University Strategic Plan: Mission, Values & Best Practices
This paper critically examines a Catholic, Vincentian university's "Grounded in Mission" strategic plan for 2024. It evaluates the plan's content and format against established best practices for academic strategic planning, assesses alignment with the institution's stated mission and values, and analyzes how the plan addresses community and family engagement. The paper also explores the plan's role in shaping budget priorities and financial decision-making. While the plan demonstrates strong alignment with Catholic and Vincentian values and incorporates clearly defined strategic priorities, the analysis identifies a notable gap: the absence of mechanisms for engaging the broader geographical community and external stakeholders in the planning process.
- Introduction: Overview of institution's mission and paper scope
- Overview of the Grounded in Mission Strategic Plan: Six strategic priorities of the 2024 plan
- Content and Format: Evaluating plan structure against academic benchmarks
- Alignment with Stated Mission and Values: How the plan reflects Catholic and Vincentian values
- Community and Family Engagement: Gap in external stakeholder and community inclusion
- Alignment to Best Practice and Financial Decision-Making: Best practice compliance and budget implications
- Conclusion: Synthesis of plan strengths and identified gaps
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies a clear evaluative framework — content, mission alignment, community engagement, and best practice — to systematically critique a real institutional document, giving the analysis structure and coherence.
- It balances strengths and weaknesses honestly: while crediting the plan's alignment with institutional values, it identifies a concrete gap (lack of external community engagement) and explains why that gap matters.
- Source citations from both institutional documents and academic literature on strategic planning (Smith, Goldman & Salem, Luxton) lend authority to the evaluative criteria used.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied document analysis — taking a primary institutional source (the strategic plan itself) and evaluating it against external academic criteria. This technique requires the writer to first describe the document faithfully and then shift to critical evaluation using scholarly benchmarks, a skill central to policy and education administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction to the institution and its strategic planning context, followed by a descriptive overview of the six strategic priorities in the Grounded in Mission plan. The critique is then organized into four focused subsections: content and format, mission and values alignment, community and family engagement, and best practice alignment. A final subsection addresses the plan's financial implications before the conclusion synthesizes the key findings.
Introduction
The university examined in this paper is a higher education institution whose transformative educational programs are based on Catholic and Vincentian values. The institution is committed to providing unequaled education that ensures the success of a diverse community of learners. By providing this education, the university seeks to transform individuals and communities. To achieve its vision and mission, the institution develops strategic plans that focus on different aspects of its operations. These plans are used not only to transform the educational environment but also to enhance the quality of academic programs and offerings. Through this process, the institution ensures that its strategic plans create an educational setting that helps students thrive in their personal and professional lives. This paper critically examines one of the institution's recent strategic plans in terms of its stakeholder engagement, content, and format.
References
Esteban, D. (2019). Grounded in Mission: The Plan for 2024. Retrieved from the university's Office of the President website.
Goldman, C. A., & Salem, H. (2015). Getting the most out of university strategic planning. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PE100/PE157/RAND_PE157.pdf
Kono, P. M., & Barnes, B. (2010). The role of finance in the strategic-planning and decision-making process. Graziadio Business Review, 13(1).
Luxton, A. (2005). Strategic planning in higher education. Andrews University.
Smith, S. (2011). Strategic planning in an academic context. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3588
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.