that cannot be escaped.
Rats in a cage are a symbol of everything Americans are conditioned to avoid. We do not want to be caged, running around hopelessly with no cause or direction. In the same sense, we do not want to be like the snakes — listless in a cage, surrendering to a fate of nothing but staring through glass. Yet in Cannery Row, there are inescapable truths that must be faced, and one of them is that the people living there have little control over their lives or their social standing. We may see this reality as crude and unfair, but it is, nevertheless, true.
In "The Chrysanthemums," Elisa finds herself in a situation similar to those depicted in Cannery Row. She is able to escape her circumstances temporarily through her gardening, but even that refuge is shattered when she encounters the stranger. Elisa's story differs from those in Cannery Row in that she is acutely aware of the gravity of her situation. After the stranger destroys her flowers, she understands her station in life and becomes deeply saddened by it. From this point of view, one might conclude that ignorance truly is bliss.
Elisa has profound needs that her husband does not meet, and she is unlikely to have children of her own. Because of this, she cultivates her flowers with extreme care. Her flowerbed has "no aphids, no sow bugs or snails or cutworms. Her terrier fingers destroyed such pests before they could get started" (Steinbeck, "Chrysanthemums" 1327). The flowers serve as substitutes for the children and the fuller life she will never have.
"Tinker's rejection forces Elisa to face her reality"
"Both works argue circumstance traps individuals permanently"
You’re 44% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.