This paper examines stakeholder theory as applied to the Target Corporation, one of the largest retail chains in the United States. It begins by describing the company's growth and identifying its primary, secondary, and key stakeholders. The paper then outlines a four-step stakeholder involvement plan covering identification, analysis through power-interest mapping, management strategies, and process evaluation. It also addresses common challenges — such as cost, time demands, and sustaining long-term engagement — and argues that structured stakeholder participation builds public confidence, prevents management manipulation, and supports organizational goal achievement.
The Target Corporation has grown from a small branch of the Dayton Hudson Corporation into the second-largest retail chain in the United States, dealing in soft lines, hard lines, and mostly non-perishable groceries. The company has realized numerous achievements and currently holds the 36th position on the Fortune 500. From a single Minnesota store in 1962, Target Corporation witnessed massive expansion across all states, reaching a record 1,870 units — 82 of them in Canada — and over $70 billion in annual sales.
Like any other corporation, Target has a wide range of stakeholders: primary, secondary, and key. Groups that are directly affected by the organization's activities, either positively or negatively, are referred to as primary stakeholders. Secondary stakeholders, on the other hand, are indirectly affected by such actions. A company's employees and members of the communities in which it operates are among the most common primary stakeholders, while their family members fall under the secondary stakeholder category. Although stakeholders regarded as key or crucial may not necessarily fall into either of the above groups, they do have a significant effect on an organization's actions due to their influence on the public. The media and powerful politicians are examples of key stakeholders.
Stakeholders play a crucial role in the success or failure of any organization or program. The stakeholders of a program "have the ability to influence program outcomes, both positively and negatively" (Letavec, Rollins, & Altwies, 2008, p. 117). It is therefore important that organizations ensure stakeholder interests are adequately addressed (Rabinowitz, 2013). Organizations can best accomplish this by embracing a stakeholder participation approach, where stakeholders are given a platform to "both contribute and take ownership" (Rabinowitz, 2013).
This kind of stakeholder involvement offers several benefits. First, it enables more interaction — both between the organization and its stakeholders and among stakeholders themselves. The stakeholder-to-stakeholder form of interaction is particularly valuable, as it provides the means for more knowledgeable stakeholders "reaching out to their peers and explaining the benefits of the program to their particular stakeholder group" (Letavec, Rollins, & Altwies, 2008, p. 117). Second, stakeholders are often well-informed about community needs and can provide invaluable input regarding product design and target markets. Additionally, stakeholder involvement is one of the key ways through which public confidence is built. The public "will only believe in an open process if it's truly open" (Rabinowitz, 2013).
It is evident that bringing stakeholders together is a fundamental step toward realizing organizational goals. The actual plan, however, involves a series of steps: (i) identification of stakeholders and their interests, (ii) analysis and mapping, (iii) management, and (iv) process evaluation.
Identification of stakeholders is necessary because, while primary and key stakeholders can often be easily recognized, identifying secondary stakeholders may prove challenging. The most effective methods include brainstorming, obtaining names and categories from community members and other stakeholders, engaging in inter-organizational consultations, and advertising. Combining several of these methods is advisable for more reliable results (Rabinowitz, 2013).
Stakeholder interests vary with different organizational goals. The best way to discover these interests is simply to ask. Stakeholders are often willing to share "what their concerns are and what needs to be done, or changed, to address those concerns" (Rabinowitz, 2013). Once identification is complete, the next task is responding to the concerns raised in an effort to maintain stakeholder support.
"Power-interest grid categorizes stakeholder influence levels"
"Tailoring engagement based on stakeholder position and purpose"
"Practical obstacles and strategies for sustained engagement"
You’re 43% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.