This paper examines the key differences between stock dividends and stock splits, explaining how each mechanism affects a company's share float and market price. Using Apple's 7:1 stock split in 2014 as a primary example, the paper illustrates how a split can lower share price to attract retail buyers while subsequent share buybacks restore and increase stock value. The discussion also considers broader market conditions, such as Federal Reserve quantitative easing, and argues that whether a stock split benefits investors ultimately depends on the issuing company's financial health and strategic objectives.
A stock dividend occurs when a company uses money that would ordinarily be paid to shareholders as a cash dividend and instead uses it to purchase additional shares on the shareholder's behalf. A stock split, by contrast, occurs when the company issues two or more new shares for every existing share held by investors. The former action decreases the overall float in the marketplace, which means the share price is likely to be driven up — a favorable outcome for investors who wish to sell. The latter is dilutive and increases the float by doubling the number of shares available for purchase.
The impact of a stock split depends significantly on the company involved. For instance, Apple split its stock 7:1 in 2014, which drove the price down considerably and made shares more attractive to retail buyers (Stock Split, 2019). Because many retail investors view Apple as a leader at the forefront of the technology industry, they were willing to buy in at the lower price. Apple has also been conducting share buybacks worth billions of dollars, thereby reducing its float following the split and driving the share price back up, increasing the overall value of the stock.
Whether a stock split benefits an investor ultimately depends on the company and its overall strategic objective. In the case of a company like Apple — one that authorizes billions of dollars in share buybacks each year — taking the stock split is advantageous, because all the new shares awarded as a result of the split are likely to increase in value over time. Additionally, with the Federal Reserve launching a new de facto round of quantitative easing, equity markets have been propelled to new heights, further supporting the case for holding shares in fundamentally strong companies after a split.
"Conditional investor guidance based on company health"
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.