Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Angry Men is a dramatic representation of a jury deliberating the fate of a young man accused of murdering his father. It is also the tale of one lone juror who faces off against the others when he believes the defendant is innocent while all the other jurors believe him to be guilty. This lone juror, the architect, also known as Juror #8, proceeds to argue with the others, slowly changing their minds, until they finally decide that the defendant is indeed not guilty. Juror #8 uses a number of argumentative techniques in his presentation to the others, and finally is able to get the others to agree to his point-of-view.
At the beginning of the jury's deliberations, they decide to take a vote to see where everyone stands. At this time 11 juror's vote "guilty," while only Juror #8 votes "not-guilty." When confronted by his vote, juror #8 first uses an appeal to the higher values of righteousness, he states "it's not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first." (12:00) This appeal for simple justice, to at least discuss the case before making a life or...
Then he uses another argumentative technique, bargaining, and makes the offer that if the jury takes a second vote and he is still the only one voting "not-guilty," he will change his vote. Juror #8's gamble pays off by convincing Juror #9 that his appeal for righteousness deserves the chance to be heard. The deliberations continue.
Juror #8 then proceeds to make the rest look again at the evidence, from a logical point-of-view. He begins to take apart the individual testimony of the witnesses against the boy and demonstrates how their testimony is really unclear. For example, Juror #8 combines two separate pieces of testimony together and shows that they contradict each other. One witness said he heard an argument between the boy and his father and then heard the father's body hit the floor. Another…
References
"12 Angry Men (1957)." Greatest Films - Best Movies in Cinematic History. Retrieved from www.filmsite.org.
Lumet's filmed adaptation of Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men focuses primarily on prejudice and the ways in which prejudice can obscure or distort one's sense of justice. The twelve jurors in the film all have their own personalities, their own backgrounds, their own histories, their own preoccupations: one wants to catch the ballgame and is willing to vote whichever way will get him out of the room sooner; another sees
The way the racist juror was dressed and groomed indicated a lack of class and personal pride. He was an ignorant man who had worked hard all his life, had risen to a level in society where he was above minorities and other impoverished Americans, but still not as well off as he would like to be. He had a deep seeded anger at his position in society which
Most individuals fail to appreciate life to the fullest because they concentrate on being remembered as some of the greatest humans who ever lives. This makes it difficult for them to enjoy the simple pleasures in life, considering that they waste most of their time trying to put across ideas that are appealing to the masses. While many did not manage to produce ideas that survived more than them, others
"I'm not sorry." The close-up of Susan that closes the scene demonstrates that she has had an epiphany and will likely no longer maintain the shadow of her lonely life. The crooner is all the while singing the blues classic, "It Can't Be Love" while Susan reiterates the message of the work in a step-by-step angry rant, associated with dire unhappiness, reflective of the ignorance and unfeeling nature of
Politics of Violence in Pinter's Late Plays When Harold Pinter received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005, he spoke quite directly about the subject of political theatre: Political theatre presents an entirely different set of problems. Sermonising has to be avoided at all cost. Objectivity is essential. The characters must be allowed to breathe their own air. The author cannot confine and constrict them to satisfy his own taste or disposition
Lowenstein) These children also might see their own feelings of a wish to do physical harm toward another reflected in the feelings of others, the psychological term known as projection, and may be afraid or paranoid of others intentions. Sometimes the criminal act of murder is an extension of previous anti-social acts of less serious forms of delinquency and criminality and children merely graduate to more extended and more violent and extreme