Analysis
Essays

Whether the relationship between Nora and Torvald is good or bad really depends on the viewpoint of the reader. From a more traditional perspective, the marriage would be deemed proper as Torvald ruled over his wife as…

The field of marketing has been revolutionized by the internet and the world of online networking and commence. On the one hand these new platforms and technologies have increased the potential and effectiveness of…

Neanderthal and Modern Human Differences and Similarities

This essay examines the airline Lufthansa in order to determine its strategies and goals. Lufthansa is one of the most successful airlines in history, largely due to its ability to adapt. After sitting on the brink of bankruptcy, the airline adapted rapidly where its competitors failed, allowing it to establish itself as the dominant airline of Europe.

The principle motif that this particular novel of Gabriel Garcia Marquez's revovles around is the notion that love is highly akin to any disease. As such, all of the main characters of this novel experience decidedly negative experiences associated with their attempts to find love. The most noxious of all are those endured by Ariza.

Hamlet is one of the greatest tragedies of all times, having been put into film and play on numerous occasions throughout the past centuries. Aside from its current popularity, the play is also intriguing since it enjoyed immense success immediately after being written, a rare situation for other plays.

As insurance companies go, the particular organization that was the subject of this study -- i.e. The place of employment for the team members involved in the research and analysis -- was fairly standard.

Aristotle's, the Greek philosopher definition of a tragic hero and tragedy has been influential since he set these definitions down in The Poetics. These definitions were viewed as important during the Renaissance, when scores of writers shaped their writings on the works of the ancient Rome and Greece. Aristotle asserted that tragedies follow the descent of a tragic hero or a central character, from a noble and high position to a low one.

At the foundation of any successful organization and its communication practices, systems and procedures is a very solid foundation of authenticity, transparency and trust. These three elements must pervade a corporate culture in order for it to attain a high level of performance and continued growth in turbulent times (Birasnav, Rangnekar, Dalpati, 2011). The highest performing companies have created a culture that celebrates and actively promotes organizational communication. Transformational leaders have been shown to be the catalyst of exceptional organization communications being attained and a culture of trust created and sustained (Dionne, Yammarino, Atwater, Spangler, 2004). The leader of any organization is the one ultimately responsible for creating this foundation of trust that enables highly effective organizational communications. It is the intent of this analysis to evaluate how this can be achieved. Analysis of a Leader's Impact on Organizational Communications Ultimately it is the leader of any organization who is responsible fro defining the vision of the enterprise, translating that vision into actionable steps that are pragmatic and clear, and then tailoring development programs to each associate. The role of the transformational leader is multifaceted and requires a balancing of people, processes and systems for an enterprise to attain a highly efficient and accurate level of organizational communications (Berson, Avolio, 2004). No significant change can be pushed onto employees or associates however, the longest-lasting changes emanate from how employees view their jobs, bosses, associates and the entire culture of a business (Crawford, 2005). For a leader to change an organization and increase its communication effectiveness, it must change the factors that influence every person in it to communicate more clearly and with greater accuracy and acuity. This is extremely difficult to do well, hence the perennial shortage of leaders in many organizations. Leaders must inspire associates within an enterprise to change internally and value accuracy and acuity of focus in communications before the company can ever change at a more strategic level (Dionne, Yammarino, Atwater, Spangler, 2004). The best leaders at creating a highly effective organizational communication structure and transformations are those that also are able to bring four critical factors into their businesses. These four factors include individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, inspirational motivation and idealized influence (Birasnav, Rangnekar, Dalpati, 2011). These factors taken together form the foundation of transformational leadership (Hobman, Jackson, Jimmieson, Martin, 2011).

The intent of this analysis is to evaluate the differences between China and Germany, Germany and Australia, and China and Australia. Taking the role of an Employee Relations (ER) Manager who is responsible for managing workforces in these areas, each country is compared based on their history, role of stakeholders, bargaining and labor laws. China vs Germany In comparing China and Germany's current Employee Relations practices, a framework including each country's current economic system, their respective histories, role of stakeholders, bargaining practices and labour laws are presented. Comparative Analysis Chinese versus German Economic & Employment Systems The Chinese economic and employment systems today reflect the highly socialistic, centrally planned economy versus the social market economy of Germany. The Chinese have defined their employment system and the role of employers with a strong focus on central planning as well. The Iron Rice Bowl and the HuKou systems are designed specifically for the purpose of providing citizens with lifetime employment. The Chinese economic and employment models resemble the Soviet Union in that both nations have a centralized office for managing labor grievances, in addition to openly allowing state-financed monopolies to exist. The goal of communist-based egalitarianism has failed to deliver results for the migrant factory workers who keep the manufacturing industries of China working, while the new economic ruling class, located predominantly in coastal cities, looking increasingly capitalist. China's future as a communist-based government is threatened by this widening gulf of migrant workers relative to the newly-minted wealthy class of entrepreneurs who are savvy enough to gain the Communist party's support for their new ventures. Germany has taken a radically different approach than China in terms of their employment systems. They are focused on a more social or collaborative approach between government and labor, looking to provide a foundation for continual economic growth by ensuring the long-term productivity of their workers. The German approach to managing employment is to concentrate on high skill, high trust, high quality wage models that seek to revolutionize industries. The example of this is shown for the vehicle manufacturing industry. The German focus on high skill, high trust and high quality wages has led to the need for collective bargaining and greater coordination with labor unions. History China's current economic and employment systems are predicated on Confucian ideologies of seeking social harmony and cohesion of social relationships. These philosophies still permeate the nation's culture, despite the Liberation in 1949 to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) form of government. In 1978, China adopted a socialist model of state-planned economies both at the regional and state levels. It also created, in 1978, an open door policy for initiating economic transformation. This led to the Chinese economy flourishing in a less restrictive environment. Today China continues to navigate between a communist and capitalist approach to their economic and employment practices with the latter becoming more dominant due to the potential to grow the wealth of the CCP. Germany was resurged as a global economic power after the devastation the country faced after the Second World War. Germany has emerged as the largest and strong European economy with the high export focus that rivals China. Following the reunification of Eastern and Western Germany, the economic growth of the country has slowed significantly. Between 1994 and 2008, Germany reported only 1.5% economic growth for example. Unemployment rates continue to escalate yet are not as severe as France or the United Kingdom. As of the analysis completed for the course, unemployment is hovering at 8.4%.