Essay Topic Hub

American Exceptionalism
Essays

53+ paper examples, study guides & outlines

53 papers
1 subject area
UG & Grad levels
Free to browse
About This Topic AI GENERATED

American exceptionalism refers to the belief that the United States occupies a unique or singular position among nations, distinguished by its founding ideals, democratic institutions, and historical development. Students encounter this topic across political science, history, and international relations courses, where it serves as a framework for examining how a nation's self-concept shapes its domestic policies and global conduct. The concept raises genuinely contested questions about whether America's history supports claims of moral or political distinctiveness, making it a productive subject for analytical writing that requires weighing evidence against ideology.

The papers archived on this topic approach American exceptionalism from several directions. Historical essays examine westward expansion, the early republic from 1787 to 1848, and figures like James K. Polk to trace how expansionist impulses reflected exceptionalist thinking. Comparative analyses place American development alongside the decline of other powers, such as the Roman Empire, to test whether the concept holds up under scrutiny. Policy-focused papers engage with foreign policy commentary, including work by writers like Robert Kagan, while others apply exceptionalist frameworks to specific events like Pearl Harbor or to ongoing issues like discrimination in the criminal justice system and the death penalty.

A strong essay on American exceptionalism needs a focused thesis that takes a clear position — either defending, challenging, or qualifying the concept — rather than simply describing it. Evidence drawn from constitutional history, foreign policy decisions, and domestic realities tends to carry the most weight. The most common pitfall is treating exceptionalism as an obvious truth or an obvious myth without seriously engaging the historical record that complicates both conclusions.

Sort by:
Paper Doctorate
Washington Rules: America\'s Path to Permanent War
Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War Washington rules: America's path to permanent war is an indictment of the Washington consensus that positions the U.S. as the World's Big Brother and Policeman. Commencing with the Truman Administration, Bacevich traces the birth, development and maintenance of the Washington consensus built on a credo in which the United States alone must "lead, save, liberate, and ultimately transform the world," along with the "trinity" of global military presence, global power projection and global interventionism. Based on these two elements of credo and trinity, along with the complacency of the American people, the United States has spread its military might around the globe in a so-called "flexible response" thrusting us "into a condition approximating perpetual war" that is costing the country dearly in human and nonhuman resources. Bacevich then suggests solutions in the form of a new credo in which the United States becomes a model of the ideals set forth in our Constitution and Declaration of Independence. He also suggests a new trinity in which America shifts from: a large professional military constantly prepared for war to more of a citizen-warrior force; use of our military for world domination to use of the military for defense and vital interests only; global occupation to withdrawal from areas in which the cost clearly outweighs the benefit. Bacevich's book is widely praised, though problems have been noted. Though chiefly praising Bacevich's book, Gary J. Bass takes issue with: at least one of Bacevich's severe analogies between our policymakers and possibly Hitler; Bacevich's exclusion of examples in which American leaders and the American public acted against the foregone conclusion of the Washington consensus. Gerard De Groot also praises Bacevich's book but believes that Bacevich's belief that the American public can change the current situation is too optimistic. In addition to the criticisms posed by Bass and De Groot, it appears that Bacevich's suggestion of eliminating our large, well-armed professional military is an invitation to a disaster that we were fortunate to miss during World War II. Finally, Bacevich's suggestion of defense-only and vital interest-only use of our military raises significant issues about what constitutes "defense" and "vital interest," as well as the important issue of who will decide what constitutes "defense" and "vital interest." In sum, Bacevich's book raises important perspectives and historical examples that compel the reader to examine and challenge the current Washington consensus; however, the book is also somewhat flawed and/or incomplete.
Research Paper Doctorate
American exceptionalism: history, ideology, and global influence
When the American electorate re-elected George W. Bush as their President in November 2004, the rest of the world shook its head in collective amazement. They could not understand how someone the world 'loved to hate'…
Research Paper Doctorate
Political Science - Federal Political
In what ways did the events of 9/11 and the measures taken as a result of the tragedy affect the way in which America viewed itself in terms of its own might, its ability to secure its own citizens and detect new kinds…
Essay Doctorate
President Obama and Governor Romney Approach to International Relations Issues
Obama & Romney – Foreign Policy Approaches Introduction If "realist" stands for a person who pursues "security" based on "self-interest," "determinism," and "morality" on the international scene (quotes chosen from Chapter 1); and if "liberal" stands for "capable of cooperating," "cooperation," the impact of "non-governmental groups" (NGOs), "having many interests" and "international society," then President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney both reflect some of each of these traits, albeit Obama leans more toward a liberal, cooperative approach to international relations and Romney stalks a position based more based on power and self interest and – although he doesn't spell it out in specifics – he embraces the concept of American exceptionalism (that is, the U.S. has the moral role of providing leadership for the world because American values are on a higher plane than other values). This paper reviews and critiques positions each candidate has taken on foreign policy issues, referencing the concepts of realist and liberal within the context of their various positions.
Research Paper Doctorate
Corporate Mergers and Public Good
The United States of America, during the last years of the Nineteenth Century, witnessed a rash of corporate mergers. The Industrial Revolution had taken firm hold, and the nation was changing rapidly.
Paper Doctorate
Death Toll Rises in Iraq and Questions
¶ … death toll rises in Iraq and questions are raised regarding the foreign policies practiced by the United States, books like Jack Donnelly's International Human Rights become particularly relevant.
Paper Masters
Congresswoman Nan Hayworth Summit Court,
I am writing today to discuss the issue of censorship, which I see as an imposition of socialism on our capitalism society. Specifically, I am alarmed by SOPA, the Internet censorship bill.
Research Paper Doctorate
International Affairs Political Science -
Political Science - International Relations
Paper High School
Historical memory and the selective presentation of national figures
¶ … history seems only like a carefully curated set of facts, figures, and events that when taken together promote a specific ideology or worldview. Thus, Americans focus almost exclusively on people, places, and events…
Thesis Undergraduate
2012 United States Presidential Election
This is an eight page paper about the 2012 presidential election. It is divided into five sections. The five sections include an introduction, a section on the issues, a section on the writer's opinion on the issues, a section on polling processes and methods, and a section on my prediction for the election. the issues selected include the economy, foreign policy, and immigration.