This paper examines the troubling decline in life expectancy among women in the United States, arguing that lifestyle factors — including obesity, physical inactivity, heart disease, and high blood pressure — are primary drivers. The author connects this trend to growing economic inequality, which limits access to healthy food, safe exercise environments, and quality healthcare for lower-income populations. Drawing on the classical ideal of mens sana in corpore sano, the paper contends that an unhealthy population undermines national productivity, self-confidence, and economic competitiveness. It concludes with a call for lifestyle reform addressing consumption habits, sedentary technology use, and reliance on processed foods.
The paper demonstrates the technique of causal layering — moving from observable symptoms (declining life expectancy, obesity) to underlying structural causes (income inequality, consumption culture, sedentary technology use). Rather than stopping at description, the author diagnoses root causes and proposes corresponding solutions, giving the argument logical depth beyond its short length.
The paper is organized into two analytical moves. The first paragraph identifies the problem and its global dimensions, distinguishing between epidemic disease and lifestyle-driven decline while introducing the inequality dimension. The second paragraph shifts to normative and prescriptive territory, invoking the mind-body connection to argue for societal-level lifestyle change. The conclusion is embedded within the second paragraph, making this a tightly integrated short-form argumentative essay.
Every generation in the U.S. could once expect to live longer than their parents, yet today the life expectancy of women in the United States is decreasing. This raises a pressing question: Can a nation of unhealthy people be globally competitive?
As Americans, we must consider why women's life expectancy is declining — not because of an increased threat of epidemic diseases, but because of lifestyle issues. These lifestyle issues are, to some extent, affecting the entire world. Obesity, physical inactivity, heart disease, and high blood pressure are all becoming more common in China and India as people use their growing affluence to eat more high-fat foods, particularly meats and processed products, and to move less.
In the United States, and to a lesser extent in other nations, there is also a deep divide between the haves and the have-nots. Some people enjoy access to health care, healthy food, and exercise facilities, while others are surrounded by fast food restaurants, corner stores without fresh produce, and crime-ridden neighborhoods without safe sidewalks. As a result, lower-income populations are growing unhealthier because of the widening gap in income and opportunity. Even many affluent Americans, however, are using their wealth to overeat and drive rather than walk.
Mens sana, corpus sana — sound mind, sound body. A sound mind requires a sound body. A sluggish person has less energy to take risks, less bodily confidence, and often lower self-esteem. An unhealthy nation accumulates high healthcare costs and ages rapidly. It is important that we as a society address the symptoms of inactivity, but we must also treat the underlying causes: inequality, the rampant growth of consumption and technology that strips us of our mobility and binds us to computers and televisions, and the normalization of factory-produced meat and commercially advertised products in place of real food.
We must change our lifestyles — cook food rather than buy it, walk rather than drive as a default — to be able to enjoy and sustain our unique prosperity as a nation. Addressing these deeply rooted social determinants of health is not merely a personal responsibility; it is a national imperative if the United States hopes to remain competitive in an increasingly demanding global landscape.
You’re 92% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.