This essay argues that tragic drama, far from being merely negative, provides meaningful education for audiences by illustrating the consequences of human error and pride. Drawing on Sophocles' Oedipus Rex, Aristotle's Poetics, and Plato's Republic, the paper examines how tragedy functions as a positive force in human life. It analyzes Oedipus as a flawed but deeply human character whose downfall teaches audiences about the dangers of self-righteousness and avoidance of truth. The essay also critiques Plato's rejection of tragedy in the ideal state, arguing instead that witnessing the suffering of others fosters connection, empathy, and learning.
Tragedy, by definition, indicates suffering of some kind. On the surface, we tend to regard tragedy as negative, citing that someone, somewhere suffers because of it. In the field of drama, tragedy imitates life and, consequently, suffering. Sometimes there are no happy endings because life rarely ends that way. In short, suffering happens because life happens. However, this suffering does not render tragedy meaningless or without purpose in the grand scheme of things. In fact, when approached with the proper attitude, tragedy is a valuable commodity because it helps people learn to cope with tragedy in their own lives. In the best of worlds, it helps people avoid tragedy altogether. We need only look to Sophocles' play Oedipus Rex to see the positive results of a tragic play. Because of the education it provides, tragedy has not only a beneficial, but also a positive, effect on humankind.
Let us look at the character of Oedipus for our first lesson. One of the most satisfying aspects of Oedipus' character is the fact that he is gloriously human. Even in his royalty, he lives and breathes with the same pride that drives many men of lesser stature. Oedipus is also self-righteous and, as a result, this distorts his judgment. He refuses to admit the truth, even as all facts point in its direction. He cannot see that he is to blame for Laius' murder, and he cannot see that he is married to his own mother. All of these things make Oedipus a powerful character because it is obvious that his stature has absolutely nothing to do with his intelligence or logic. This is significant because it teaches audiences that while tragedy can strike randomly, it also has a tendency to strike when people fail to face the issues in their lives.
Oedipus' story is tragic, and this has nothing to do with his kingship. However, the fact that he is king makes the story more interesting and instructive, so to speak. It teaches audiences that no one is beyond the consequences of foolish human behavior. The fact that Oedipus is king adds drama to the tragedy taking place. The man is king, but he is in no way safe or exempt from making his life more complicated than it needs to be. He is human, first and foremost. Aristotle addresses this fact in Poetics, noting that the king is not entirely good or evil but simply real. His humanity means that his "misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty" (Aristotle XIII). This humanity, and his human actions, constitute his flaw.
"Catharsis and what Oedipus' fall teaches"
"Plato's ideal state critique assessed and challenged"
"Tragedy's social and connective function defended"
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.