Getting Results by Clinton: Longenecker and Jack L. Simonetti
Introduction
There are myriad books on the market – and in the libraries – detailing how to run a successful business, how to create a smart, efficient work culture, and certainly there are books on how extraordinary executive leaders have led dismal, sluggish companies into the bright shiny world of financial success. Meanwhile the book edited by Clinton O. Longenecker and Jack L. Simonetti – Getting Results: Five Absolutes for High Performance – has numerous practical, pragmatic and easy-to-follow guidelines on how to get the most from your workforce. This review critiques the book and relates some of the key components to management.
Use of force in law enforcement and policy
The use of force has been adopted and vilified in various circumstances by commentators, states, and international organizations as an important facet of international law. Since this paper is divided into two main sections, the first part is an analysis of the various types of legal uses of force. The second part of the article is a discussion of the various types of illegal uses of force.
Research Paper
Undergraduate
Policy analysis and applications
¶ … policy analysis development is to state what the problem or, in the Waterville case, problems are. In this case, the overlying problem is, as the citizens see it, a deteriation of the social structure of the city…
Research Paper
Undergraduate
Environmental security: threats, policies, and mitigation
The environment and its preservation for future generations has become one of the most important current issues not only in general society, but also in the political arena. As such, the issue has enjoyed attention from…
IR Theory in International Relations Theory, Realists
In international relations theory, realists generally follow the rational choice or national actor with the assumption that states and their leaders make policy on the basis of calculated self-interest. They follow a utilitarian and pragmatic philosophy in which "decision makers set goals, evaluate their relative importance, calculate the costs and benefits of each possible course of action, then choose the one with the highest benefits and lowest costs" (Goldstein and Pevehouse 127). Individual leaders will have their unique personalities, experiences and psychological makeups, and some will be more averse to risk than others, but essentially they all follow a rational model of policymaking. American presidents are generally skilled politicians as well or they would never have achieved such high office in this first place, and this means that their rational calculations will always include public opinion, the needs of their electoral coalitions and the wishes of various interest groups. On the other hand, IR theorists must necessarily raise the question "to what extent are national leaders (or citizens) able to make rational decisions in the national interest" (Goldstein and Pevehouse 129).